Microsoft exec suggests AI agents will need to buy software licenses, just like employees https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-executive-suggests-ai-agents-buy-software-licenses-seats-2026-4

[bakachu@infosec.exchange]

@cwebber how else will the stock price continue to go up when all the human workers are replaced?

[flipper@mastodonapp.uk]

@cwebber this is the Onion, right? Please be the Onion.

[kkarhan@jorts.horse]

@cwebber If that's not yet another reason to ditch #AIslop and #Microsoft then IDK what is.

• I mean, these value-removing & greedy assholes literally want not just Per-Core #Licensing for their #Server Software but also in case of #Virtualization demand to account for all cores of the host hardware, not just the ones made available to the #VM.
  • Which is so absurd that I want regulators to actually clamp down on that and ban that bs term.

That's why I don't do #MicroSlop!

[medeavanamonde@beige.party]

@cwebber

https://youtu.be/S5ZSDCvUwN8?si=5Ov3JyvVSThHh7oO

[angiebaby@mas.to]

@cwebber Wait until we teach AI about Quiet Quitting.

[miss_rodent@girlcock.club]

@cwebber So chatbots are employees, but gig workers are not, is what the industry is aiming towards?

[wordshaper@weatherishappening.network]

@cwebber if Microsoft is going to charge license fees for agents using their software I can only assume that Oracle sales reps are busy inventing a whole new branch of mathematics to calculate their AI licensing fees.

[brokar@mastodon.social]

@cwebber Haha yeah, or steal or pirate the software like any other AI steals and pirates content from the internet.

AI really makes them come up with the weirdest ideas ...

Anyone thought that in order to purchase a license one must have funds to do so. Would you provide your account or credit card data to an AI?
Didn't think so.

[aud@fire.asta.lgbt]

@cwebber@social.coop ho ho, where'd I put that "they're just waiting for you to start relying on them and they'll raise the price" post... oh, I wrote that multiple times? and so did others? hmmm, strange...

[edelruth@mastodon.online]

@cwebber

Okay. Non-tech person here. I had thought AI agents were a piece of software. So, that's wrong, these are humans?

If this tiny query needs a book series to explain it, just refer me to wiki.

[crowbriarhexe@tech.lgbt]

@alice @cwebber hey, it’s “per-seat” licensing, not “occupied seat” ‍️

[alice@mk.nyaa.place]

@crowbriarhexe@tech.lgbt @cwebber@social.coop i propose that we require buying a chair for every slop agent

[traecer@techhub.social]

@cwebber the grift begins anew!

[lispi314@udongein.xyz]

@cwebber What an absurd situation.

[aud@fire.asta.lgbt]

@cwebber@social.coop it's kind of wild that all these people who consider themselves absolutely brilliant at business, numbers, software, etc, absolutely fail to understand that when "the first taste is free" you probably don't want to invest heavily into what they're selling

[deutrino@mstdn.io]

@cwebber so fucking glad I ejected from that entire poisoned ecosystem *checks watch* 18 years ago now

[ramin_hal9001@fe.disroot.org]

@alice
Are you a chair manufacturer?
I'll lobby congress on your behalf to pass law requiring every AI agent have their own physical chair... for a fee equal to 1 percent of your eminent billion dollar goverment contract.


@crowbriarhexe @cwebber

[ag7gm@mastodon.radio]

@cwebber That's hilarious. Who's going to *make them* purchase instead of pirate it? The folks that taught them to not lie, er, I mean hallucinate?

Yeah. Give your head a shake.

[ramin_hal9001@fe.disroot.org]

> AI really makes them come up with the weirdest ideas

@Brokar to me, these weird ideas they come up with is evidence that they don't have a plan or a business model to earn profits (apart from selling AI to fascist dictatorships for mass surveillance) and are desperate to recoup the losses in their investments, and prevent the bubble from bursting.

@cwebber

[landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@cwebber I, for one, am determined to make sure that all 0 of my AI agents are properly licensed.