According to The Epstein Transparency Act, the Department of Justice can ONLY redact names and faces of victims or withhold child sexual abuse material.
-
According to The Epstein Transparency Act, the Department of Justice can ONLY redact names and faces of victims or withhold child sexual abuse material.
And so they released more files. But what they overlooked is, some of the documents have already been released, and by comparison we can now see how they have redacted the files:
Picture 1: Document previously released in 2024.
Picture 2: The same document, but now with Trump's name redacted, as released recently by the DoJ.
THIS IS ILLEGAL.
-
According to The Epstein Transparency Act, the Department of Justice can ONLY redact names and faces of victims or withhold child sexual abuse material.
And so they released more files. But what they overlooked is, some of the documents have already been released, and by comparison we can now see how they have redacted the files:
Picture 1: Document previously released in 2024.
Picture 2: The same document, but now with Trump's name redacted, as released recently by the DoJ.
THIS IS ILLEGAL.
Sources:
The first unredacted version released in 2024:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdfThe new Pam Bondi DoJ version where Trump's name is redacted:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1296-17.pdf -
Sources:
The first unredacted version released in 2024:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdfThe new Pam Bondi DoJ version where Trump's name is redacted:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1296-17.pdf@randahl Wow.
They’re so evil, and they’re so fucking incompetent. I guess yay on the latter.
-
T tanyakaroli@expressional.social shared this topic
-
@randahl Wow.
They’re so evil, and they’re so fucking incompetent. I guess yay on the latter.
@Remittancegirl
But are they going to get away with this, too? I greatly fear the US is indeed already THAT lawless.
@randahl -
@Remittancegirl
But are they going to get away with this, too? I greatly fear the US is indeed already THAT lawless.
@randahl@Eetschrijver I fear you are right. @randahl
-
S suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
-
@Eetschrijver I fear you are right. @randahl
@Remittancegirl @Eetschrijver @randahl
I have been known to be wrong before, but I am fairly certain this is not what getting away with it looks like.
GOP rep. Thomas Massie and a democratic co-sponsor seem to have already introduced articles of impeachment against Bondi.
-
@Remittancegirl @Eetschrijver @randahl
I have been known to be wrong before, but I am fairly certain this is not what getting away with it looks like.
GOP rep. Thomas Massie and a democratic co-sponsor seem to have already introduced articles of impeachment against Bondi.
@SuneAuken @Remittancegirl @Eetschrijver @randahl it would take years
-
@SuneAuken @Remittancegirl @Eetschrijver @randahl it would take years
@f4grx @Remittancegirl @Eetschrijver @randahl
Goodbye despair troll. #ShrugAndBlock
