Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Remember, kids:

Remember, kids:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
psaevolutionglobalwarmingdeadinternetthescience
26 Indlæg 16 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

    @juergen_hubert
    Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
    It was a theory until last century.

    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #13

    @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

    swoonie@mastodon.ieS androcat@toot.catA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

      Remember, kids:

      In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

      It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

      This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

      #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

      nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
      nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
      nini@oldbytes.space
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #14

      @juergen_hubert Probably too many syllables in that ten dollar word you got there, "theory" works the same don't it? /s

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

        @juergen_hubert
        Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
        It was a theory until last century.

        khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        khleedril@cyberplace.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #15

        @swoonie @juergen_hubert Yeh, this is the one example given in the OP that I wouldn't apply the word 'theory' to. It was conjecture at one time, maybe a hypothesis at some point, but it is a fact that global warming is happening, not a theory.

        There are theories I've heard that it is something to do with burning fossil fuels...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

          Remember, kids:

          In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

          It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

          This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

          #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

          drukac@mementomori.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          drukac@mementomori.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          drukac@mementomori.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #16

          @juergen_hubert
          Yes, but then we have things like terrain theory which...eesh.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

            @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

            swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
            swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
            swoonie@mastodon.ie
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #17

            @lritter @juergen_hubert
            It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
            We know this for sure. Period.

            juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

              @juergen_hubert
              Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
              It was a theory until last century.

              mattesilver@101010.plM This user is from outside of this forum
              mattesilver@101010.plM This user is from outside of this forum
              mattesilver@101010.pl
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #18

              @swoonie

              the science is settled (tm)

              @juergen_hubert

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                @lritter @juergen_hubert
                It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                We know this for sure. Period.

                juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #19

                @swoonie @lritter

                And that's what makes it a scientific theory.

                The "facts" are the observations. The "theory" is the tested explanation for those observations.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                  @lritter @juergen_hubert
                  It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                  We know this for sure. Period.

                  lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #20

                  @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                  > based on *a hypothesis* that was first formulated in the 19th century

                  fixed that for you.

                  to be even clearer this time: you use the word "theory" wrong, like many people and politicians do.

                  swoonie@mastodon.ieS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                    @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                    > based on *a hypothesis* that was first formulated in the 19th century

                    fixed that for you.

                    to be even clearer this time: you use the word "theory" wrong, like many people and politicians do.

                    swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                    swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                    swoonie@mastodon.ie
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #21

                    @lritter @juergen_hubert
                    If your use of the word “theory” confuses everyone, then it is a confusing use of this word and should be avoided.

                    Even if You Know You Are Right™.

                    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                      @lritter @juergen_hubert
                      If your use of the word “theory” confuses everyone, then it is a confusing use of this word and should be avoided.

                      Even if You Know You Are Right™.

                      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #22

                      @swoonie @juergen_hubert tomorrow it's going to hit a word that matters to you professionally, as punishment for what you just said.

                      swoonie@mastodon.ieS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                        @swoonie @juergen_hubert tomorrow it's going to hit a word that matters to you professionally, as punishment for what you just said.

                        swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                        swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                        swoonie@mastodon.ie
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #23

                        @lritter @juergen_hubert
                        Gotta get on with my day now, buddy.
                        Have a good one!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                          @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

                          androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                          androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                          androcat@toot.cat
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #24

                          @lritter

                          You can't observe a theory.

                          What we observe is facts.

                          The explanation we tack onto it is a theory.

                          Most of evolution is the facts. We can literally see evolution happening.
                          Those facts are not a theory, they're the bar any theory has to get over.

                          Climate change, likewise, is observable fact. And any theory of climate will have to incorporate those facts and explain them.

                          Does that clear it up?

                          @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • androcat@toot.catA androcat@toot.cat

                            @lritter

                            You can't observe a theory.

                            What we observe is facts.

                            The explanation we tack onto it is a theory.

                            Most of evolution is the facts. We can literally see evolution happening.
                            Those facts are not a theory, they're the bar any theory has to get over.

                            Climate change, likewise, is observable fact. And any theory of climate will have to incorporate those facts and explain them.

                            Does that clear it up?

                            @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #25

                            @androcat @swoonie @juergen_hubert in your words, what is the difference between hypothesis and theory?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                              Remember, kids:

                              In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                              It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                              This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                              #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                              malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              malte@radikal.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #26

                              @juergen_hubert Good reminder! One thing I'm missing from your description: Can you have competing scientific theories in your definition? I'm reminded of Kuhn's concept of paradigms which entails that there is always some conflicting evidence that any paradigm tends to dismiss (as noise, mistakes etc). Paradigms tend to shift when the conflicting evidence becomes overwhelming and a new theory manages to account for those previous exceptions.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper