Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Google replaced pushing Git tags for certain source code with obtaining source code via Google Drive after making a request through Google Forms.

Google replaced pushing Git tags for certain source code with obtaining source code via Google Drive after making a request through Google Forms.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
58 Indlæg 33 Posters 28 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    Google replaced pushing Git tags for certain source code with obtaining source code via Google Drive after making a request through Google Forms. It's completely ridiculous and they've gradually become very slow at handling requests. They're in clear violation of the GPLv2 now.

    andreacapezza@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    andreacapezza@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    andreacapezza@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #41

    @GrapheneOS Google is a devil, he is not the first ( IBM ? ) and the last is not born ... Nous n'avons que ce que nous méritons

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • srevilo@mastodon.socialS srevilo@mastodon.social

      @GrapheneOS Will there be Motorola Smartphones with GrapheneOS preinstalled available? Thanks in advance.

      minibill@mastodon.unoM This user is from outside of this forum
      minibill@mastodon.unoM This user is from outside of this forum
      minibill@mastodon.uno
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #42

      @srevilo @GrapheneOS yes, they have a partnership for doing exactly that

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • vrtrahan@lgbtqia.spaceV vrtrahan@lgbtqia.space

        @GrapheneOS On a separate note... Someone please tell me what are the exact things stopping a more open OS like linux from being mainstream (modem drivers, camera drivers, what else?)

        Or... an AOSP derivative or clone COMPLETELY independent. IK has something to do with the modem and SIM-card and camera drivers, what are those and what else?

        falken@social.falkensweb.comF This user is from outside of this forum
        falken@social.falkensweb.comF This user is from outside of this forum
        falken@social.falkensweb.com
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #43

        @vrtrahan @GrapheneOS banks and other apps locking themselves when not running on a "secure version of Android" or depending on non-OS features like Play Services

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

          For Motorola devices, we plan to prepare our releases early and have everything ready for major Android updates at launch. We should be able to simply push the code to our own repositories for major Android releases. We'll need to host all the AOSP Git repositories ourselves.

          bolomkxxviii@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bolomkxxviii@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bolomkxxviii@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #44

          @GrapheneOS
          Not that long ago, I couldn't see myself purchasing a Motorola phone. Their reputation for poor OS support (security updates and OS updates) made purchasing one of their phones a non-starter. Now, with the GrapheneOS partnership, I can't wait to purchase a Motorola/GrapheneOS phone. I am enjoying my Pixel 8a with GrapheneOS, but the hardware is a bit limiting. I definitely need more storage space.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

            @cismonx It's incredibly backwards and very hard to understand why they want to drive away people from using their devices.

            Nexus and Pixel devices had a lot of Android enthusiasts using them who are increasingly being driven away by these decisions.

            They're driving a lot of people away to using iPhones rather than simply using other Android devices.

            The management making these decisions largely use iPhones, not the products they're gradually stripping of their actual advantages.

            dethos@s.ovalerio.netD This user is from outside of this forum
            dethos@s.ovalerio.netD This user is from outside of this forum
            dethos@s.ovalerio.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #45

            @GrapheneOS @cismonx is it hard to understand? Really?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

              These changes won't negatively impact GrapheneOS on upcoming Motorola Mobility devices. In fact, it's a major part of why our partnership exists. It only negatively impacts Pixels and hurts Google more than anyone else. Google wants to make Pixels worse for no apparent reason.

              the_universality@mastodon.novotnykrystof.comT This user is from outside of this forum
              the_universality@mastodon.novotnykrystof.comT This user is from outside of this forum
              the_universality@mastodon.novotnykrystof.com
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #46

              @GrapheneOS This reminds me, how's is the Motorola partnership going on?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                For Motorola devices, we plan to prepare our releases early and have everything ready for major Android updates at launch. We should be able to simply push the code to our own repositories for major Android releases. We'll need to host all the AOSP Git repositories ourselves.

                L This user is from outside of this forum
                L This user is from outside of this forum
                l0gin@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #47

                @GrapheneOS are there some members of the grapheneos-team who like the born-again trend of upcomming qwerty phones? — as some of the hype also got its shape from ppl and ultimately clicks adding a keyboard to a closed flip-foldable, it seems like there could be some human engineering and convincing some peaple at certain phone manufacturer that it would be so so great to have a graphene qwerty phone 🌚🌚

                And... 🌚 a 3.5" screen does visualize less of your private information than a 6" screen XD

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                  Google replaced pushing Git tags for certain source code with obtaining source code via Google Drive after making a request through Google Forms. It's completely ridiculous and they've gradually become very slow at handling requests. They're in clear violation of the GPLv2 now.

                  kouett@soc.kouett.net.eu.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kouett@soc.kouett.net.eu.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kouett@soc.kouett.net.eu.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #48
                  @GrapheneOS wait it's real??? sounds like a joke ._.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • danieldk@mastodon.socialD danieldk@mastodon.social

                    @GrapheneOS if the paper contains many inaccuracies, maybe it's a good idea to contact the authors and editors to get it retracted?

                    wod0bow@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wod0bow@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wod0bow@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #49

                    @danieldk @GrapheneOS I think that this kind of inaccuracies are intentional. This "work" looks like a slop that was made with premeditaion. I have also doubt if there was any review before publishing this slop.

                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #50

                      @xyhhx @vrtrahan @GrapheneOS plus vendor buy-in. It's very hard to make a driver without documentation on the hardware and that's usually not freely available

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lattera@bsd.networkL lattera@bsd.network

                        @eatham @GrapheneOS The GPLv2 does not place any stipulation on schedules and deadlines.

                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #51

                        @lattera @eatham It doesn't have to explicitly specify any time constraint for it to be required to provide it in a reasonable amount of time. Law is not code and doesn't depend on everything being explicitly written down. Google is a massive tech company with enormous resources. They clearly made these changes to make it a hassle to obtain the sources. By not quickly responding to the requests and dealing with it, they're artificially delaying access and that's a violation of the license.

                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                          @lattera @eatham It doesn't have to explicitly specify any time constraint for it to be required to provide it in a reasonable amount of time. Law is not code and doesn't depend on everything being explicitly written down. Google is a massive tech company with enormous resources. They clearly made these changes to make it a hassle to obtain the sources. By not quickly responding to the requests and dealing with it, they're artificially delaying access and that's a violation of the license.

                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #52

                          @lattera @eatham Aside from that, not providing it in the form of Git repositories is not providing it in the preferred form for modifying the source code. Android's tooling is based around dealing with Git repositories. Even if they strip all the history, it should still be tags in Git repositories so stuff works properly and it's split up into separate repositories in the way they did themselves. The build system uses Git revisions. It has a fallback to use a metadata file which they provide.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • wod0bow@mastodon.socialW wod0bow@mastodon.social

                            @danieldk @GrapheneOS I think that this kind of inaccuracies are intentional. This "work" looks like a slop that was made with premeditaion. I have also doubt if there was any review before publishing this slop.

                            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #53

                            @wod0bow @danieldk It was funded by a grant from Google, one of the authors is from Google and it lists 4 reviewers from Google. It fits neatly into Google defending banning GrapheneOS with the Play Integrity API in Europe. There's going to be a lot more of a response from us than what we already did if they don't retract or correct it soon.

                            wod0bow@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                              For Motorola devices, we plan to prepare our releases early and have everything ready for major Android updates at launch. We should be able to simply push the code to our own repositories for major Android releases. We'll need to host all the AOSP Git repositories ourselves.

                              hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #54

                              @GrapheneOS i'm so unbelievably hype for the motorola devices

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • I idkrn@infosec.exchange

                                @GrapheneOS since when?

                                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #55

                                @idkrn They started doing this for Pixel kernel drivers after the initial release of Android 16.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                  For Motorola devices, we plan to prepare our releases early and have everything ready for major Android updates at launch. We should be able to simply push the code to our own repositories for major Android releases. We'll need to host all the AOSP Git repositories ourselves.

                                  nicoduck@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nicoduck@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nicoduck@chaos.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #56

                                  @GrapheneOS when do you change the recommendation for devices on your website?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                    Google replaced pushing Git tags for certain source code with obtaining source code via Google Drive after making a request through Google Forms. It's completely ridiculous and they've gradually become very slow at handling requests. They're in clear violation of the GPLv2 now.

                                    disorderlyf@todon.euD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    disorderlyf@todon.euD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    disorderlyf@todon.eu
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #57

                                    @GrapheneOS I get the feeling it's not an easy feat to be in violation of GPL2

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                      @wod0bow @danieldk It was funded by a grant from Google, one of the authors is from Google and it lists 4 reviewers from Google. It fits neatly into Google defending banning GrapheneOS with the Play Integrity API in Europe. There's going to be a lot more of a response from us than what we already did if they don't retract or correct it soon.

                                      wod0bow@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wod0bow@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wod0bow@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #58

                                      @GrapheneOS @danieldk Almost all banking apps in EU are based on GMS. Govs apps require GMS. MasterCard Visa removed simcentric payments and also their own HCE payments and replace that with GooglePay. EU dosn't give a F about that... And right now Google is takimg narration in EU about Android security. More over false narration.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
                                      Svar
                                      • Svar som emne
                                      Login for at svare
                                      • Ældste til nyeste
                                      • Nyeste til ældste
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Log ind

                                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Hjem
                                      • Seneste
                                      • Etiketter
                                      • Populære
                                      • Verden
                                      • Bruger
                                      • Grupper