A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.
-
@Tarbh @venya I'm sorry but half the boxes on the org chart are labelled [CLASSIFIED]. And the org chart itself is [CLASSIFIED] above your level.
Srsly, I've heard anecdotes about folks tasked with writing reports that were then classified so high they weren't allowed to read them—or then to amend them where found to be factually incorrect.
@cstross @Tarbh @venya This happens in smaller bureaucracies too. My former employer had a specific problem, and an exec believed the solution to that problem was the specific subdiscipline of cryptography I was working in at the time (I’m a builder, not a cryptographer, but I was building systems to manage cryptographic assets and processes, which has some specific duties of care), so I was asked to look at the problem
Since the problem touched many areas and teams that would need to contribute or participate, I set out to codify the problem in careful prose, and to write a detailed threat model. The time eventually came to review with a senior principal engineer, and on first read through, he said “I think this needs to be privileged and confidential”
So now, this work that was for a wide audience was no longer accessible by that audience
At least the execs were aware that my area was not the quick and easy solution to the problem they’d assumed it was
-
@cstross I know where AO3 is, of course, but I'd like to read "the Slow Horses stumble into a Laundry op"
-
PS: I'm not making this up. More about the US Intelligence Community here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community
"The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole would include 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances."
@cstross our country has more spies than it has pilots?
-
Once upon a time I was in the middle east responsible for all of a specific type of activity conducted by the combined joint special operations task force. In the 9th month of our deployment, preparing to head home, I was still learning of the EXISTENCE of teams below me doing that activity; I'd no notion of WHAT they were doing, except that I knew beyond doubt that it wasn't being done right because it would've had to come through me.
Whole system is broke.
or the whole system is "people"
we've been making shit overly complicated since the day we first invented shitting.
i mean instead of developing a single government we invited thousands of variations. none of which report to eachother and most of which fight.
and that statement works at the world level AND the city level for most cities.
we are like ants running on fungal software and working to cross purposes
-
@Tarbh @venya @cstross The first purpose of the office is to develop and maintain that chart, but it's never complete because groups are always being stood up or disbanded, or someone decides something needs to happen and doesn't know to reach out because no-one told them about the new office or what its responsibility was (or they *did* know about the office but had a cultural history of begging forgiveness being a better way to get the job done than asking for permission).
I worked in a medium sized organization, and for a while I had *the* role that should have been responsible for knowing who was doing what relevant work in my area of responsibility. I was not able to develop said list.
-
From Frank Herbert's novels:
"The protagonist of "The Tactful Saboteur" is saboteur extraordinary Jorj X. McKie, an employee of the Bureau of Sabotage (BuSab). BuSab is a government agency responsible for conducting dirty tricks "in lieu of red tape" to help slow down and regulate the vast galaxy-spanning bureaucracy of the ConSentiency"
-
Now, I'm currently grappling with a space opera set in a mid-sized interstellar empire governed by backbiting aristocrats/planetary despots, with 8000 star systems, multiple settled worlds/habitats per system, and travel times measured in weeks to months. Multiple governments per planet aren't unusual.
How many intel/secret police forces do you think *that* setting requires? Just saying "it's an empire, duh!" elides all the complexity a glance at the history of John Company would reveal.
I will say, one thing that the recent political evolutions have brought home which, in principle, doesn't surrpise me, but in practice just breaks my brain, is how freaking complex getting •anything• done in this world is. At every scale.
(My community is trying to get some additonal kit to deal with the recent drought conditions, & you'd think we were negotiating the UN charter
) -
Now, I'm currently grappling with a space opera set in a mid-sized interstellar empire governed by backbiting aristocrats/planetary despots, with 8000 star systems, multiple settled worlds/habitats per system, and travel times measured in weeks to months. Multiple governments per planet aren't unusual.
How many intel/secret police forces do you think *that* setting requires? Just saying "it's an empire, duh!" elides all the complexity a glance at the history of John Company would reveal.
@cstross
One of the great little details in Iain M. Banks algebraist, the protagonist is drafted into an intelligence agency/research org that he only vaguely remembers exists -
PS: I'm not making this up. More about the US Intelligence Community here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community
"The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole would include 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances."
@cstross nearly 1 million spooks
-
PS: I'm not making this up. More about the US Intelligence Community here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community
"The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole would include 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances."
@cstross
Headed by the Director of National Intelligence, a position with a rather high turnover rate. Trump’s previous one was Russian shill Tulsi Gabbard.edit to add: At least the turnover rate isn’t due to them accidentally falling out windows.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_National_Intelligence#Lists_of_personnel
-
RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117110021420097079
A point most authors studiously ignore is that the real world is *complex*.
Take spy thrillers. An American one might feature the CIA or, in extremis, the NSA. Up against one rival agency.
But in reality, there's a civil service clearinghouse called the United States Intelligence Community that has nineteen stakeholder members, each of which is an intel agency. Its job is to keep them from stomping on each other's toes.
Now ask yourself if any other nation's bureaucracy is plausibly simpler.
@cstross Schools should really teach complex systems and critical thinking understanding/skills.
Candidate politicians should be tested on both subjects.
Just imagine ...
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
