Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. You know what else about AI?

You know what else about AI?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
29 Indlæg 21 Posters 116 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD davidhmccoy@mastodon.world

    @jilleduffy

    💯. It is insane how much they are pushing it at my job. This one manager asked a coworker to use AI to shorten 4 sentences into bullet points.

    Four.

    architektdiewelt@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    architektdiewelt@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    architektdiewelt@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #20

    @davidhmccoy @jilleduffy I know people who generate tickets in Jira using AI which results in terrible quality and no one knows what to do, however they still believe it’s valuable to do so and won’t stop.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • impudentstrumpet@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      impudentstrumpet@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      impudentstrumpet@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #21

      @bignose @jilleduffy I like this infant analogy!

      If you don't hang out with the infant doing everyday stuff and are only parachuted in when they're crying, you'll have no idea why they're crying!

      Whereas if you're there all the time, you can go straight to "Oh, that's their 'I need to be burped again' face". And can probably even automatically prevent the crying by recognizing the face before the crying starts

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

        You know what else about AI?

        People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

        We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

        If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

        bartfoss42@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bartfoss42@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bartfoss42@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #22

        @jilleduffy Agree, good post. People also tend to forget that the "mindless parts" are a great way to introduce juniors or new hires into a project or whatever.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

          You know what else about AI?

          People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

          We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

          If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

          kaleemullahkalyar@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kaleemullahkalyar@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kaleemullahkalyar@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #23

          @jilleduffy yeah I agree, there is also another challenge, big tech giants are well positioned to take complete leverage from modern tech upgrades like MCP and using it as a paid service and doing tasks like web automation on the contrary individuals are restricted by buzz words like this is spam, privacy violations etc. double standards

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

            You know what else about AI?

            People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

            We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

            If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

            K This user is from outside of this forum
            K This user is from outside of this forum
            karkariza@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #24

            @jilleduffy

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

              @davidhmccoy This is the thing. AI might be fine for looking at large data sets of medical images, for example, and finding commonalities among images that did or did not develop into cancer 5 years later. That is a great use case. There may be other great use cases in a very specific profession, such as software development. But that is not what AI "hype" is. The hype says "if you don't figure out how to use it in ALL of your jobs, you will be left behind."

              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
              marjolica@social.linux.pizza
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #25

              @jilleduffy @davidhmccoy this is not an example of generative AI (LLM), the subset of machine learning we all love to hate.
              The medical image application is based on identifying common factors where there is a yes/no discriminant: whether the imaged person went on to develop cancer or not.
              Generative AI is just fancy auto complete, it has no idea of truth and whatever it seems to claim when you prompt it is never tested for accuracy during training.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                @davidhmccoy This is the thing. AI might be fine for looking at large data sets of medical images, for example, and finding commonalities among images that did or did not develop into cancer 5 years later. That is a great use case. There may be other great use cases in a very specific profession, such as software development. But that is not what AI "hype" is. The hype says "if you don't figure out how to use it in ALL of your jobs, you will be left behind."

                sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                sabik@rants.au
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #26

                @jilleduffy @davidhmccoy
                AI can be great for medical images, but not the LLM kind of AI

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                  You know what else about AI?

                  People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                  We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                  If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                  rabiesgirl@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rabiesgirl@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rabiesgirl@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #27

                  @jilleduffy there is an ideal reality where automation is inversely proportional to the amount of work people are doing and wages go up to lower the average weekly working hours.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mu@mastodon.nzM mu@mastodon.nz

                    @hopeless @jilleduffy none of that other stuff has been resolved.

                    hopeless@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hopeless@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hopeless@mas.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #28

                    @mu @jilleduffy Right, the big sump of negative arguments can't be resolved, at least not quickly.

                    Some of it had a sell-by-date, like beliefs around AI not working or coding assists dumping training data.

                    Some of it is wrong, like coding assists "based on stealing" when most github stuff they trawled is MIT or other liberal license that's fine with it.

                    "Boiling the oceans" does not apply to selfhosted AI run on solar.

                    Some of it is like horse paste to an antivaxxer: evidence doesn't apply.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jilleduffy@mastodon.socialJ jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                      You know what else about AI?

                      People who hype it have no idea about diminishing returns

                      We have decades of research showing that when people only work on the hard stuff at work and don't get sufficient breaks, they burn out faster

                      If you're selling AI as a tool that "automates the mindless parts of work" then the worker is only left with the hard parts, and they burn out faster

                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      nicelymanifest@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #29

                      @jilleduffy As ever, the very notion of balanced, holistic, empathic thinking and understanding is anathema or invisible to manic AI domination seeking corps.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper