Open source culture developed an allergy to gatekeeping that made sense when the risk was excluding talented people.
-
"The Slopocene"
@dancast @Daojoan With apologies to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_F._Stoermer
-
Open source culture developed an allergy to gatekeeping that made sense when the risk was excluding talented people. It makes less sense when the risk is thousands of LLM-generated PRs that change variable names to slightly worse variable names.
https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-case-for-gatekeeping-or-why-medieval-guilds-had-it-figured-out/
@Daojoan There is something--beyond the foundational utility of it--charmingly satisfying about this idea. It would also put a "signed" person within a lineage of respect. That kindof cuts both ways and the potential exclusionary results you comment on, but the medieval/Renaissance theme definitely goes deeper than master/apprentice and guilds.
(similarly-but-differently, there's the concept of musical genealogy w/r/t pianists and their teachers reaching back to e.g. Chopin or Liszt)
-
Open source culture developed an allergy to gatekeeping that made sense when the risk was excluding talented people. It makes less sense when the risk is thousands of LLM-generated PRs that change variable names to slightly worse variable names.
https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-case-for-gatekeeping-or-why-medieval-guilds-had-it-figured-out/
-
Open source culture developed an allergy to gatekeeping that made sense when the risk was excluding talented people. It makes less sense when the risk is thousands of LLM-generated PRs that change variable names to slightly worse variable names.
https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-case-for-gatekeeping-or-why-medieval-guilds-had-it-figured-out/
@Daojoan Sorry, tech and physical issues are hindering me atm, but yesterday I think I posted about the maintainer of a really important python repository, and when he refused the clawdbot merge, the bot went out and started a website and went on full attack, posting stuff that could have really damaged Scott irl.
Agentic LLM running "autonomous" bots, creates a universe where gatekeepers are imperative.
-
@Daojoan There is something--beyond the foundational utility of it--charmingly satisfying about this idea. It would also put a "signed" person within a lineage of respect. That kindof cuts both ways and the potential exclusionary results you comment on, but the medieval/Renaissance theme definitely goes deeper than master/apprentice and guilds.
(similarly-but-differently, there's the concept of musical genealogy w/r/t pianists and their teachers reaching back to e.g. Chopin or Liszt)
@sstrader @Daojoan This type of approach is needed for vetting news also. For too long, many in the public have considered photo/videographic evidence to be self-evidently true, or we relied on large impersonal institutions to be the source of truth. In the social media era, many fail to even demand basic journalistic competence (documenting when and where the photo was taken).
We need to carefully rebuild a vetting system based on real interactions that have demonstrated reliability, and make sure we don't reproduce segregation and exclusion that currently dominates many of our institutions. -
@puercomal i don't want no deaths on my shoulders
@Daojoan legit
-
Open source culture developed an allergy to gatekeeping that made sense when the risk was excluding talented people. It makes less sense when the risk is thousands of LLM-generated PRs that change variable names to slightly worse variable names.
https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-case-for-gatekeeping-or-why-medieval-guilds-had-it-figured-out/
"The guild was, at bottom, a web of trust backed by skin in the game. You vouched for people. If they turned out to be frauds, you were fucked, too."
I love this and it's how I think about my doctoral students! They've been to my house, they've met my kids and they're invited to Thanksgiving dinner because they're a part of my extended family!
-
@sstrader @Daojoan This type of approach is needed for vetting news also. For too long, many in the public have considered photo/videographic evidence to be self-evidently true, or we relied on large impersonal institutions to be the source of truth. In the social media era, many fail to even demand basic journalistic competence (documenting when and where the photo was taken).
We need to carefully rebuild a vetting system based on real interactions that have demonstrated reliability, and make sure we don't reproduce segregation and exclusion that currently dominates many of our institutions.@DecaturNature @Daojoan And if I see one more image on here with unattributed text I'm going to go crazy.
-
@puercomal i don't want no deaths on my shoulders
@Daojoan @puercomal around your feet is far more convenient if you accept the trip hazard or wear hiking boots.
-
@Daojoan There is something--beyond the foundational utility of it--charmingly satisfying about this idea. It would also put a "signed" person within a lineage of respect. That kindof cuts both ways and the potential exclusionary results you comment on, but the medieval/Renaissance theme definitely goes deeper than master/apprentice and guilds.
(similarly-but-differently, there's the concept of musical genealogy w/r/t pianists and their teachers reaching back to e.g. Chopin or Liszt)
-
A anderslund@expressional.social shared this topic
