Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
172 Indlæg 109 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    After modelling this in detail, I can say that that these companies can't even do basic geometry, apparently. They want tens of thousands of satellites to have 24 hour sunlight, so sun-synchronous terminator orbits, baybeeee!

    But as Hugh Lewis pointed out (I know, ew, linkedin sorry) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sun-always-shines-tv-hugh-lewis-tlkbe/ IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK unless you're above 1400km altitude. And then you're not in the *magical* low-latency low-altitude zone that these companies actually want for fast comms.

    mathaetaes@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    mathaetaes@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
    mathaetaes@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #16

    @sundogplanets This is going to turn into another Theranos-level investor scam... lots of money burned, outrageous salaries for the executives and folks involved pocketing tons of money and ultimately failing.

    Unlike Theranos, the CEO of Reflect Orbital is a man so he'll get away with less scrutiny, and probably won't face consequences.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      This company also posted an ex parte filing (which means they had a super special extra FCC meeting), their satellites are too fucking huge to even be physically possible. They just can't fucking do this.

      My estimate from looking at this ridiculous sketch is 8x60x10m solar panels... that's a reflecting area of 4800 m^2. The International Space Station, the biggest thing in orbit, has a solar panel area of about 3400 m^2.

      mmdolbow@mapstodon.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
      mmdolbow@mapstodon.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
      mmdolbow@mapstodon.space
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #17

      @sundogplanets they probably put one of those Spinal Tap blokes in charge of the design

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • naturemc@mastodon.onlineN naturemc@mastodon.online

        @ScottMGS exactly. Dogs are social animals. @sundogplanets

        scottmgs@justme.masto.hostS This user is from outside of this forum
        scottmgs@justme.masto.hostS This user is from outside of this forum
        scottmgs@justme.masto.host
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #18

        @NatureMC @sundogplanets 😏 So are people!

        naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • andy@social.4142.ioA andy@social.4142.io

          @sundogplanets How much of this sort of thing (these guys, Reflect Orbital, etc.) do you think is just VCs throwing money at something they think is cool, with the companies behind it knowing it'll never work? And how much is just plain idiocy in action, with them genuinely believing it WILL work?

          hayiwena@mastodon.onlineH This user is from outside of this forum
          hayiwena@mastodon.onlineH This user is from outside of this forum
          hayiwena@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #19

          @andy @sundogplanets It's a tale as old as The Emperor's New Clothes. Although in that story it's the emperor who's the bad guy not the tailor taking money from a vain emperor.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

            Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

            What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

            mschfr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mschfr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mschfr@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #20

            @sundogplanets It's still insane that one national agency can approve something like that that has an effect on every country and every other human on this planet.

            jonsaenzagirre@mastodon.eusJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

              A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

              murodegrizeco@toad.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              murodegrizeco@toad.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              murodegrizeco@toad.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #21

              @sundogplanets

              This stuff makes no business or even physical sense.

              Thus it's a psychological operation?

              crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                After modelling this in detail, I can say that that these companies can't even do basic geometry, apparently. They want tens of thousands of satellites to have 24 hour sunlight, so sun-synchronous terminator orbits, baybeeee!

                But as Hugh Lewis pointed out (I know, ew, linkedin sorry) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sun-always-shines-tv-hugh-lewis-tlkbe/ IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK unless you're above 1400km altitude. And then you're not in the *magical* low-latency low-altitude zone that these companies actually want for fast comms.

                celeduc@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                celeduc@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                celeduc@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #22

                @sundogplanets they're building a summoning circle

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

                  Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

                  What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #23

                  Ok fine time to read the awful document.

                  First off, they imply they don't have to listen to any of the comments because nobody submitted "service copies, certificates of service, or affidavits" but I'm pretty sure that's just for formal petitions to deny. The American Astronomical Society did all of those things for SpaceX's million sat filing and Reflect Orbital, and it was expensive, hard, and it didn't make a fucking difference. So not doing that again.

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    This company also posted an ex parte filing (which means they had a super special extra FCC meeting), their satellites are too fucking huge to even be physically possible. They just can't fucking do this.

                    My estimate from looking at this ridiculous sketch is 8x60x10m solar panels... that's a reflecting area of 4800 m^2. The International Space Station, the biggest thing in orbit, has a solar panel area of about 3400 m^2.

                    jcarr@techhub.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jcarr@techhub.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jcarr@techhub.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #24

                    @sundogplanets The company is called "Cowboy Space" and they call their launch solution "Stampede"? I hate this timeline.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • scottmgs@justme.masto.hostS scottmgs@justme.masto.host

                      @NatureMC @sundogplanets 😏 So are people!

                      naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                      naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                      naturemc@mastodon.online
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #25

                      @ScottMGS Not the CEOs of certain companies and certain billionaires. Many of them are pathologic narcissists or act otherwise against social behaviour. If a wolf acted like this, the pack would exclude them.

                      @sundogplanets

                      scottmgs@justme.masto.hostS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Ok fine time to read the awful document.

                        First off, they imply they don't have to listen to any of the comments because nobody submitted "service copies, certificates of service, or affidavits" but I'm pretty sure that's just for formal petitions to deny. The American Astronomical Society did all of those things for SpaceX's million sat filing and Reflect Orbital, and it was expensive, hard, and it didn't make a fucking difference. So not doing that again.

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #26

                        Oh gosh I don't know if I can actually read this. "The United States is engaged in a race for AI dominance, and as the terrestrial electric grid is overwhelmed by the demands of new data centers this race is now a race for space dominance as well"

                        FUCK THIS OUTRIGHT COLONIALIST DOGSHIT. WOW.

                        "Very little in the record disputes Cowboy Space’s qualifications"

                        HAHAHA that's because you haven't fucking done ANYTHING!!!

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS virginicus@universeodon.comV 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Oh gosh I don't know if I can actually read this. "The United States is engaged in a race for AI dominance, and as the terrestrial electric grid is overwhelmed by the demands of new data centers this race is now a race for space dominance as well"

                          FUCK THIS OUTRIGHT COLONIALIST DOGSHIT. WOW.

                          "Very little in the record disputes Cowboy Space’s qualifications"

                          HAHAHA that's because you haven't fucking done ANYTHING!!!

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #27

                          "While one commenter derides Cowboy Space’s approach to data centers as mere 'avoidance' of terrestrial environmental regulation"

                          Uh yep that was me (via @space_environmentalism)

                          The rest of that section appears to be greenwashing, IN SPAAAACE!

                          faithisleaping@anarres.familyF sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS autolycos@beige.partyA mikemccaffrey@wandering.shopM 4 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

                            Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

                            What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

                            crinstamcamp@thecanadian.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            crinstamcamp@thecanadian.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            crinstamcamp@thecanadian.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #28

                            @sundogplanets bah, what's the worst that could happen...

                            https://youtube.com/shorts/4whaWQDHdcs

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              "While one commenter derides Cowboy Space’s approach to data centers as mere 'avoidance' of terrestrial environmental regulation"

                              Uh yep that was me (via @space_environmentalism)

                              The rest of that section appears to be greenwashing, IN SPAAAACE!

                              faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                              faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                              faithisleaping@anarres.family
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #29

                              @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                              Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                              But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                              palmandneedle@norden.socialP fullywoolly@mastodon.socialF eleanor@chaosfem.twE deedo@mastodon.nlD tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT 9 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                "While one commenter derides Cowboy Space’s approach to data centers as mere 'avoidance' of terrestrial environmental regulation"

                                Uh yep that was me (via @space_environmentalism)

                                The rest of that section appears to be greenwashing, IN SPAAAACE!

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #30

                                Next, they spend a bunch of time saying they totally need a bond waiver. Please ignore all the stuff we said about how much money we're making! We shouldn't have to pay!

                                And then they go into specifics of saying that @space_environmentalism "mischaracterized" the purpose of a bond: it's not actually to make companies pay for cleanup, it's to avoid over-asking for orbits. Well... they might have a point there, the FCC certainly doesn't give a shit about cleaning anything up.

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                  @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                                  Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                                  But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                                  palmandneedle@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  palmandneedle@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  palmandneedle@norden.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #31

                                  @faithisleaping @sundogplanets no physics, just vibes

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Next, they spend a bunch of time saying they totally need a bond waiver. Please ignore all the stuff we said about how much money we're making! We shouldn't have to pay!

                                    And then they go into specifics of saying that @space_environmentalism "mischaracterized" the purpose of a bond: it's not actually to make companies pay for cleanup, it's to avoid over-asking for orbits. Well... they might have a point there, the FCC certainly doesn't give a shit about cleaning anything up.

                                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #32

                                    They make it pretty clear that they are in fact over-asking and also don't intend to actually launch 20,000 satellites in 5 years. So... I guess that's good. But also fucking annoying.

                                    Oh no here's the astronomy section. I'm sure this will be great.

                                    rwaschbaer@punkstodon.deR sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN 3 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

                                      A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

                                      thorium@social.linux.pizzaT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      thorium@social.linux.pizzaT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      thorium@social.linux.pizza
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #33

                                      @sundogplanets Here's hoping that *ugh* Cowboy Space heads to their final roundup before they launch anything. I think funding is going to do in many of the companies, dragging their investors down with them.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        They make it pretty clear that they are in fact over-asking and also don't intend to actually launch 20,000 satellites in 5 years. So... I guess that's good. But also fucking annoying.

                                        Oh no here's the astronomy section. I'm sure this will be great.

                                        rwaschbaer@punkstodon.deR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rwaschbaer@punkstodon.deR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rwaschbaer@punkstodon.de
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #34

                                        @sundogplanets Just hope that there's not also an astrology section coming 😉

                                        timtfj@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                          @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                                          Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                                          But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                                          fullywoolly@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fullywoolly@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fullywoolly@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #35

                                          @faithisleaping @sundogplanets I brought the same thing up to some friends. They were like there are other ways to build in redundancy and besides the output isn't critical anyway.

                                          I'm like... Cool so we're just going to have transistors randomly turning on causing shoot through. What could go wrong.

                                          theothersimo@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper