Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago

You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
217 Indlæg 177 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

    You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
    Turns out that was on purpose

    lillyfinch@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    lillyfinch@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    lillyfinch@mstdn.social
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #123

    @ocean I hate google

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

      You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
      Turns out that was on purpose

      freetar@freesoftwareextremist.comF This user is from outside of this forum
      freetar@freesoftwareextremist.comF This user is from outside of this forum
      freetar@freesoftwareextremist.com
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #124
      @ocean
      It became unusable since it demands the execution of proprietary malware. While you can elude this requirement, it is advisable to use 4get to access this and other search engines.
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gsuberland@chaos.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #125

        @osman @seq @morgunkorn hmm. the first email floats the idea of reducing search quality to get more queries, with a caveat of being uncomfortable about it. the rest looks like the results of projects and efforts that were ongoing at the time. am I missing a detail in that email chain that demonstrates that they actually followed through? don't get me wrong, it's gross that they even floated the idea, but if this is intended to be evidentiary proof of committal then I'm not seeing a smoking gun.

        gsuberland@chaos.socialG delroth@mastodon.delroth.netD mistermaker@fosstodon.orgM 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • catswhocode@twoot.siteC catswhocode@twoot.site

          @ocean not surprising.
          Thankfully I rarely use them! @aetios

          powerpath@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          powerpath@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          powerpath@mastodon.social
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #126

          @CatsWhoCode @ocean @aetios

          ddg.co !

          catswhocode@twoot.siteC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

            @osman @seq @morgunkorn hmm. the first email floats the idea of reducing search quality to get more queries, with a caveat of being uncomfortable about it. the rest looks like the results of projects and efforts that were ongoing at the time. am I missing a detail in that email chain that demonstrates that they actually followed through? don't get me wrong, it's gross that they even floated the idea, but if this is intended to be evidentiary proof of committal then I'm not seeing a smoking gun.

            gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gsuberland@chaos.social
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #127

            @osman @seq @morgunkorn obviously we all anecdotally feel like the search quality dropped, and their email discussion is at least circumstantially suggestive of intent, but I would feel better if I knew what the specific evidentiary purpose of the document was.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

              You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
              Turns out that was on purpose

              dgodon@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
              dgodon@mastodon.onlineD This user is from outside of this forum
              dgodon@mastodon.online
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #128

              @ocean I suspect it’s not so much that they want to make quality worse, it’s that quality is just very low priority. Not that it matters much. Like other big tech monopolies, they still knowingly do deprioritize quality. I think many employees try to mitigate, but their power is also getting deliberately smashed

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • m0xee@nosh0b10.m0xee.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                m0xee@nosh0b10.m0xee.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                m0xee@nosh0b10.m0xee.net
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #129
                @WandererUber@poa.st @ocean@raru.re
                Yes, exactly! Even in its inception it was better and same as with search it got worse recently. I used to have a tab with SimplyTranslate open, it was a great tool to access Google Translate — not anymore, with languages I somewhat understand it's barely useful, I might as well use Reverso to translate some words, and with other languages — I'm not even sure the result has anything to do with original text. Even a year ago you could pull an article through it, fix a few sentences here and there and be done with it — it was good enough. Right now I'm giving it a few well-formed sentences in English — not even complex ones where it might get lost, to translate into my native language and… the result is gibberish. It can't handle passive voice at all, it's incorrect tenses, incorrect cases all over the place — this isn't a translation even, this is some word soup! A schoolkid with a dictionary translating word-for-word would do a much better job than this!
                The motive? It gives you slightly better results if you use it directly, not via API as SimplyTranslate does — here the motive is obvious, but otherwise… no, same as with search. Do they have ads in Google Translate? I don't know because I have those blocked. Does it give you better results in Google Chrome? I don't know, they might be incentivising me to use it in a way they could serve me more ads or harvest more data. I didn't do a thorough research — just sharing my observation and for me, the way I used to use it, it got noticeably worse.
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                  You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                  Turns out that was on purpose

                  toadofsky@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  toadofsky@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  toadofsky@mastodon.social
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #130

                  @ocean What I don't understand is how one can argue that Google is violating antitrust laws while also making itself less competitive.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                    You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                    Turns out that was on purpose

                    nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nicksilkey@hachyderm.io
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #131

                    @ocean sufficiently advanced capital extraction is indistinguishable from infinite rent-seeking. every 👏 single 👏 time 👏

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                      @osman @seq @morgunkorn hmm. the first email floats the idea of reducing search quality to get more queries, with a caveat of being uncomfortable about it. the rest looks like the results of projects and efforts that were ongoing at the time. am I missing a detail in that email chain that demonstrates that they actually followed through? don't get me wrong, it's gross that they even floated the idea, but if this is intended to be evidentiary proof of committal then I'm not seeing a smoking gun.

                      delroth@mastodon.delroth.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                      delroth@mastodon.delroth.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                      delroth@mastodon.delroth.net
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #132

                      @gsuberland @osman @seq @morgunkorn nah it's people jumping to conspiratorial conclusions as usual if you read the source. The email is pretty clear that it's a stupid proposal (of course you can increase queries by making the UX worse) to illustrate that query numbers are a stupid metric ("The nature of how you would easily increase queries is a key reason I don't like queries as an end metric." - can hardly be clearer).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                        You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                        Turns out that was on purpose

                        reconbot@toot.cafeR This user is from outside of this forum
                        reconbot@toot.cafeR This user is from outside of this forum
                        reconbot@toot.cafe
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #133

                        @ocean literally the head of advertising got the head of search fired

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                          @osman @seq @morgunkorn hmm. the first email floats the idea of reducing search quality to get more queries, with a caveat of being uncomfortable about it. the rest looks like the results of projects and efforts that were ongoing at the time. am I missing a detail in that email chain that demonstrates that they actually followed through? don't get me wrong, it's gross that they even floated the idea, but if this is intended to be evidentiary proof of committal then I'm not seeing a smoking gun.

                          mistermaker@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mistermaker@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mistermaker@fosstodon.org
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #134

                          @gsuberland @osman @seq @morgunkorn Pretty obvious that they kept the metric that keeps users on their website.
                          Also logical they are doing this. Now they are tuning it so it's just shit, but not shit enough that users will leave.

                          Important stuff like web search shouldn't be free.
                          I'm really eyeballing to get @kagihq it's a bit expensive atm.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                            You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                            Turns out that was on purpose

                            johnoestmannmusic@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            johnoestmannmusic@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            johnoestmannmusic@mastodon.social
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #135

                            @ocean I was literally just wondering about this. Gemini works amazing compared to search, and so they could get users to embrace AI simply by making search worse

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                              You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                              Turns out that was on purpose

                              petrichorsquirrel@meow.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              petrichorsquirrel@meow.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              petrichorsquirrel@meow.social
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #136

                              @ocean I've noticed that whenever I use google, I instinctively ignore the first 5 results because I know they will not be what I want.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                Turns out that was on purpose

                                lazysupper@famichiki.jpL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lazysupper@famichiki.jpL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lazysupper@famichiki.jp
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #137

                                @ocean
                                #degoogle

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • delve@deadinsi.deD delve@deadinsi.de

                                  @ocean Least surprising revelation of the year to be honest.

                                  I think the exact same thing is true of YouTube, which is so dominant that they can make it shittier every day and people will still use it.

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  shadsterling@mastodon.social
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #138

                                  @delve @ocean At least with YouTube you can pay to get it ad-free. Google doesn’t have a way to pay to get actually good search results

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                    You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                    Turns out that was on purpose

                                    lisa0480@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lisa0480@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lisa0480@mastodon.social
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #139

                                    @ocean Glad I've already ditched Google in favour of Qwant

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                      You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                      Turns out that was on purpose

                                      joostvb@mastodon.greenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      joostvb@mastodon.greenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      joostvb@mastodon.green
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #140

                                      enshittification explained again

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • xepia_@social.bau-ha.usX xepia_@social.bau-ha.us

                                        @morgunkorn
                                        Yup.
                                        https://archive.is/HoB1U

                                        @realhackhistory @ocean @hjoest @christianschwaegerl

                                        christianschwaegerl@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        christianschwaegerl@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        christianschwaegerl@mastodon.social
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #141

                                        @xepia_ @morgunkorn @realhackhistory @ocean @hjoest thanks

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                          You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                          Turns out that was on purpose

                                          aryamiller@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          aryamiller@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          aryamiller@mastodon.social
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #142

                                          @ocean how to #degoogle? Could you recommend another browser to me? Ths.👍

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper