Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
63 Indlæg 52 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

    https://ca.pcmag.com/news/16760/fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-giant-mirror-satellite-that-astronomers-hate

    fustiki_scuria@mastodon.octofriends.gardenF This user is from outside of this forum
    fustiki_scuria@mastodon.octofriends.gardenF This user is from outside of this forum
    fustiki_scuria@mastodon.octofriends.garden
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #50

    @sundogplanets Ok, back of the napkin-style math time. According to NASA, the moon's surface area is roughly (rounded up) 40×10^6 km², or 40×10^12m². These sattelites are 18m×18m or roughly (rounded up) 400m^2. The moon only shows us half of it's surface area, which is half-illuminated on average (the actual amount of light we receive from the moon is a bit less than that due to the moon being present for less of the night when nearer to a full moon, but I'll ignore that for now). So we've got 40e12/40e1/2/2 or 2.5e10, unitless. If we assume the moon reflects 20% as well as those mirrors (this is generous towards the mirrors), we end up with 5e9, or five billion. That's approximately the amount of these mirrors we'd need to build to reflect as much light back to the earth as the moon. Due to the very approximate nature of these only the order of magnitude really matters, but it is still a ridiculous amount and not worth it. After all, adding a second moon to power solar panels would probably not give ROI within the lifespan of the sun.

    What are they even trying to do???

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Want some reminders of how fucking terrible this idea is?

      https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/true-cost-solar-power-night-reflect-orbital/

      https://theconversation.com/a-us-startup-plans-to-deliver-sunlight-on-demand-after-dark-can-it-work-and-would-we-want-it-to-264323

      https://darksky.org/news/organizational-statement-reflect-orbital/

      Journalists: please write about how dangerous this is.

      Lawyers (especially if you're based in the US): please help fight this, it will take legal action now

      0x56@tech.lgbt0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0x56@tech.lgbt0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0x56@tech.lgbt
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #51

      @sundogplanets most of the reporting focuses on the nighttime solar farm use case and misses the bigger plan

      Reflect are marketing this to all kinds of customers:
      - emergency responders (they're using the Venezuela earthquakes in particular as a talking point, to claim how beneficial this is to humanity in a way that makes opponents of the plan sound like assholes)
      - industrial sites to allow nighttime work (pretty sure we've had work lighting for a while...)
      - agricultural (possibly eke out some more crop growth? i'm sure there are no downsides to this)
      - municipalities (quoting them, "replace streetlights, reduce light pollution" ...um, how exactly are you reducing light pollution by BEAMING IN THE SUN?!)
      - defense (ah, here we go... rake in those government contracts, while cementing yourself as a critical military asset so no one can shut you down)
      - festivals and events ("unforgettable nighttime experiences" except they're not really nighttime experiences if it's bright as shit, are they?)

      0x56@tech.lgbt0 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • beamsandbows@mastodon.sdf.orgB beamsandbows@mastodon.sdf.org

        @sundogplanets can I just beat the unholy ribbons and bows out of today? I am so tired.

        cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
        cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
        cascheranno@hachyderm.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #52

        @BeamsAndBows am saving ‘beat the unholy ribbons and bows out of’. Yours? Or an actual extant saying? Either way: Brilliant.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pakowitsch@ruhr.socialP pakowitsch@ruhr.social

          @sundogplanets
          Mmhh, the Name oft the satellite is from Lord oft the rings. Is Peter Thiel involved in this shit?

          cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
          cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
          cascheranno@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #53

          @pakowitsch @sundogplanets taking bets on yes. If it’s bonkers and blind to any sense of environmental responsibility, odds are 1:10. Give it a name i’d have pulled outa my ass at 13, they go to even odds.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0x56@tech.lgbt0 0x56@tech.lgbt

            @sundogplanets most of the reporting focuses on the nighttime solar farm use case and misses the bigger plan

            Reflect are marketing this to all kinds of customers:
            - emergency responders (they're using the Venezuela earthquakes in particular as a talking point, to claim how beneficial this is to humanity in a way that makes opponents of the plan sound like assholes)
            - industrial sites to allow nighttime work (pretty sure we've had work lighting for a while...)
            - agricultural (possibly eke out some more crop growth? i'm sure there are no downsides to this)
            - municipalities (quoting them, "replace streetlights, reduce light pollution" ...um, how exactly are you reducing light pollution by BEAMING IN THE SUN?!)
            - defense (ah, here we go... rake in those government contracts, while cementing yourself as a critical military asset so no one can shut you down)
            - festivals and events ("unforgettable nighttime experiences" except they're not really nighttime experiences if it's bright as shit, are they?)

            0x56@tech.lgbt0 This user is from outside of this forum
            0x56@tech.lgbt0 This user is from outside of this forum
            0x56@tech.lgbt
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #54

            @sundogplanets i'm laughing through the nauseous pit in my stomach at this image from Reflect's own marketing copy

            "Illuminate [...] [?]ones and [...] missions."

            hey, woah *squints into the glare* i'm trying to read your ad here, it's too bright, could you dim the light a bit?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • iagondiscord@wetdry.worldI iagondiscord@wetdry.world

              @sundogplanets also, space is hard
              I would say it would be more practical to just put solar panels around the world and have them supply energy for the entire world, but that would actually require international cooperation and the geopolitical climate just isn't stable enough to handle that
              Three guesses on whose fault that is
              Point being, this is a perfectly logical idea if you're a liberal, and completely absurd if you aren't

              cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
              cascheranno@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
              cascheranno@hachyderm.io
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #55

              @iagondiscord @sundogplanets uh… I read this like you think *liberalism* likes spacex, giant space solar mirrors, and etc. Or did your last ‘This’ intend to stretch out to ‘deploying solar panels on the ground’ vs. this=mirrors?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                cy@fedicy.us.to
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #56
                Ostensibly the agreement for satellite launch approval is if any of the governments approves it then it's approved, and the US always approves it.
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

                  https://ca.pcmag.com/news/16760/fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-giant-mirror-satellite-that-astronomers-hate

                  schtaks@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  schtaks@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  schtaks@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #57

                  @sundogplanets FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jfmezei@cosocial.caJ jfmezei@cosocial.ca

                    @sundogplanets This was done before. Suggest you watch the documentary "Die Another Day". Some north korean launched it and when the Americans sent missiles to destroy it, he just aimed his mirror at the missiles and fried them.

                    The mirror was demoed at some ice castle in Iceland when he benevolently lit up just the castle at night to impress the guests, but then focused mirror to try to fry some british spy out to disable mirror.

                    Curiious which international body could stop this.

                    cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cy@fedicy.us.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #58
                    the documentary "Die Another Day"
                    🤭
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

                      https://ca.pcmag.com/news/16760/fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-giant-mirror-satellite-that-astronomers-hate

                      pineywoozle@masto.aiP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pineywoozle@masto.aiP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pineywoozle@masto.ai
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #59

                      @sundogplanets Hey at least they didn’t paint it tacky gold…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

                        https://ca.pcmag.com/news/16760/fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-giant-mirror-satellite-that-astronomers-hate

                        neontapir@retro.pizzaN This user is from outside of this forum
                        neontapir@retro.pizzaN This user is from outside of this forum
                        neontapir@retro.pizza
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #60

                        @sundogplanets the mind boggles, what a crock of an idea

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • atzanteol@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          atzanteol@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          atzanteol@techhub.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #61

                          @stuartl @msbellows @ai6yr @sundogplanets
                          Space debris doesn't de-orbit things, it just creates a lot more space debris.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Want some reminders of how fucking terrible this idea is?

                            https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/true-cost-solar-power-night-reflect-orbital/

                            https://theconversation.com/a-us-startup-plans-to-deliver-sunlight-on-demand-after-dark-can-it-work-and-would-we-want-it-to-264323

                            https://darksky.org/news/organizational-statement-reflect-orbital/

                            Journalists: please write about how dangerous this is.

                            Lawyers (especially if you're based in the US): please help fight this, it will take legal action now

                            filobus@sociale.networkF This user is from outside of this forum
                            filobus@sociale.networkF This user is from outside of this forum
                            filobus@sociale.network
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #62

                            @sundogplanets where's the problem?
                            There'll be another startup that'll bring thousands satellites that can bring shadow on earth wherever you want
                            Obviously you'll have to pay for that
                            And soon there'll be so much garbage in the sky that there'll be no more sky, sun, stars
                            Capitalists with no restraints' dream is a nightmare, it seems, the sooner they'll be stopped the better is

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK NOOOOO

                              https://ca.pcmag.com/news/16760/fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-giant-mirror-satellite-that-astronomers-hate

                              bartv@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bartv@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bartv@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #63

                              @sundogplanets MURICA

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper