Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Remember, kids:

Remember, kids:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
psaevolutionglobalwarmingdeadinternetthescience
26 Indlæg 16 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Remember, kids:

    In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

    It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

    This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

    #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

    ljwrites@writeout.inkL fatboy@fosstodon.orgF deedo@mastodon.nlD uastronomer@mastodon.monoceros.co.zaU T 11 Replies Last reply
    0
    • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

      Remember, kids:

      In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

      It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

      This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

      #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

      ljwrites@writeout.inkL This user is from outside of this forum
      ljwrites@writeout.inkL This user is from outside of this forum
      ljwrites@writeout.ink
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @juergen_hubert The people who try to discount evolution for being "just a theory" should also feel free to discount gravity for being "just a theory."

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

        Remember, kids:

        In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

        It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

        This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

        #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

        fatboy@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
        fatboy@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
        fatboy@fosstodon.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @juergen_hubert well said!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

          Remember, kids:

          In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

          It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

          This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

          #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

          deedo@mastodon.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
          deedo@mastodon.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
          deedo@mastodon.nl
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @juergen_hubert it goes the other way around as well. "No correlation has been found between doing X and outcome Y."

          "See! They can't prove it's false, gotcha!"

          Used in medicine a lot...

          mehrad@fosstodon.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

            Remember, kids:

            In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

            It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

            This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

            #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

            uastronomer@mastodon.monoceros.co.zaU This user is from outside of this forum
            uastronomer@mastodon.monoceros.co.zaU This user is from outside of this forum
            uastronomer@mastodon.monoceros.co.za
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @juergen_hubert A thought occurs: Older theories are often referred to as laws. Newton's laws of motion. The laws of thermodynamics. Presumably a relic from older and more confident ways of thinking about truth, but the problem is that we *still* call them laws.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • deedo@mastodon.nlD deedo@mastodon.nl

              @juergen_hubert it goes the other way around as well. "No correlation has been found between doing X and outcome Y."

              "See! They can't prove it's false, gotcha!"

              Used in medicine a lot...

              mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mehrad@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mehrad@fosstodon.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @deedo
              Exactly. Although, in general using correlation to "prove" (and by extension "disprove") something is a very slippery slope at best. I always use this example when I'm explaining correlation:

              There is a perfect positive correlation between "being married" and "getting divorce", and even higher correlation between "being born" and "death", as you cannot have the latter without the former, and yet, neither means causality.

              @juergen_hubert

              deedo@mastodon.nlD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mehrad@fosstodon.orgM mehrad@fosstodon.org

                @deedo
                Exactly. Although, in general using correlation to "prove" (and by extension "disprove") something is a very slippery slope at best. I always use this example when I'm explaining correlation:

                There is a perfect positive correlation between "being married" and "getting divorce", and even higher correlation between "being born" and "death", as you cannot have the latter without the former, and yet, neither means causality.

                @juergen_hubert

                deedo@mastodon.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
                deedo@mastodon.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
                deedo@mastodon.nl
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @Mehrad @juergen_hubert haha, I realized that and chose to stick with this wording anyway.

                But it's exactly this nuance and wording in probabilities instead of black and white exclamations! that gets misunderstood.

                I mean, "vaccines kill!¨ is so easily put. And science says: "Technically you are correct that in some cases ..."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                  Remember, kids:

                  In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                  It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                  This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                  #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  tribactam@social.vivaldi.net
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @juergen_hubert

                  Sorry to be a pedant, a Law is the hardest it gets. You can't fuck around with the Laws of Gravity.
                  Theories come and go and many are a work in progress: some withstand the test of experiment and observation better than others as the theory gets better and better at explaining all the facets of a phenomenon. However, as far as lay people are concerned, science as a constantly moving feast goes against the absolutism promoted by many non-scientists to justify the shit they come out with.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • uastronomer@mastodon.monoceros.co.zaU uastronomer@mastodon.monoceros.co.za

                    @juergen_hubert A thought occurs: Older theories are often referred to as laws. Newton's laws of motion. The laws of thermodynamics. Presumably a relic from older and more confident ways of thinking about truth, but the problem is that we *still* call them laws.

                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    tribactam@social.vivaldi.net
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @uastronomer @juergen_hubert

                    No Allen, the laws of thermodynamics, motion etc are mathematically describable. That's what makes them Laws. This is not a problem: the mathematical relationship is always that. There is no conjecture.

                    Note that the word Law is applied to really fundamental things like gravity, motion etc.

                    Hooke's Law - describes the behaviour of a spring under load. It never changes and applies to all springs, with the proviso that the elastic constant will depend on the material. But that's experimentally verificable.

                    Many of these physical Laws (and chemical Laws) were elaborated in the 17th-19th Century. It wasn't a case of more confidence (think about their instruments compared to our), it was a case of observation-measurement over many cases.

                    In contrast, only certain aspects of evolution are mathematically certain, the difference being that evolution refers to complex systems whereas a spring is a spring.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                      Remember, kids:

                      In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                      It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                      This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                      #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                      bamfingle@cyberplace.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bamfingle@cyberplace.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bamfingle@cyberplace.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @juergen_hubert All hail science!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                        Remember, kids:

                        In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                        It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                        This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                        #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                        swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                        swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                        swoonie@mastodon.ie
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #11

                        @juergen_hubert
                        Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
                        It was a theory until last century.

                        lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL khleedril@cyberplace.socialK mattesilver@101010.plM 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                          Remember, kids:

                          In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                          It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                          This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                          #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #12

                          @juergen_hubert not sure we're going to be able to fix the colloquial fubar of this one.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                            @juergen_hubert
                            Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
                            It was a theory until last century.

                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #13

                            @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

                            swoonie@mastodon.ieS androcat@toot.catA 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                              Remember, kids:

                              In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                              It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                              This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                              #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                              nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nini@oldbytes.space
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #14

                              @juergen_hubert Probably too many syllables in that ten dollar word you got there, "theory" works the same don't it? /s

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                                @juergen_hubert
                                Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
                                It was a theory until last century.

                                khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khleedril@cyberplace.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #15

                                @swoonie @juergen_hubert Yeh, this is the one example given in the OP that I wouldn't apply the word 'theory' to. It was conjecture at one time, maybe a hypothesis at some point, but it is a fact that global warming is happening, not a theory.

                                There are theories I've heard that it is something to do with burning fossil fuels...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                                  Remember, kids:

                                  In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                                  It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                                  This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                                  #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                                  drukac@mementomori.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  drukac@mementomori.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  drukac@mementomori.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #16

                                  @juergen_hubert
                                  Yes, but then we have things like terrain theory which...eesh.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                    @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

                                    swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    swoonie@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #17

                                    @lritter @juergen_hubert
                                    It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                                    We know this for sure. Period.

                                    juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                                      @juergen_hubert
                                      Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
                                      It was a theory until last century.

                                      mattesilver@101010.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mattesilver@101010.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mattesilver@101010.pl
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #18

                                      @swoonie

                                      the science is settled (tm)

                                      @juergen_hubert

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                                        @lritter @juergen_hubert
                                        It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                                        We know this for sure. Period.

                                        juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #19

                                        @swoonie @lritter

                                        And that's what makes it a scientific theory.

                                        The "facts" are the observations. The "theory" is the tested explanation for those observations.

                                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                                          @lritter @juergen_hubert
                                          It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                                          We know this for sure. Period.

                                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #20

                                          @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                                          > based on *a hypothesis* that was first formulated in the 19th century

                                          fixed that for you.

                                          to be even clearer this time: you use the word "theory" wrong, like many people and politicians do.

                                          swoonie@mastodon.ieS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper