Friendly reminder: last year I built FediMod FIRES, a protocol and reference server implementation for sharing moderation data.
-
@the_moep yeah, it's been difficult to get the word out because I don't have a particularly large following.
@thisismissem I took a quick look at it and there are two things I'm wondering about:
- Can this already integrate with Mastodon's FASP? If not, is that planed?
- How are identities of moderated actors/instances as well as the moderating instances protected? As far as I can tell all of that information seems to be provided in clear text which imo would result in retaliation actions being taken against the people putting an instance on the list. Something like this has happened in the Minecraft community on global banlist projects and seems to be (in a lesser form) an issue with Bluesky's public blocklists as well. (And in the email-space Spamhaus gets attacked a lot as well)
-
Friendly reminder: last year I built FediMod FIRES, a protocol and reference server implementation for sharing moderation data.
I haven't yet been able to get anyone to adopt it or even signal intent to adopt. But regularly I see people complaining about the lack of data sharing when it comes to moderation, especially for combating spam, scams, and harassment. The tool is there, please use it!
Whilst I'm not actively working on FediMod FIRES this quarter, I did apply in November for a grant to continue that work, and last I heard a few weeks ago is that the grant made it to the next stage, so I may have some money again to fund development.
It's not 1.0.0 yet, because I decided it needed more work for me to be happy to call it that, but it is usable!
Installation is also super simple for data producers, literally two commands on debian or ubuntu boxes.
Learn more: https://fires.fedimod.org/manuals/reference-server/
@thisismissem very nice
-
Friendly reminder: last year I built FediMod FIRES, a protocol and reference server implementation for sharing moderation data.
I haven't yet been able to get anyone to adopt it or even signal intent to adopt. But regularly I see people complaining about the lack of data sharing when it comes to moderation, especially for combating spam, scams, and harassment. The tool is there, please use it!
Whilst I'm not actively working on FediMod FIRES this quarter, I did apply in November for a grant to continue that work, and last I heard a few weeks ago is that the grant made it to the next stage, so I may have some money again to fund development.
It's not 1.0.0 yet, because I decided it needed more work for me to be happy to call it that, but it is usable!
Installation is also super simple for data producers, literally two commands on debian or ubuntu boxes.
Learn more: https://fires.fedimod.org/manuals/reference-server/
@thisismissem I'm going to try to say this with the most respect for you and your work.
If it is not in mastodon mainline as a feature, it might as well not exist.
The problem has never been ideas, protocols, or implementations, its always been adversarial relashionship from gargron and or the Mastodon GMBH leadership team.
They clearly do not want to prioritise this feature and many other feaures that people asked for years (hello local only post).
And the only people that can use this servers are: re-implementers, people that need a dedicated service to scale (and probbaly have multiple, high traffic instances), and hobbyist self hosters.
All the people using masto.host/ 3rd parties won't be able to use it.
Which I assume is the vast majority of the people wanting to have access to that feature in the first place.Unless Mastodon GMBH start to listen to their community (instance administrators), the complaining will continue I'm affraid.
Again, trying my best here to convey that the work you did is needed and appreciated, and that my problems are with the people holding the power here.
-
@thisismissem I took a quick look at it and there are two things I'm wondering about:
- Can this already integrate with Mastodon's FASP? If not, is that planed?
- How are identities of moderated actors/instances as well as the moderating instances protected? As far as I can tell all of that information seems to be provided in clear text which imo would result in retaliation actions being taken against the people putting an instance on the list. Something like this has happened in the Minecraft community on global banlist projects and seems to be (in a lesser form) an issue with Bluesky's public blocklists as well. (And in the email-space Spamhaus gets attacked a lot as well)
@the_moep okay, a lot of questions!
1) FediMod FIRES is not related to Mastodon's FASP protocol. You shouldn't need an active connection to a FIRES server to process incoming activities.
2) Moderation data is shared publicly. Your server needs a copy of that data in order to take action. Moderation data providers can share as much or as little data about their operations as they desire.
3) The only way to not make the moderation data clear text would be by using Differential Privacy, and I absolutely do not have the cryptography knowledge to implement that.
4) Private datasets have been requested as a feature. Need to figure out access control. Existing datasets are all public.
Hope that helps.
-
@the_moep okay, a lot of questions!
1) FediMod FIRES is not related to Mastodon's FASP protocol. You shouldn't need an active connection to a FIRES server to process incoming activities.
2) Moderation data is shared publicly. Your server needs a copy of that data in order to take action. Moderation data providers can share as much or as little data about their operations as they desire.
3) The only way to not make the moderation data clear text would be by using Differential Privacy, and I absolutely do not have the cryptography knowledge to implement that.
4) Private datasets have been requested as a feature. Need to figure out access control. Existing datasets are all public.
Hope that helps.
@the_moep FediMod FIRES is more parallel to Bluesky's Labeler infrastructure rather than blocklists
-
@thisismissem I'm going to try to say this with the most respect for you and your work.
If it is not in mastodon mainline as a feature, it might as well not exist.
The problem has never been ideas, protocols, or implementations, its always been adversarial relashionship from gargron and or the Mastodon GMBH leadership team.
They clearly do not want to prioritise this feature and many other feaures that people asked for years (hello local only post).
And the only people that can use this servers are: re-implementers, people that need a dedicated service to scale (and probbaly have multiple, high traffic instances), and hobbyist self hosters.
All the people using masto.host/ 3rd parties won't be able to use it.
Which I assume is the vast majority of the people wanting to have access to that feature in the first place.Unless Mastodon GMBH start to listen to their community (instance administrators), the complaining will continue I'm affraid.
Again, trying my best here to convey that the work you did is needed and appreciated, and that my problems are with the people holding the power here.
@mxfraud it sounds like Mastodon may be adopting the protocol, and there is other fediverse software out there besides Mastodon. But I also get your frustration.
-
Friendly reminder: last year I built FediMod FIRES, a protocol and reference server implementation for sharing moderation data.
I haven't yet been able to get anyone to adopt it or even signal intent to adopt. But regularly I see people complaining about the lack of data sharing when it comes to moderation, especially for combating spam, scams, and harassment. The tool is there, please use it!
Whilst I'm not actively working on FediMod FIRES this quarter, I did apply in November for a grant to continue that work, and last I heard a few weeks ago is that the grant made it to the next stage, so I may have some money again to fund development.
It's not 1.0.0 yet, because I decided it needed more work for me to be happy to call it that, but it is usable!
Installation is also super simple for data producers, literally two commands on debian or ubuntu boxes.
Learn more: https://fires.fedimod.org/manuals/reference-server/
-
Friendly reminder: last year I built FediMod FIRES, a protocol and reference server implementation for sharing moderation data.
I haven't yet been able to get anyone to adopt it or even signal intent to adopt. But regularly I see people complaining about the lack of data sharing when it comes to moderation, especially for combating spam, scams, and harassment. The tool is there, please use it!
Whilst I'm not actively working on FediMod FIRES this quarter, I did apply in November for a grant to continue that work, and last I heard a few weeks ago is that the grant made it to the next stage, so I may have some money again to fund development.
It's not 1.0.0 yet, because I decided it needed more work for me to be happy to call it that, but it is usable!
Installation is also super simple for data producers, literally two commands on debian or ubuntu boxes.
Learn more: https://fires.fedimod.org/manuals/reference-server/
@thisismissem can I theoretically use this as a housekeeping tool for blocking all ActivityPub nodes of a certain type, e.g., Lemmy, Piefed, Gotosocial, or is there an easier way to do that? How about blocking all users with blank pfp?
Thanks
-
@thisismissem can I theoretically use this as a housekeeping tool for blocking all ActivityPub nodes of a certain type, e.g., Lemmy, Piefed, Gotosocial, or is there an easier way to do that? How about blocking all users with blank pfp?
Thanks
@andrew it's not designed for that.
For automatically moderating profiles with no avatar, it'd be as your server learns about them, which could be done using a rails script for mastodon.
-
@andrew it's not designed for that.
For automatically moderating profiles with no avatar, it'd be as your server learns about them, which could be done using a rails script for mastodon.
@thisismissem thanks!
-
P pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
