Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
34 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

    "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

    That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

    stancarey@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
    stancarey@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
    stancarey@mastodon.ie
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #18

    @andrewstroehlein Yes but can we stop calling it that

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

      @Tooden that doesn't cover materials produced fearing or depicting those acts, which is why the term CSAM exists (I didn't make it up)

      tooden@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tooden@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tooden@aus.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #19

      @noodlemaz I didn't suggest it was. I had hoped you would see it as helpful, since the scum disseminating this material don't see it as such.

      noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pa27@mastodon.socialP pa27@mastodon.social

        @andrewstroehlein Why is *anyone* using a site that exploits women and children, contains child abuse, and is owned by a ketamine addicted nazi?

        jhooper@techhub.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jhooper@techhub.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jhooper@techhub.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #20

        @pa27 @andrewstroehlein Are we talking about X, Facebook, or one of those things Trump and his loser brigade tried to launch?

        pa27@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

          "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

          That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

          helgi@101010.plH This user is from outside of this forum
          helgi@101010.plH This user is from outside of this forum
          helgi@101010.pl
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #21

          @andrewstroehlein the clowns made posting nonconsensual NON nudes a crime in April 2025. So eventually some hamsawi lass Noor Lavoie-Khatib made me suspended for reposting her selfies with commentary kinda "look a white miss, looks like my sister". Maybe because her Syrian dad found a Ukrainian with French last name in that Edmonton

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

            "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

            That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gæst
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #22
            @andrewstroehlein The thing is, those journalists are themself posting there.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jhooper@techhub.socialJ jhooper@techhub.social

              @pa27 @andrewstroehlein Are we talking about X, Facebook, or one of those things Trump and his loser brigade tried to launch?

              pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              pa27@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              pa27@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #23

              @jhooper @andrewstroehlein THe OP I think referred to X, which even the FT referred to yesterday as "X, the deepfake porn site formerly known as Twitter".
              However it also beats me why anyone uses any of the Zuckerberg services, Facepalm, Insta, Whatsapp. Meta promote child abuse and misogyny as well as scams. Whatsapp becoming a de facto thing really annoys me...

              And as for Trumpistan social... is anyone but the orange demented twat and his robots on it? /rant mode off... 😃

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

                "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

                That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

                scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                scaletheory@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #24

                @andrewstroehlein

                Which site? Got more info on this?

                More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.

                scaletheory@mastodon.socialS noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • scaletheory@mastodon.socialS scaletheory@mastodon.social

                  @andrewstroehlein

                  Which site? Got more info on this?

                  More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.

                  scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  scaletheory@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #25

                  @andrewstroehlein

                  Never mind, got my answer:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

                    "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

                    That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

                    wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.host
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #26

                    @andrewstroehlein Nope. "Why is any government on ANY private site?" is the question.

                    utf_7@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

                      "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

                      That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

                      sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sassinake@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #27

                      @andrewstroehlein

                      Leavitt: "What are children, really? What is consent, but some woke nonsense. Every one knows girls belong to their fathers, until he sells them to the highest bidder. That's what my Daddy, who art in Heaven, did with me, and I turned out fine!"

                      /s

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                        @andrewstroehlein *child sexual abuse material (CSAM)

                        Sex requires consent
                        Children cannot consent
                        Sexual imagery featuring any child is abuse material, not porn. There is no 'child porn'.

                        I think this is important because phrases like this, and 'sex trafficking' or 'sex pest' minimise the crime and obscure perpetrators. We can and should hold media and commentators to account.

                        copacetic@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
                        copacetic@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
                        copacetic@social.tchncs.de
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #28

                        @noodlemaz @andrewstroehlein To me "child porn" sounds worse than a four letter acronym like "CSAM" and four full words is too long.

                        noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tooden@aus.socialT tooden@aus.social

                          @noodlemaz I didn't suggest it was. I had hoped you would see it as helpful, since the scum disseminating this material don't see it as such.

                          noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                          noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                          noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #29

                          @Tooden well, per legal definitions, not all sexual abuse is rape. So I'm not sure how helpful it is to bundle various things under that term that has (relatively) clear and important applicability already. Hope that makes sense. I don't want to go looking up various things about it right now, but.

                          When the 'sex trafficking' discussions are going on, I do tend to bring up rape - because there is no 'sex' with trafficked people, since consent requires no threat or coersion or force. And trafficked people face all or most of those.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • copacetic@social.tchncs.deC copacetic@social.tchncs.de

                            @noodlemaz @andrewstroehlein To me "child porn" sounds worse than a four letter acronym like "CSAM" and four full words is too long.

                            noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                            noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                            noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #30

                            @copacetic @andrewstroehlein my point is it is not 'porn'. Pornography is adult-produced media for adults. The second anyone involves children it stops being porn and becomes criminal abuse.

                            CSAM is two syllables. It is widely used. I'd say, do better.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

                              "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

                              That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

                              nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nilz@norden.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #31

                              Hallo @Bundesregierung ,
                              warum postet ihr noch auf einer deepfake Kinderporno Plattform?"

                              // @andrewstroehlein

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • scaletheory@mastodon.socialS scaletheory@mastodon.social

                                @andrewstroehlein

                                Which site? Got more info on this?

                                More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.

                                noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                                noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                                noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #32

                                @SCALETHEORY X, and you can find articles about the abuse images with Grok and commentary with ease if you have a quick look. Men are prompting it thousands of times in just minutes, directing it to unclothe women, children and babies.

                                (apols, your reply wasn't showing at the time)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.host

                                  @andrewstroehlein Nope. "Why is any government on ANY private site?" is the question.

                                  utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                  utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                  utf_7@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #33

                                  @Wyatt_H_Knott @andrewstroehlein to be fair, to reach the younger generations

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tofu@is-a.catT tofu@is-a.cat

                                    @andrewstroehlein *formerly, my brain is cooked right meow

                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #34

                                    @tofu @andrewstroehlein Actually, formerly and formally both fit.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper