And the same dudes will wonder, "Why aren't women interested?"

[paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange]

@Ask_aubry

not corrected nor led by a man, if that is a woman's choice? sure sounds like win/win to me.

[theunicorn@mastodon.social]

@Ask_aubry why are you sharing some crap from Twatter. They're all savages over there. Uneducated chumps.

[pthane@toot.wales]

@Ask_aubry I used to teach in a (UK) high school. It was noticeable that the 'laddish' boys, the noisy, rude, sporty types who tried to dominate the classroom were despised by the girls. The polite, quiet, respectful boys often had female friends and sometimes they became 'girlfriends'.

[courtcan@mastodon.social]

@alessandro @Ask_aubry That burn is PERFECTION.

[ggmcbg@mstdn.plus]

@Ask_aubry

Loveless chronic masturbators-in-Christ have a lot to say about women.

[scandigonian@pnw.zone]

@Ask_aubry
It astounds me that there are guys that still think like this! I'm 65 years old. If my dad said anything like this and my mom got wind of it, he'd definitely be in the doghouse.

[benny@kirche.social]

@Ask_aubry that's a non sequitur, sadly.
Just because a woman cannot be "corrected" or "lead" by a man doesn't mean she will not have to deal with him.

[sentientsponge@mastodon.social]

@Ask_aubry Having to lead anyone sounds exhausting. This is just some asshole who wants to feel dominate, but is just some sad ass misogynist who almost certainly needs someone to lead him around so he doesn't fuck up quite as much.

[clew@ecoevo.social]

Nb: by “correction” many rightwingers mean “physical violence”. Even within a family.

@Ask_aubry

[ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai]

@Ask_aubry

[li@tech.lgbt]

@Ask_aubry @Misofist be ungovernable in general fuck shitheads wanting to control and have power over you