Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I've been shushing people who say there won't be free #elections in the #USA anymore

I've been shushing people who say there won't be free #elections in the #USA anymore

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
electionsusacynicismprematurecapituvote
46 Indlæg 18 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @StarkRG @em_and_future_cats

    I agree but absolute ideological position globally has no meaning. The left in Saudi Arabia might be to the right of the right in Denmark but the only metric that matters is the push and pull to either side of the ideological center of a particular country

    It does no good to say "the left in the USA is the right somewhere else" because all we care about is making the USA more left. We work with what is and iterate. This perspective is the only effective perspective

    starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
    starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
    starkrg@myside-yourside.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #36

    @benroyce @em_and_future_cats I mostly disagree. By any definition, the Democrats are conservative, they maintain the status quo, only doing the minimum to show that they're better than Republicans, and they *definitely* are, don't get me wrong. Now, it's entirely reasonable to argue that conservative and right-wing don't mean the same thing, but they usually do. The closest the US has to a left wing, the Green party, is a joke, something to make the Democrats' centric stance more reasonable.

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS starkrg@myside-yourside.net

      @benroyce @em_and_future_cats I mostly disagree. By any definition, the Democrats are conservative, they maintain the status quo, only doing the minimum to show that they're better than Republicans, and they *definitely* are, don't get me wrong. Now, it's entirely reasonable to argue that conservative and right-wing don't mean the same thing, but they usually do. The closest the US has to a left wing, the Green party, is a joke, something to make the Democrats' centric stance more reasonable.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #37

      @StarkRG @em_and_future_cats

      Again you're absolutely right. I'm just asserting that the functional perspective is more important than the structural perspective. We both want the USA to be more left. I'm concerning myself with how to do that while meanwhile this 10,000 foot view of the status quo you're providing while accurate doesn't provide any analytical value of how to do that.

      We start where we are and iterate left. That where we start sucks is true but noting that it sucks doesn't help

      starkrg@myside-yourside.netS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @StarkRG @em_and_future_cats

        Again you're absolutely right. I'm just asserting that the functional perspective is more important than the structural perspective. We both want the USA to be more left. I'm concerning myself with how to do that while meanwhile this 10,000 foot view of the status quo you're providing while accurate doesn't provide any analytical value of how to do that.

        We start where we are and iterate left. That where we start sucks is true but noting that it sucks doesn't help

        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        starkrg@myside-yourside.net
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #38

        @benroyce @em_and_future_cats I think I see what you're getting at. I think, though, that letting Democrats be called "left" lets them off the hook to be better. It makes it seem like someone having an opinion between the Democrats and Republicans is a reasonable position when, really, that just makes them a less extreme extremist. Democrats should be seen as the compromise, the centric position (even though they're more like slightly right-wing).

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS starkrg@myside-yourside.net

          @benroyce @em_and_future_cats I think I see what you're getting at. I think, though, that letting Democrats be called "left" lets them off the hook to be better. It makes it seem like someone having an opinion between the Democrats and Republicans is a reasonable position when, really, that just makes them a less extreme extremist. Democrats should be seen as the compromise, the centric position (even though they're more like slightly right-wing).

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #39

          @StarkRG @em_and_future_cats

          Because of the FPTP voting system 3rd party only divides the left and hands MAGA the win. So we are stuck with the need to take over, gut and cannibalize the democratic party and make it an apparatus of the left. And we can that. The centrists are weak and the anger is strong

          starkrg@myside-yourside.netS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • asbestos@pnw.zoneA asbestos@pnw.zone

            @benroyce
            There is no one as tedious and annoying as the "both sides suck" "you're just voting for the lesser of two evils" edgelords

            dlundh@mastodon.nuD This user is from outside of this forum
            dlundh@mastodon.nuD This user is from outside of this forum
            dlundh@mastodon.nu
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #40

            @Asbestos @benroyce also, even if true, why NOT vote for a lesser evil? 🤷

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • asbestos@pnw.zoneA asbestos@pnw.zone

              @benroyce
              There is no one as tedious and annoying as the "both sides suck" "you're just voting for the lesser of two evils" edgelords

              rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
              rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
              rupert@mastodon.nz
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #41

              @benroyce @Asbestos as if there's something wrong with wanting less evil.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rupert@mastodon.nzR rupert@mastodon.nz

                @benroyce @Asbestos as if there's something wrong with wanting less evil.

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #42

                @rupert @Asbestos

                Nevermind that a lesser evil is all you will ever get, in any timeline, in any country, in any election

                Now and forever

                If a literal demigod descended from the heavens with angels singing and ran in an election, typical politics would paint them as evil one way or another in contrived fashion, people would nod along in the usual lazy cynicism, and thus they would just be the lesser evil

                Toxic idealists and mindless cynics are fucking stupid losers

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dlundh@mastodon.nuD dlundh@mastodon.nu

                  @Asbestos @benroyce also, even if true, why NOT vote for a lesser evil? 🤷

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #43

                  @dlundh @Asbestos

                  Because if a candidate is not perfect I can't taint my perfect soul. And before I vote I have to feel like my vote is a statement of eternal love. Only then will I vote

                  Oh if I don't vote I help fascism win?

                  Well my holy sense of self-regard and my perfectionist ego masturbation is far more important than my entitled lazy inaction resulting in goons murdering people in the streets, don't you know

                  🤮🤮🤮

                  mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                    @dlundh @Asbestos

                    Because if a candidate is not perfect I can't taint my perfect soul. And before I vote I have to feel like my vote is a statement of eternal love. Only then will I vote

                    Oh if I don't vote I help fascism win?

                    Well my holy sense of self-regard and my perfectionist ego masturbation is far more important than my entitled lazy inaction resulting in goons murdering people in the streets, don't you know

                    🤮🤮🤮

                    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #44

                    @benroyce @dlundh @Asbestos

                    Don't hold back Ben, tell us what you really think. 😉

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

                      @benroyce @dlundh @Asbestos

                      Don't hold back Ben, tell us what you really think. 😉

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #45

                      @mastodonmigration @dlundh @Asbestos

                      I've got 50k such comments under my belt

                      I've got 200k more to go

                      Until my anger at nonvoting assholes who helped get us MAGA in power is quenched

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @StarkRG @em_and_future_cats

                        Because of the FPTP voting system 3rd party only divides the left and hands MAGA the win. So we are stuck with the need to take over, gut and cannibalize the democratic party and make it an apparatus of the left. And we can that. The centrists are weak and the anger is strong

                        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                        starkrg@myside-yourside.net
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #46

                        @benroyce @em_and_future_cats Oh, absolutely, I'm definitely not suggesting voting for third party candidates, at least not at a federal level. There is *some* benefit, sometimes, to voting for a third party at a state level, and there's usually benefit to third party votes at a county and city level. As long as the system is plurality, Democrats will continue to get my endorsement, but I'll be damned if I let them off the hook for being centrists.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper