We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
-
@Nike_Leonhard @EUCommission oh get over yourself already.
@grouchox@freeradical.zonenoch noch mal auf deutsch bitte. Auf englisch bringe ich keinen Sinn in deine Worte. @EUCommission
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission "spicy mode" ?? FFS it's a serious issue.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission "This is disgusting" indeed but you really think only Grok/X does this? Open your eyes about AI. CSAM generation is mild compared to its poisonous power. Using it to spy every citizen is way worse: stop this #chatcontrol nonsense now.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission I'm sorry but this is genuinely upsetting.
The way this is worded is really not the way serious crimes should be talked about.
The AI wasn't violating copyright or making silly edits. It was making CSAM.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission
What about your support of the #chat-control to use #mass-surveillance on all #citizens to "protect" "children" from #abuse and #casm? You don't have a leg to stand on with "being aware" but not doing anything about it.
While you are ad it, safe the #GDPR from beeing gutted by your #omnibusImagine a future where people look back and say "wow, the EU stood against fascism and succeeded with their policies" just imagine how nice that would be.
Have a wonderful weekend! -
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
would you join the dots?
-
now, @EUCommission, why?
@angiebaby @EUCommission
Ok, we got it, we are going to create f**king X accounts, and ask the same question. Maybe we'll get more luck there. -
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission You could at least restrict visibility of grok's posts in the EU, you know, like you restrict visibility of some anti-genocide posts.
-
@angiebaby @EUCommission
Ok, we got it, we are going to create f**king X accounts, and ask the same question. Maybe we'll get more luck there.Have Grok undress some of the male Commission members.
-
Have Grok undress some of the male Commission members.
@angiebaby @EUCommission Ha ha, maybe this way they will reconsider their social media options.
-
@EUCommission In the face or recent #chatcontrol stuff ( with similar reasoning ) I feel slight tingling of unease. I don't like AI, I don't like X ( or any other proprietary platform ) and I don't like abuse. But the way this argument was put together feels a bit odd.
@blenderdumbass @EUCommission #chatControl was never about the children. It was always about control. At least they are publicly showing it to everyone to whom it hasn't been bloody obvious from the beginning.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
