Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
104 Indlæg 52 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • nicovel0@mastodon.socialN nicovel0@mastodon.social

    @dan @jaawerth @cstross the judge will know when they take a look at it.

    jaawerth@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jaawerth@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jaawerth@functional.cafe
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #75

    @Nicovel0 @dan @cstross

    "Did you pass the underage VPN ban?"
    "Sure did, boss! Required federated identity on every *nix host accessible from the UK, real impossible just like you asked!"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • oschonrock@mastodon.socialO oschonrock@mastodon.social

      @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

      Complex subject.

      For example, I would be quite pro a complete twitter ban in EU/UK.

      Is that "nanny state", or is that recognising that X is deliberately manipulated to be a malignant anti-democratic cancer?

      Porn for kids.... TBH, I get less excited about that, and selective blocking is hard/impractical.

      ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
      ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
      ahltorp@mastodon.nu
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #76

      @oschonrock @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad One reason for a Twitter ban is that it would then be much more difficult for people to excuse their presence there. And for people not wanting to be there but feel pressured to, to get an excuse to leave.

      oschonrock@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • highlandlawyer@mastodon.socialH highlandlawyer@mastodon.social

        @Fonant @david_chisnall @cstross
        "We don't need to worry, because the govt will not be able to enforce it" is the counterpart to legislators who say "we don't need to put in detailed definitions & restrictions, because we trust police & prosecutors to use the powers responsibly".
        History has proven both are always true until they aren't.

        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
        petealexharris@mastodon.scot
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #77

        @HighlandLawyer @Fonant @david_chisnall @cstross

        Exactly this.

        A bad law isn't one that states its own intention to be abused, it's one that doesn't include specific concrete measures to prevent abuse, because the intent to abuse will surely come along soon enough, like it always has.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • fonant@social.vivaldi.netF fonant@social.vivaldi.net

          @cstross @david_chisnall The likelihood of the police taking my computer for forensic examination is zero.

          I have plenty of things that I must keep private. So does everyone.

          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
          ahltorp@mastodon.nu
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #78

          @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall One should design a society so that there is as little as possible for the people in power to grab on to once it becomes a police state. A legislation process that only considers fair weather is really bad, and the weather already seems kind of cloudy.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • oschonrock@mastodon.socialO oschonrock@mastodon.social

            @hypostase @cstross

            I have no idea if that is their intention. Highly doubt it, given how clueless they are.

            The smart ones will use TOR bridges so it's even less trackable.

            But then you were probably being sarcastic, and well, I agree. That's what happens when you put stupid logs in people's way.. they learn to jump over them. And some will break their legs doing it.

            hypostase@bsd.networkH This user is from outside of this forum
            hypostase@bsd.networkH This user is from outside of this forum
            hypostase@bsd.network
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #79

            @oschonrock

            A little sarcastic, yes.

            But I think it'll be more than just the "smart" ones, I think the kids'll share.

            As you say some will get hurt, but I'm not convinced that the numbers will be any different from what they would have been without intervention.

            Just as with pretty much every "tech" problem, effective intervention for harm reduction needs to be social, but nobody will actually fund the workers needed to do that.

            @cstross

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fonant@social.vivaldi.netF fonant@social.vivaldi.net

              @cstross @david_chisnall The likelihood of the police taking my computer for forensic examination is zero.

              I have plenty of things that I must keep private. So does everyone.

              ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
              ret@furry.engineerR This user is from outside of this forum
              ret@furry.engineer
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #80

              @Fonant @cstross @david_chisnall actually it's one unfortunate incident or altercation in the street or false report or log interpretation error or mistaken identity or... or... or... etc away.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                pikesley@mastodon.me.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                pikesley@mastodon.me.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                pikesley@mastodon.me.uk
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #81

                @cstross I have a fleet of devices in the field that communicate back to my infrastructure over VPN links. Do those devices now have to prove they're over 16? Do both ends? Does anybody in charge have any fucking idea what they're doing?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                  UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                  *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                  dryak@mstdn.scienceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dryak@mstdn.scienceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dryak@mstdn.science
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #82

                  @cstross Reason number "a zillion and some" why privacy, etc. is better served using something decentralized like Tor, rather than VPNs companies that can be forced to ID-check UK users.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • oschonrock@mastodon.socialO oschonrock@mastodon.social

                    @PeterSommerlad @cstross

                    Well the "home lan" is effectively the "corporate use case" I described, just for advanced IT folk.. (I used to do the same).

                    The geoblocking use case is "fair" in the sense that it "just works", but almost certainly contravenes the streaming service providers T&Cs. It does nothing for privacy, since you clearly log into these services.

                    (Psst: I also use TOR to get around geoblocking.. not quite as convenient, but free)

                    bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bob_zim@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #83

                    @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad @cstross This gets at a particularly dumb part of “banning VPNs”: the VPN is just the transport mechanism the proxy service uses.

                    No, we’re not a VPN, we’re a SOCKS proxy.

                    No, SOCKS is banned now, so we shut that down. We do offer a QUIC proxy, though.

                    And so on.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dan@axillae.telent.netD dan@axillae.telent.net

                      @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 the amendment does not appear to define "virtual private network", so ... does it include TOR? SSH SOCKS proxy? L2TP? PPPoE?

                      drwho@masto.hackers.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                      drwho@masto.hackers.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                      drwho@masto.hackers.town
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #84

                      @dan @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 It will include whatever they deem it does for whatever purpose they see fit. Even Citrix and VNC if they think they need to.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

                        ulrich_the_elder@thecanadian.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                        ulrich_the_elder@thecanadian.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                        ulrich_the_elder@thecanadian.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #85

                        @cstross @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Perhaps try putting a labour MP in charge of the labour party instead of a fucking tory.... It failed with Blair and it is failing with Starmer.

                        oschonrock@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ulrich_the_elder@thecanadian.socialU ulrich_the_elder@thecanadian.social

                          @cstross @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Perhaps try putting a labour MP in charge of the labour party instead of a fucking tory.... It failed with Blair and it is failing with Starmer.

                          oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oschonrock@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          oschonrock@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #86

                          @Ulrich_the_elder @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad TBF... Blair was better..

                          He communicated better. So he managed to achieve more things that a labour govt should..

                          Notably in education for him..

                          But yeah he fucked it up by being a religious nutcase going on crusades in the middle east...(Very Tory) Among other things

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                            UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                            *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                            wokstation@universeodon.comW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wokstation@universeodon.comW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wokstation@universeodon.com
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #87

                            @cstross like I said ages ago, licensing VPN users is the intent. You'll need a "good" reason to obtain one, otherwise your isp will block #vpn traffic.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                              UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                              *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                              sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #88

                              @cstross it also means banning anyone under age from owning/renting a server in a different country, with very much the same implications for people over the age limit, since setting up a VPN endpoint is reasonably easy enough for your average technically inclined 16 year old. Oh and also, it outlaws TOR, if taken to its logical conclusion.

                              rrb@infosec.exchangeR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cstamp@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #89

                                @cstross Haven't adults clued into the fact that trying to force kids into boxes never works out? On top of the privacy issues.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                  UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                  *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fooker@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #90

                                  @cstross as a kid growing up in europe and taught again and again about the resistance, I'd always thought that my lack of physical prowess would mean I'd be mostly useless if it ever happened again. But now that it's rearing it's head all I can hear is my mother saying "you'll never amount to anything spending all your days on that computer". Look at me now mom, my knowledge may just save the free world.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

                                    @cstross it also means banning anyone under age from owning/renting a server in a different country, with very much the same implications for people over the age limit, since setting up a VPN endpoint is reasonably easy enough for your average technically inclined 16 year old. Oh and also, it outlaws TOR, if taken to its logical conclusion.

                                    rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rrb@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #91

                                    @sophieschmieg @cstross When I was a kid and somebody would ask my parents if I was old enough for a given book, they would say: "If he is innocent, he won't understand and it won't hurt him. If he isn't, and understands it, it won't hurt him."

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                      RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                      UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                      *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                      jbqueru@floss.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jbqueru@floss.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jbqueru@floss.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #92

                                      @cstross Soon you'll need to get your age verified before you can use an age-verification service.

                                      falken@qoto.orgF moonemprah@tech.lgbtM 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jbqueru@floss.socialJ jbqueru@floss.social

                                        @cstross Soon you'll need to get your age verified before you can use an age-verification service.

                                        falken@qoto.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        falken@qoto.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        falken@qoto.org
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #93

                                        @cstross @jbqueru who's going to verify my verification though?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                          RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                                          UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                                          *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                                          stevefenton@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stevefenton@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stevefenton@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #94

                                          @cstross I've written to my MP about this already, so an easy decision to add my signature to the petition.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper