Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
-
@alterelefant @dansup This is not possible. Their post will not be shown in your timeline anymore but you can't delete messages somebody else has written on his/her instance.
@dnkrupinski
Will those replies to your posts still be visible for others who view your posts?* your post *
* reply by blocked person " -
@dnkrupinski
Will those replies to your posts still be visible for others who view your posts?* your post *
* reply by blocked person "@alterelefant @dnkrupinski I think it should be removed as a reply, but still visible from the permalink
-
@dnkrupinski @alterelefant You can Reject it, which should unlink it from the parent post, this does need support from software, I am working on this in Pixelfed and Loops!
@dansup
You would indeed expect the post and reply to get unlinked. One can not remove a post made by someone else, that is clear. However you do expect the relationship between a post and a reply of a blocked person to go away.
@dnkrupinski -
@alterelefant @dnkrupinski I think it should be removed as a reply, but still visible from the permalink
@dansup
A permalink is always final, the reply will still exist, just the reference to the original post should be removed.I am not quite sure how to enforce such a thing in a federated system? A bad actor instance could still choose to ignore the unlink request and show the cached post in relationship with the reply. In some extreme cases they might even make changes to the software on their end. Such bad actor instances are typically run by ultra right wing oriented people.
@dnkrupinski -
@alterelefant @dansup This is not possible. Their post will not be shown in your timeline anymore but you can't delete messages somebody else has written on his/her instance.
@dnkrupinski@hannover.town @alterelefant@mastodontech.de @dansup@mastodon.social it might be possible to at least purge the local copy, and prevent it from getting federated along with every other reply from the source.
Sure, anyone subscribed to the blocked person will still see the response and probably distribute it along, but it might be nice to have a way to block it at the top level.
-
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
@dansup I’m unsure how far this should go. I’m a free speech absolutist but I also respect the right to ignore, which blocking achieves.
A sticky problem. If I was designing something in this space I’d probably leave replies visible on the TL but flag them conspicuously as being from a blocked account.
Messy. I don’t like my idea either.
-
@dansup That is indeed what you expect. I have never tested it, as in, had no need to block anyone yet. Yes you would think a block should remove all replies made by that person to your posts.
@alterelefant @dansup On your instance - yes. Do you want to alert their instance about it, however? What if it’s a modified instance that ignores and logs such requests for their perusal? What if they are obsessive?
ActivityPub recommends to not send out Block activities, which mastodon deliberately ignores - https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/activitypub/#Block
IMO users need to be warned about this when they try to block, because it has implications that are especially dangerous for those who most need the feature.
-
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
@dansup I get the intention, but with that implementation, fedi becomes a propaganda platform where everyone can post any shit and just delete anyone calling it out as such.
I rather live with unwanted comments under my posts. -
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
@dansup I kinda disagree here. I get the intention but personal blocks should only apply to your account, not others. (This also would effectively make block lists public which Bluesky has shown us to be a major cause for concern)
What you describe should only apply to accounts banned on the instance the OP is on (so they can't see posts and should not be able to reply to them (although this does not solve simply screenshoting/linking but at least prevents direct harassment))
-
@dansup I get the intention, but with that implementation, fedi becomes a propaganda platform where everyone can post any shit and just delete anyone calling it out as such.
I rather live with unwanted comments under my posts.@Schafstelze @dansup indeed, this is insanely dangerous, all someone has to do to spread misinformation or even flat out libel without contest if you could remove replies is block anyone who disagrees with them. You have the right to choose what you see, but that shouldn't extend to choosing what other people see.
-
@dansup That is indeed what you expect. I have never tested it, as in, had no need to block anyone yet. Yes you would think a block should remove all replies made by that person to your posts.
@alterelefant @dansup No, this is no expected, a block has always only prevented you from reading what people write on all platforms, only bans remove their posts (or direct moderator action to remove posts).
A user should not be able to do such destructive actions to the global conversation on platforms run by other people, only on platforms were thet have such permissions (and with that some legal association with the platform operator) themselves.
-
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
@dansup Agreed. Pretty much every platform that I am on supports this, including most FOSS platforms. It is a widely support basic moderation tool.
Every time it comes up, you'll get replies worrying about the theoretical risks, but Mastodon is like.. the only place that doesn't do this.
In my mind this is exactly like how Bluesky devs hem and haw about editing posts.
Everything allows for this, and those platforms are fine. We can just do it.
-
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
Just an idea (maybe not a good one) - What if blocking someone flags all their responses to the post as "blocked by original poster" so everyone knows this person was blocked. If readers agree that the person was inappropriate, abusive, or just downright toxic they can block them too, and if enough people block them the account is suspended/dissolved.
-
@dansup Agreed. Pretty much every platform that I am on supports this, including most FOSS platforms. It is a widely support basic moderation tool.
Every time it comes up, you'll get replies worrying about the theoretical risks, but Mastodon is like.. the only place that doesn't do this.
In my mind this is exactly like how Bluesky devs hem and haw about editing posts.
Everything allows for this, and those platforms are fine. We can just do it.
@dansup It's particularly frustrating that so much of the conversation around the fediverse boils down to "but what about debate."
I use this platform as an artist. People/critters use this platform to talk to friends, to make new friends, to ask questions and get advice.
All of that stuff relies on being able to moderate our own threads, and it's not worth making all of that worse just because the critters on here specifically only to debate things might theoretically have a harder time.
-
@dansup It's particularly frustrating that so much of the conversation around the fediverse boils down to "but what about debate."
I use this platform as an artist. People/critters use this platform to talk to friends, to make new friends, to ask questions and get advice.
All of that stuff relies on being able to moderate our own threads, and it's not worth making all of that worse just because the critters on here specifically only to debate things might theoretically have a harder time.
@dansup the fediverse is so much BIGGER than just accounts going "debate me bro", and like.. we're making the space actively worse because a tiny subset of the users believe they have inalienable right to post comments on other critters blogs. It just doesn't make sense.
I moderate comments under my artwork to enforce content warnings for fetish art and to keep followers safe from seeing replies that might disturb them.
Most of the comments I remove on my galleries aren't bannable offenses.
-
@dansup the fediverse is so much BIGGER than just accounts going "debate me bro", and like.. we're making the space actively worse because a tiny subset of the users believe they have inalienable right to post comments on other critters blogs. It just doesn't make sense.
I moderate comments under my artwork to enforce content warnings for fetish art and to keep followers safe from seeing replies that might disturb them.
Most of the comments I remove on my galleries aren't bannable offenses.
@dansup so we've created a system on platforms like Mastodon that is considerably worse for artists, hobbyists, specialized accounts.. that removes a really important tool (one that I have access to on literally every single one of my other galleries)..
For a risk that is still pretty largely theoretical. Like, if you disagree with somepony and they block, write a blog post about it and share it in your own timeline like we used to do on the Internet.
-
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
@dansup
LinkedIn was horrible for many reasons (I quit the platform more than a year ago).But there was at least one thing they did right: for threads/posts you started yourself, they let you delete comments from other users.
I haven't had a need for that here. It'd be a nice option to have, though.
-
Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!
@dansup you cannot dictate others if they can talk or not, or whether they can say their opinion . If you do, I will fork the application accepting it, and remove the feature. So I can say what I think of your post.
Nice try, you fascist.
-
@dnkrupinski@hannover.town @alterelefant@mastodontech.de @dansup@mastodon.social it might be possible to at least purge the local copy, and prevent it from getting federated along with every other reply from the source.
Sure, anyone subscribed to the blocked person will still see the response and probably distribute it along, but it might be nice to have a way to block it at the top level.
@deadsuperhero @dansup @alterelefant
Don't understand how this can be done for _foreign messages_ which are not blocked on the same instance?
If i block someone on hannover.town, than all others on hannover.town should not be able to see the messages of the blocked account?
This is a blocked account on a instance. This can only be done by moderaters / owners of the instance. This needs a violation of the rules of the instance or an unpropriate behavior of the blocked account. Otherwise it would be censorship.
-
@dansup
A permalink is always final, the reply will still exist, just the reference to the original post should be removed.I am not quite sure how to enforce such a thing in a federated system? A bad actor instance could still choose to ignore the unlink request and show the cached post in relationship with the reply. In some extreme cases they might even make changes to the software on their end. Such bad actor instances are typically run by ultra right wing oriented people.
@dnkrupinski@alterelefant @dansup @dnkrupinski
Yes but a bad actor can also just edit their post to include a link to or screenshot of the original one.
Nothing will be a perfect solution but increasing friction that needs to be overcome to harass someone will reduce harassment since not everyone is equally dedicated to being a pain in the ass.
