Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. It is becoming increasingly clear to me that one thing Canada *desperately* needs is domestic payment processing capability that's independent of the US, which means no Mastercard, no VISA, no AmEx, no PayPal.

It is becoming increasingly clear to me that one thing Canada *desperately* needs is domestic payment processing capability that's independent of the US, which means no Mastercard, no VISA, no AmEx, no PayPal.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
37 Indlæg 16 Posters 70 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

    @kevinrns @alan

    A no fee and not involving banks is the gold standard but right now I think separating our financial systems from the US should be the top priority

    kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kevinrns@mstdn.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #20

    @RantingCanuck @alan

    I'm hoping on joining the EU, and getting the Euro, and ending the dollar and No Longer paying banks, in the short term.👈

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

      @kevinrns @alan

      All Canada needs to do is put in legislation to ensure that Interac remains Canadian; require that it's infrastructure and governance are 100% Canadian, as well as prohibiting any transaction data from being exported. Then allow Canadian financial institutions to issue credit products that utilise the Interac network (they sort of already do as anyone with over draft protection and in many cases lines of credit can utilise those with Interac)

      alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      alan@mindly.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #21

      @RantingCanuck @kevinrns And again, if I want to use that instrument to book a hotel in France, what happens? If someone in Europe wants to book a hotel in Canada, what happens?

      rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR kevinrns@mstdn.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

        @RantingCanuck @kevinrns And again, if I want to use that instrument to book a hotel in France, what happens? If someone in Europe wants to book a hotel in Canada, what happens?

        rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
        rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
        rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #22

        @alan @kevinrns

        Any international payment system that is under the jurisdiction of one nation (or bloc) is always going to represent a risk for Canada to rely on. The best option is to maintain our own domestic national system with international agreements to allow for wider usage. This would mean we could only ever be cut off from a single entity, and even then only by our own choice or by the choice of that entity, without a 3rd party playing any role.

        kevinrns@mstdn.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

          @alan @kevinrns

          Any international payment system that is under the jurisdiction of one nation (or bloc) is always going to represent a risk for Canada to rely on. The best option is to maintain our own domestic national system with international agreements to allow for wider usage. This would mean we could only ever be cut off from a single entity, and even then only by our own choice or by the choice of that entity, without a 3rd party playing any role.

          kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kevinrns@mstdn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #23

          @RantingCanuck @alan

          Not if we are EU members, then it is ours.

          Sorry if you relied on bank fees.

          rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

            @RantingCanuck @kevinrns And again, if I want to use that instrument to book a hotel in France, what happens? If someone in Europe wants to book a hotel in Canada, what happens?

            kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kevinrns@mstdn.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #24

            @alan @RantingCanuck

            Just what happens when any member uses it. Canada should join the EU.

            Let's sort this out.

            alan@mindly.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kevinrns@mstdn.socialK kevinrns@mstdn.social

              @RantingCanuck @alan

              Not if we are EU members, then it is ours.

              Sorry if you relied on bank fees.

              rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
              rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
              rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #25

              @kevinrns @alan

              Even if Canada started negotiations with the EU on joining tomorrow it would still require agreement on all 33 accession chapters plus the agreement of all 27 existing EU members and a referendum in Canada because constitutional amendments would be required.

              That process would take years, realistically probably closer to a decade, and we as a nation simply cannot wait that long to separate ourselves from the US. Thus in the meantime we need to continue proceeding as a singular entity.

              kevinrns@mstdn.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

                @kevinrns @alan

                Even if Canada started negotiations with the EU on joining tomorrow it would still require agreement on all 33 accession chapters plus the agreement of all 27 existing EU members and a referendum in Canada because constitutional amendments would be required.

                That process would take years, realistically probably closer to a decade, and we as a nation simply cannot wait that long to separate ourselves from the US. Thus in the meantime we need to continue proceeding as a singular entity.

                kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kevinrns@mstdn.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #26

                @RantingCanuck @alan

                Yes, that's correct. ASAP is not next week. And yes joining is the goal.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

                  It is becoming increasingly clear to me that one thing Canada *desperately* needs is domestic payment processing capability that's independent of the US, which means no Mastercard, no VISA, no AmEx, no PayPal.

                  If the US decides to limit those platforms, our ability to do business with the rest of the world is severely curtailed.

                  Not only should the sale of Moneris be blocked, the infrastructure it depends on needs to be replaced... unless the plan is to use the revenue from the sale to build a solution that works with the rest of the world.

                  askpippa@c.imA This user is from outside of this forum
                  askpippa@c.imA This user is from outside of this forum
                  askpippa@c.im
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #27

                  @alan I’ve already written my bank, one involved in the sale, that I’ll move my investments elsewhere if the sale goes through. And wrote to my MP. Lots of Canadians should do the same and write.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rantingcanuck@mstdn.caR rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca

                    @kevinrns @alan

                    All Canada needs to do is put in legislation to ensure that Interac remains Canadian; require that it's infrastructure and governance are 100% Canadian, as well as prohibiting any transaction data from being exported. Then allow Canadian financial institutions to issue credit products that utilise the Interac network (they sort of already do as anyone with over draft protection and in many cases lines of credit can utilise those with Interac)

                    kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kevinrns@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #28

                    @RantingCanuck @alan

                    Sure, until the Euro.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

                      It is becoming increasingly clear to me that one thing Canada *desperately* needs is domestic payment processing capability that's independent of the US, which means no Mastercard, no VISA, no AmEx, no PayPal.

                      If the US decides to limit those platforms, our ability to do business with the rest of the world is severely curtailed.

                      Not only should the sale of Moneris be blocked, the infrastructure it depends on needs to be replaced... unless the plan is to use the revenue from the sale to build a solution that works with the rest of the world.

                      oyu_fka@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      oyu_fka@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      oyu_fka@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #29

                      @alan That's a very good point...I hope your government have realised and are taking suitable actions to outwit trump's mafia🤞!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kevinrns@mstdn.socialK kevinrns@mstdn.social

                        @alan @RantingCanuck

                        Just what happens when any member uses it. Canada should join the EU.

                        Let's sort this out.

                        alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alan@mindly.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #30

                        @kevinrns @RantingCanuck And then what happens when Marie LePen is in power in France and the AfD wins in Germany? I'm all for joining the EU, but there are some things that should be under domestic control. Alliances can change, as we've so clearly seen.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

                          It is becoming increasingly clear to me that one thing Canada *desperately* needs is domestic payment processing capability that's independent of the US, which means no Mastercard, no VISA, no AmEx, no PayPal.

                          If the US decides to limit those platforms, our ability to do business with the rest of the world is severely curtailed.

                          Not only should the sale of Moneris be blocked, the infrastructure it depends on needs to be replaced... unless the plan is to use the revenue from the sale to build a solution that works with the rest of the world.

                          geofcox@climatejustice.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          geofcox@climatejustice.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          geofcox@climatejustice.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #31

                          @alan

                          Given its historic links with France, perhaps one solution would be for Canadian banks to join the French Cartes Bancaires network, which processes card transactions in France - and most CB cards are co-branded with the Visa and Mastercard anyway.

                          CB operates as a cooperative owned by its member banks. Unlike Visa or Mastercard, CB is a non-profit, so its focus is on serving the French financial system and its users, rather than maximising shareholder profits.

                          Note there are EU payments processing systems in development, including the digital euro - but Canadian banks joining the Cartes Bancaires co-op would provide a quicker and easier exit from US payments processing.

                          alan@mindly.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • geofcox@climatejustice.socialG geofcox@climatejustice.social

                            @alan

                            Given its historic links with France, perhaps one solution would be for Canadian banks to join the French Cartes Bancaires network, which processes card transactions in France - and most CB cards are co-branded with the Visa and Mastercard anyway.

                            CB operates as a cooperative owned by its member banks. Unlike Visa or Mastercard, CB is a non-profit, so its focus is on serving the French financial system and its users, rather than maximising shareholder profits.

                            Note there are EU payments processing systems in development, including the digital euro - but Canadian banks joining the Cartes Bancaires co-op would provide a quicker and easier exit from US payments processing.

                            alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alan@mindly.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #32

                            @GeofCox If they're co-branded then they're subject to the whims of the idiot in chief. He can issue an Executive Order instructing VISA/MC to de-certifiy parts of their network, which they can do with the flip of a few bits. Even if the networks sue, it would take months if not years to resolve. Meanwhile the transactions fail. It's a widespread vulnerability and the "middle powers" should be working at full speed to eliminate it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

                              It is becoming increasingly clear to me that one thing Canada *desperately* needs is domestic payment processing capability that's independent of the US, which means no Mastercard, no VISA, no AmEx, no PayPal.

                              If the US decides to limit those platforms, our ability to do business with the rest of the world is severely curtailed.

                              Not only should the sale of Moneris be blocked, the infrastructure it depends on needs to be replaced... unless the plan is to use the revenue from the sale to build a solution that works with the rest of the world.

                              hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hamishb@mstdn.ca
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #33

                              It would be nice if our central banker PM made this a top priority.

                              Or, will his loyalties to the establishments of Bay Street and Wall Street prevail?

                              @alan

                              alan@mindly.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • hamishb@mstdn.caH hamishb@mstdn.ca

                                It would be nice if our central banker PM made this a top priority.

                                Or, will his loyalties to the establishments of Bay Street and Wall Street prevail?

                                @alan

                                alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alan@mindly.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #34

                                @hamishb I don't think the two are at odds. Were I an exec in one of the big Canadian banks, I'd be deeply concerned about the risk. Retail credit and the related transaction fees are a big contributor to revenue.

                                hamishb@mstdn.caH 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

                                  @hamishb I don't think the two are at odds. Were I an exec in one of the big Canadian banks, I'd be deeply concerned about the risk. Retail credit and the related transaction fees are a big contributor to revenue.

                                  hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hamishb@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hamishb@mstdn.ca
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #35

                                  A US cut-off would certainly be a huge problem for them, but they might be against the kind of no-fee system some here have advocated.

                                  @alan

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • alan@mindly.socialA alan@mindly.social

                                    @santi We have Interac for a low cost national system, but if our economic independence from the US is how we secure our future, then we need a system that works internationally for both trade and tourism. I want to be able to buy some cool thing from a website in Brazil with my payment card that works equally well here, and in Europe, all without the risk if a deranged narcissist being able to say "cut those people out of the system."

                                    2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    2legged@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #36

                                    @alan Are you calling Biden a "deranged narcissist"? Or you trying to evade the fact that weaponising of payment systems is a bipartisan policy of the imperialist USA?

                                    @santi

                                    alan@mindly.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                                      @alan Are you calling Biden a "deranged narcissist"? Or you trying to evade the fact that weaponising of payment systems is a bipartisan policy of the imperialist USA?

                                      @santi

                                      alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      alan@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      alan@mindly.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #37

                                      @2legged @santi That's an interesting rhetorical approach.

                                      Nonetheless, I think the corporate masters behind both parties are more interested in maintaining their hegemony and the transaction fees that come with it than they are about weaponizing it. If anything the very threat of weaponization is enough to inspire other countries to ameliorate the threat, which is decidedly not in their interests. The deranged narcissist is not working in their best interests but he doesn't care because he's a deranged narcissist.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                      Svar
                                      • Svar som emne
                                      Login for at svare
                                      • Ældste til nyeste
                                      • Nyeste til ældste
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Log ind

                                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Hjem
                                      • Seneste
                                      • Etiketter
                                      • Populære
                                      • Verden
                                      • Bruger
                                      • Grupper