I was immediately reminded of @catsalad

[riverpunk@defcon.social]

I was immediately reminded of @catsalad

[atrusriven@mastodon.social]

@riverpunk @catsalad That might be a correlation of nearly 0, so practically no correlation at all, rather chance. Funny, though

[heavyimage@mastodon.social]

@riverpunk @catsalad whoa these animals are so strong

[evening@alico.nexus]

@riverpunk@defcon.social okay but this is actually a terrible explanation of correlation is not causation

[jeffgrigg@mastodon.social]

@riverpunk @catsalad

I wouldn't be so sure!

Caution advised!

(But I'll "pspsps" *any* cat. ^-^ )

[maker_of_things@cupoftea.social]

@riverpunk @catsalad
So, the duck and the seagull represent corrolation, while the two cats represent causation.
Yep, that works for me!

[syn@plasmatrap.com]

@riverpunk@defcon.social @catsalad@infosec.exchange okay these are all great examples of causation but now I still dont get what correlation is

[octaviaconamore@cutie.city]

@Maker_of_Things @riverpunk @catsalad yup, because the cats are actually just dragons with their glamours activated

[gbsills@social.vivaldi.net]

@riverpunk @catsalad A surprising number of people to get this.

[softwaretheron@mas.to]

Fear the duck!