This is a modern motherfucking website.

[owenfromcanada@mstdn.ca]

@lproven You've accurately portrayed the nature of my grievance. Thank you.

[idiot@shitposter.world]

@lproven >the grownups are talking
No they're not. I had to scroll back four pages on your profile to find the first post you've made with more than 1 reply, retweet, or like. The lion's share of your posts have next to no interaction, and you don't repost anyone else's content, so it's not like you're jumping up and down saying YES, THAT MAN COULDN'T HAVE SAID IT BETTER about anything either.
Anyways, if you're not gonna block me and give me the scalp, and you don't want to have a conversation about how four lossy jpegs in a video container trenchcoat is a shitty file, I don't know what else to tell you other than I hope you've enjoyed the most conversation you've had on fedi all year.

[8r3n7@mstdn.ca]

@lproven It is a phenomenon, that certain kinds of people must avoid the simple, and instead make things needlessly complicated and inefficient, in their need to feel powerful and special. Or something. The psychology is baffling.

[djm62@beige.party]

@lproven wonderful!

[2something@transfem.social]

@lproven@social.vivaldi.net

I will continue to shill https://geminiprotocol.net .

[fedipete@techhub.social]

@lproven fantastic read!

Proves how RFC's need more profanity to keep you awake!.

[nieuemma@mastodon.de]

@idiot @lproven name checks out

[nieuemma@mastodon.de]

@2something @lproven unfortunate name, since most people seem to know of Gemini as the google AI. Thus seema like it could be cool though

[2something@transfem.social]

@nieuemma@mastodon.de @lproven@social.vivaldi.net

Gemini protocol predates Google AI.

[severtz@mastodon.online]

@lproven Perfect would not store cookies on my machine.

Still very near, though!

[nieuemma@mastodon.de]

@2something @lproven its still unfortunate that they both carry that name, and that the wrong one is widely known.

[calibanscreations@app.wafrn.net]

@lproven@social.vivaldi.net

Good to know…

[su_liam@mas.to]

@lproven Yeah. I’m still good with this…

https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

[su_liam@mas.to]

@lproven It kinda pisses me off that Javadocs ditched frames in favor of whatever opaque crap they’re using now. Total retrograde slide!

[zvava@bbs.619.hu]

@lproven no it's not. the person who put margin: 0 auto; on body but neglected to set max-width and still somehow shipped this as "perfect" should be fucking ashamed

[photo55@mastodon.social]

@lproven outstanding.

[stellar@mk.absturztau.be]

@lproven@social.vivaldi.net how can you read this? there isn't any cookie banner!

[dolanor@hachyderm.io]

@lproven I'm sad it didn't mention the glorious backend for frontend pattern.

What about content negociation, inbreeding rot brain?

[dolanor@hachyderm.io]

@Flo_BWWI_grind @lproven true dat

[chaekyung@ieji.de]

@lproven @idiot Yeah... right. Uploading a .avif file to the Mastodon instance I'm using right now gives me "500 Error processing thumbnail for uploaded media".

Are you trying to say that all Mastodon sites are the "dogshit", or do you simply not realize how foolish and childish you are?

Uploading webp images here does work. If webp files are smaller or better or not is of course up to those who create them. Pic related becomes 68K as a 90% quality webp, 484K as a lossless webp, 184K as a jpeg saved with a 95% quality setting and 476K with a 100% quality setting.

A 90% quality webp is fine if you assume that nobody will ever do anything other than display the image in a web browser, but that's not always the case. I suspect that a lot of "news outlets" are serving .avif files compressed to death intentionally in order to discourage anyone from ever doing anything with their images. That's not a good thing.