Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
140 Indlæg 67 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

    I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

    Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

    rianq@mastodon.pnpde.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    rianq@mastodon.pnpde.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    rianq@mastodon.pnpde.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #129

    @johnzajac Prevention is unsexy. That's it. It makes no headlines, it blows no minds, it sparks no joy, it generates no dopamine - it simply does its job effectually and without fanfare. And yet it is by far, far, far the best tool to avoid unwanted outcomes that we have.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

      I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

      Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

      pterry@fnordon.deP This user is from outside of this forum
      pterry@fnordon.deP This user is from outside of this forum
      pterry@fnordon.de
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #130

      @johnzajac prevention paradox strikes again! (I'm working in public health and the whole of it is basically prevention)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

        I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

        Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

        davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidhmccoy@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidhmccoy@mastodon.world
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #131

        @johnzajac

        💯. We worked like animals to fix the code.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • glent@aus.socialG glent@aus.social

          @johnzajac worthwhile pointing out that many websites displayed an impossible time due to a Y2K issue in Perl. The world did not stop.

          Also, the consulting companies made out like bandits. They used the concept of Y2K compliance to drive business.

          Because of that I am always cautious about Y2K as an analogy.

          dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dahukanna@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #132

          @glent @johnzajac the current Perl error comment is a classic example of survivorship bias - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
          That’s the bullethole that did not disable the plane(or world wide computer network)

          Y2K impact would have been the equivalent of every Amazon, Microsoft, Apple and Oracle datacenter shutting off at the same instant in time and going offline.
          ATMs, Supermarket Point of sales, planes, power stations, etc. all going offline too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

            I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

            Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

            mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
            mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
            mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #133

            @johnzajac the most recent Y2K failure i saw was only a few years ago, when a liquor store sign told me i couldn't buy alcohol unless i was born after this day in 1900.

            i've been telling non-tech people about fixing a lot of Y2K38 stuff lately, including the "this is why Y2K wasn't a problem - we fixed it" part. there were so many basic issues including "system won't boot" that would have awful to deal with. also, IMO, Y2K38 is a harder problem... i plan to skip Y2106 issues.

            jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

              I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

              Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

              ciredutempsesme@mamot.frC This user is from outside of this forum
              ciredutempsesme@mamot.frC This user is from outside of this forum
              ciredutempsesme@mamot.fr
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #134

              @johnzajac vaccines

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tomjennings@tldr.nettime.orgT tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org

                @johnzajac

                Why should my taxes pay for a "fire department"? My house isn't on fire!

                adredish@neuromatch.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                adredish@neuromatch.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                adredish@neuromatch.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #135

                @tomjennings @johnzajac

                [since I can't quote-boost it]
                "Why should my taxes pay for a "fire department"? My house isn't on fire!"

                The real problem is that they then demand that the fire get put out at cost without understanding that the cost is cheaper when you do prevention.

                https://rightnauconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/pay-for-spray-fire-protection-policy-a-case-study-of-obion-county-tennessee.pdf

                This is one of the reasons that US health care is so expensive. People use emergency rooms for basic health care, which they only go to when things get so bad they have to. Because health care premiums and copays and deductables are so high.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

                  I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

                  Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

                  wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wronglang@bayes.club
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #136

                  @johnzajac there's a handful of these kinds of things, getting the ozone layer to recover was another one. Underappreciated efforts spread out globally and backed by massive amounts of paperwork that actually did a thing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

                    I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

                    Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

                    snaefell@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    snaefell@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    snaefell@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #137

                    @johnzajac As always: There is no glory in prevention.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.orgM mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.org

                      @johnzajac the most recent Y2K failure i saw was only a few years ago, when a liquor store sign told me i couldn't buy alcohol unless i was born after this day in 1900.

                      i've been telling non-tech people about fixing a lot of Y2K38 stuff lately, including the "this is why Y2K wasn't a problem - we fixed it" part. there were so many basic issues including "system won't boot" that would have awful to deal with. also, IMO, Y2K38 is a harder problem... i plan to skip Y2106 issues.

                      jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jeffgrigg@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #138

                      @mrgtwentythree @johnzajac

                      Well, the liquor store sign is not *wrong*. No one born in 1900, or before can buy alcohol today. It's a moot point, as they're all dead.

                      (And I'm assuming that the sign actually said "on or before," not "after.")

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.orgM mrgtwentythree@mastodon.sdf.org

                        @johnzajac the most recent Y2K failure i saw was only a few years ago, when a liquor store sign told me i couldn't buy alcohol unless i was born after this day in 1900.

                        i've been telling non-tech people about fixing a lot of Y2K38 stuff lately, including the "this is why Y2K wasn't a problem - we fixed it" part. there were so many basic issues including "system won't boot" that would have awful to deal with. also, IMO, Y2K38 is a harder problem... i plan to skip Y2106 issues.

                        jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jeffgrigg@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jeffgrigg@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #139

                        @mrgtwentythree @johnzajac

                        I'm working on the Y10K problem. I'm a real forward-thinker. 😆

                        And, actually, in reality, I'm having a remarkably hard time convincing my superiors that there are really problems with a bunch of files we have, ... in spite of the fact that one of them even has a five digit year in it. Parsing error and the file can't be used, of course. So it *is* a real-world example of the Y10K bug. (And a typo, as that field can only have past dates, and 22025 is in the future)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

                          I wish we had spent the last 26 years teaching people that the reason the 2000 bug didn't destroy a significant amount of our infrastructure is because *we caught it* and *spent thousands of hours fixing it* BEFORE the year 2000

                          Because within that little perplexion - people thinking the problem was a hoax because it was fixed before it destroyed shit - is an encapsulation of the current era of Western politics, including COVID mitigation, lesser evil politics, fascism, and crime rate hyperbole

                          rrwo@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rrwo@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rrwo@infosec.exchange
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #140

                          @johnzajac

                          It's very hard to get people to care about infrastructure, because it's boring.

                          Future problems are even more boring.

                          I do find the concept of "technical debt" (as flawed as it is) is useful to get people thinking about infrastructure.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper