Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. MAGA wants the nation to stick its head into the sand about #ClimateChange.

MAGA wants the nation to stick its head into the sand about #ClimateChange.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
climatechange
43 Indlæg 1 Posters 80 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

    "The suppression of climate data by the US government has global implications. The international scientific community depends on the US for critical data which helps in responding to climate disasters.

    Disruptions to such data also risk deepening existing scientific and geopolitical inequalities. Limiting access to US climate datasets can especially impact the ability of vulnerable nations to address climate change effectively."

    https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/inside-trumps-campaign-to-censor-climate-science/

    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #19

    "Environmental advocates are suing the Trump administration over what they described as a secretive plan to undermine climate science.

    There is a scientific consensus that climate change is exacerbating extreme weather.

    In their suit, the groups alleged that the department and agency “have sought to manufacture a basis to reject” the scientific consensus on climate change."

    https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5449186-environmental-groups-sue-trump/

    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

      "Environmental advocates are suing the Trump administration over what they described as a secretive plan to undermine climate science.

      There is a scientific consensus that climate change is exacerbating extreme weather.

      In their suit, the groups alleged that the department and agency “have sought to manufacture a basis to reject” the scientific consensus on climate change."

      https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5449186-environmental-groups-sue-trump/

      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #20

      Fact check

      "A “critical assessment” report commissioned by the Trump administration to justify a rollback of US climate regulations contains at least 100 false or misleading statements, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists."

      https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/doe-factcheck/index.html

      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

        Fact check

        "A “critical assessment” report commissioned by the Trump administration to justify a rollback of US climate regulations contains at least 100 false or misleading statements, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists."

        https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/doe-factcheck/index.html

        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #21

        "The Energy Department and the EPA seem to have run afoul of four laws in particular that may be tricky for the administration to get around. "

        https://theconversation.com/4-laws-that-could-stymie-the-trump-epas-plan-to-rescind-the-endangerment-finding-central-to-us-climate-policies-262952

        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

          "The Energy Department and the EPA seem to have run afoul of four laws in particular that may be tricky for the administration to get around. "

          https://theconversation.com/4-laws-that-could-stymie-the-trump-epas-plan-to-rescind-the-endangerment-finding-central-to-us-climate-policies-262952

          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #22

          "A group of the US’s leading climate scientists have compiled a withering review of a controversial Trump administration report that downplays the risks of the climate crisis, finding that the document is biased, riddled with errors and fails basic scientific credibility.""

          https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-administration-climate-report

          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

            "A group of the US’s leading climate scientists have compiled a withering review of a controversial Trump administration report that downplays the risks of the climate crisis, finding that the document is biased, riddled with errors and fails basic scientific credibility.""

            https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-administration-climate-report

            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #23

            "For instance, the five skeptics contended that “meteorological drought” was not increasing in the United States; as the researchers point out in their response, this is cherry-picked nonsense.

            The comment has sections like this on every topic raised by the D.O.E. report.

            It’s a blitzkrieg of studies, observations, and data which makes clear that the authors [of the DOE report] were miles out of their depth, and further still out of the mainstream."

            https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/trumps-department-of-energy-gets-scienced

            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

              "For instance, the five skeptics contended that “meteorological drought” was not increasing in the United States; as the researchers point out in their response, this is cherry-picked nonsense.

              The comment has sections like this on every topic raised by the D.O.E. report.

              It’s a blitzkrieg of studies, observations, and data which makes clear that the authors [of the DOE report] were miles out of their depth, and further still out of the mainstream."

              https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/trumps-department-of-energy-gets-scienced

              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #24

              Climate denial working group disbanded.

              "The group’s end can be traced to a lawsuit filed by the Environmental Defense Fund and Union of Concerned Scientists.

              Though the group has been disbanded, DOE will not withdraw the report it authored, which sparked resistance across the climate science community and stirred a coordinated response during the required public-comment period."

              https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/10/climate/trump-dissolves-contrarian-group

              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                Climate denial working group disbanded.

                "The group’s end can be traced to a lawsuit filed by the Environmental Defense Fund and Union of Concerned Scientists.

                Though the group has been disbanded, DOE will not withdraw the report it authored, which sparked resistance across the climate science community and stirred a coordinated response during the required public-comment period."

                https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/10/climate/trump-dissolves-contrarian-group

                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #25

                "The report stands in opposition to the Trump administration's decision in July to begin the process of revoking a key scientific finding published by the EPA in 2009 that six greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and must be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

                But the National Academies concluded that the 2009 [endangerment] finding was accurate and is bolstered by stronger evidence that has since been supported by additional scientific research."

                https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-academies-rebukes-epa-climate-threats/

                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                  "The report stands in opposition to the Trump administration's decision in July to begin the process of revoking a key scientific finding published by the EPA in 2009 that six greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and must be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

                  But the National Academies concluded that the 2009 [endangerment] finding was accurate and is bolstered by stronger evidence that has since been supported by additional scientific research."

                  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-academies-rebukes-epa-climate-threats/

                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #26

                  "U.S. District Judge William Young in Boston [finds] that the work undertaken by the group convened by Energy Secretary Chris Wright fell outside the strict mandates of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                  The judge said he would discuss next steps in the case at a September 23 hearing.

                  https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-climate-panel-not-exempt-transparency-requirements-judge-rules-2025-09-17/

                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                    "U.S. District Judge William Young in Boston [finds] that the work undertaken by the group convened by Energy Secretary Chris Wright fell outside the strict mandates of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                    The judge said he would discuss next steps in the case at a September 23 hearing.

                    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-climate-panel-not-exempt-transparency-requirements-judge-rules-2025-09-17/

                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #27

                    “The endangerment finding is the foundation for regulation of greenhouse gases at the federal level,” Field said. “It is not the government’s only tool for tackling climate change, but it is key to a balanced program with both carrots and sticks.”

                    Here are five things to know about the endangerment finding.

                    https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/09/endangerment-finding-epa-science-facts

                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                      “The endangerment finding is the foundation for regulation of greenhouse gases at the federal level,” Field said. “It is not the government’s only tool for tackling climate change, but it is key to a balanced program with both carrots and sticks.”

                      Here are five things to know about the endangerment finding.

                      https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/09/endangerment-finding-epa-science-facts

                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #28

                      There is still time to add public comment:

                      "Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to the docket for this rule through September 22, 2025. There are several ways to provide written comments on the proposal, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194:"

                      https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule-reconsideration-2009-endangerment-finding#extension%20

                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                        There is still time to add public comment:

                        "Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to the docket for this rule through September 22, 2025. There are several ways to provide written comments on the proposal, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194:"

                        https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule-reconsideration-2009-endangerment-finding#extension%20

                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #29

                        "The NAS report does not mess around with subtleties, going straight to the main point: Everything we've learned since the endangerment finding confirms that it was on target. "EPA’s 2009 finding that the human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases threaten human health and welfare was accurate, has stood the test of time, and is now reinforced by even stronger evidence," its authors conclude."

                        https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/09/despite-congressional-threat-national-academies-releases-new-climate-report/

                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                          "The NAS report does not mess around with subtleties, going straight to the main point: Everything we've learned since the endangerment finding confirms that it was on target. "EPA’s 2009 finding that the human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases threaten human health and welfare was accurate, has stood the test of time, and is now reinforced by even stronger evidence," its authors conclude."

                          https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/09/despite-congressional-threat-national-academies-releases-new-climate-report/

                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #30

                          "A coalition of states, cities, and counties is taking on the U.S. EPA over its attempt to rescind key climate change protections, warning that the move would endanger public health and violate federal law.

                          The legal filings are backed by more than 20 state attorneys general, along with major cities like New York, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Officials say the EPA must reverse course and recommit to protecting Americans from climate-driven harms."

                          https://www.fingerlakes1.com/2025/09/22/states-push-back-on-epa-move-to-gut-climate-protections/

                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                            "A coalition of states, cities, and counties is taking on the U.S. EPA over its attempt to rescind key climate change protections, warning that the move would endanger public health and violate federal law.

                            The legal filings are backed by more than 20 state attorneys general, along with major cities like New York, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Officials say the EPA must reverse course and recommit to protecting Americans from climate-driven harms."

                            https://www.fingerlakes1.com/2025/09/22/states-push-back-on-epa-move-to-gut-climate-protections/

                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #31

                            A Secret Panel to Question Climate Science Was Unlawful, Judge Rules

                            https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/climate/energy-department-climate-ruling.html

                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                              A Secret Panel to Question Climate Science Was Unlawful, Judge Rules

                              https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/climate/energy-department-climate-ruling.html

                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #32

                              "While many industry groups backed the repeal of vehicle emission standards, many were reluctant to show public support for rescinding the endangerment finding because of the legal and regulatory uncertainty it would unleash.

                              Last month, the American Petroleum Institute said it supported a repeal of the endangerment finding for vehicles but said it should be left in place for stationary sources"

                              https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-repeal-landmark-climate-finding-huge-regulatory-rollback-wsj-reports-2026-02-10/

                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                "While many industry groups backed the repeal of vehicle emission standards, many were reluctant to show public support for rescinding the endangerment finding because of the legal and regulatory uncertainty it would unleash.

                                Last month, the American Petroleum Institute said it supported a repeal of the endangerment finding for vehicles but said it should be left in place for stationary sources"

                                https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-repeal-landmark-climate-finding-huge-regulatory-rollback-wsj-reports-2026-02-10/

                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #33

                                EPA to repeal its own conclusion that greenhouse gases warm the planet and threaten health

                                "Known as the endangerment finding, the decision is the legal framework that allows the EPA to regulate emissions. Its reversal could upend many climate change policies."

                                https://www.nbcnews.com/science/climate-change/epa-to-repeal-endangerment-finding-climate-change-emissions-rcna258250

                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                  EPA to repeal its own conclusion that greenhouse gases warm the planet and threaten health

                                  "Known as the endangerment finding, the decision is the legal framework that allows the EPA to regulate emissions. Its reversal could upend many climate change policies."

                                  https://www.nbcnews.com/science/climate-change/epa-to-repeal-endangerment-finding-climate-change-emissions-rcna258250

                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #34

                                  As a friend remarked:

                                  "The long-term background scheming over many years is operatic in scope.

                                  And the crazy details, like Mandy Gunasekara being the same woman who handed Sen James Inhofe that snowball all those years ago, make this a rich read."

                                  Same friend gave a gift link, no registration required:

                                  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/09/climate/endangerment-finding.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LFA.iuVx.cD2Z1h9NijP4

                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                    As a friend remarked:

                                    "The long-term background scheming over many years is operatic in scope.

                                    And the crazy details, like Mandy Gunasekara being the same woman who handed Sen James Inhofe that snowball all those years ago, make this a rich read."

                                    Same friend gave a gift link, no registration required:

                                    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/09/climate/endangerment-finding.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LFA.iuVx.cD2Z1h9NijP4

                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #35

                                    " “The proposal pretty much threw spaghetti on the wall,” says Rachel Cleetus, UCS. “There's just all kinds of arguments, all of them without merit”

                                    “I will eat my car if they get upheld on the science,” says Parenteau.

                                    It’s guaranteed that several environmental groups will immediately launch a challenge to the EPA’s new rule. Legal experts tell WIRED that it’s also clear that the EPA is seeking to take this struggle directly to the Supreme Court."

                                    https://www.wired.com/story/the-fight-over-us-climate-rules-is-just-beginning/

                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                      " “The proposal pretty much threw spaghetti on the wall,” says Rachel Cleetus, UCS. “There's just all kinds of arguments, all of them without merit”

                                      “I will eat my car if they get upheld on the science,” says Parenteau.

                                      It’s guaranteed that several environmental groups will immediately launch a challenge to the EPA’s new rule. Legal experts tell WIRED that it’s also clear that the EPA is seeking to take this struggle directly to the Supreme Court."

                                      https://www.wired.com/story/the-fight-over-us-climate-rules-is-just-beginning/

                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #36

                                      "The administration is misleadingly claiming that climate regulations increase the cost of cars and trucks. In fact, as Dana Nuccitelli reported last fall, “This argument neglects the cost savings from reduced vehicle fueling bills and lessened climate damage. The Biden EPA estimated that its 2023 vehicle tailpipe rules would have generated about $1 trillion in net benefits over the next three decades.” "

                                      https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2026/02/trump-just-torched-federal-climate-regulations-heres-what-it-means/

                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                        "The administration is misleadingly claiming that climate regulations increase the cost of cars and trucks. In fact, as Dana Nuccitelli reported last fall, “This argument neglects the cost savings from reduced vehicle fueling bills and lessened climate damage. The Biden EPA estimated that its 2023 vehicle tailpipe rules would have generated about $1 trillion in net benefits over the next three decades.” "

                                        https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2026/02/trump-just-torched-federal-climate-regulations-heres-what-it-means/

                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #37

                                        The headline not seen inside the United States:

                                        Trump drops key US climate rule, swaps health for cheap cars

                                        https://www.dw.com/en/trump-drops-key-us-climate-rule-swaps-health-for-cheap-cars/a-75939736

                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                          The headline not seen inside the United States:

                                          Trump drops key US climate rule, swaps health for cheap cars

                                          https://www.dw.com/en/trump-drops-key-us-climate-rule-swaps-health-for-cheap-cars/a-75939736

                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #38

                                          "By the numbers: The firm projects that without big EPA rules underpinned by the finding, U.S. emissions in 2035 would be 26-35% below 2005 levels.

                                          If the rules were intact? A steeper decline of 32-44%.

                                          Reality check: Neither path comes close to what scientists say is needed to avoid the worst climate impacts."

                                          https://www.axios.com/2026/02/12/trump-epa-climate-rollback-emissions-impact

                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper