Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 🗣AAAAAAAAAUGH!

🗣AAAAAAAAAUGH!

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
vaccines
56 Indlæg 30 Posters 21 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

    CP had spent millions into greasing palms in DC for changes like:

    Federal Register, Volume 59 Issue 116 (Friday, June 17, 1994) - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1994-06-17/html/94-14503.htm

    Federal Register, Volume 59 Issue 190 (Monday, October 3, 1994) - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1994-10-03/html/94-24052.htm

    these involve the definition of antimicrobial and the testing and labeling of pharmaceutical products, including cosmeceuticals like toothpaste (fluoride is a pharmaceutical, toothpaste a teeth cosmetic, hence a cosmeceutical)

    🧵…

    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    blogdiva@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    why were they spending so much money on these changes:

    you have to understand the public health context of 1994: we are still at the height of the #AIDS #pandemic but, after 12 years of fascist antigay policy from Reagan and Bush, 1994 felt like a pivot towards destigmatizing the disease.

    so some genius at CP thought it would be great for the company to pivot to “antimicrobial all the things!”

    not because soap and water weren't enough…

    not because it would stop the spread of AIDS but… 🧵

    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

      why were they spending so much money on these changes:

      you have to understand the public health context of 1994: we are still at the height of the #AIDS #pandemic but, after 12 years of fascist antigay policy from Reagan and Bush, 1994 felt like a pivot towards destigmatizing the disease.

      so some genius at CP thought it would be great for the company to pivot to “antimicrobial all the things!”

      not because soap and water weren't enough…

      not because it would stop the spread of AIDS but… 🧵

      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      blogdiva@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      they wanted to exploit fears about #AIDS by deregulating from “industry only” to “mass market” the triclosan hand detergent they only sold to hospitals and meat processing plants.

      they also wanted to side-step all the testing involved for such a move. they claimed statistical evidence would suffice for proving the soap or toothpastes were already safe, so they should only focus on the active ingredient… by redefining safety… 🧵…

      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

        they wanted to exploit fears about #AIDS by deregulating from “industry only” to “mass market” the triclosan hand detergent they only sold to hospitals and meat processing plants.

        they also wanted to side-step all the testing involved for such a move. they claimed statistical evidence would suffice for proving the soap or toothpastes were already safe, so they should only focus on the active ingredient… by redefining safety… 🧵…

        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        blogdiva@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        1994 brought us clintonian triangulation to food and drug safety:

        the bar was completely removed by basically defining safety as “it does not immediately kill you”.

        this one change is what fucked up a lot of people with weird reactions to pharmaceuticals and cosmetics they had used without a problem… 🧵…

        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

          1994 brought us clintonian triangulation to food and drug safety:

          the bar was completely removed by basically defining safety as “it does not immediately kill you”.

          this one change is what fucked up a lot of people with weird reactions to pharmaceuticals and cosmetics they had used without a problem… 🧵…

          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          blogdiva@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          since the focus on safety was now only on ACTIVE ingredients, pharma companies went to town changing INACTIVE ingredients to cut as many costs as they could and maximize profits.

          OH! did i mention that these changes went hand-in-hand with the ability of a company to "protect" their patents?

          patents were based on the original pharma recipe. not anymore. now companies could use old recipes, change one ingredient and have a completely new patent, lowering the cost of R&D, so… 🧵…

          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

            since the focus on safety was now only on ACTIVE ingredients, pharma companies went to town changing INACTIVE ingredients to cut as many costs as they could and maximize profits.

            OH! did i mention that these changes went hand-in-hand with the ability of a company to "protect" their patents?

            patents were based on the original pharma recipe. not anymore. now companies could use old recipes, change one ingredient and have a completely new patent, lowering the cost of R&D, so… 🧵…

            blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            blogdiva@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            why do i give you this background context to discuss this #RFK #MMR #vaccines nonesense?

            🗣BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IN HOW INACTIVE INGREDIENTS ARE TREATED

            my son had an anaphylactic reaction to the MMRs. you don't want to know how it feels to have the limp body of your baby after doing the “right thing” and being a responsible parent.

            but the gaslighting about inactive ingredients in vaccines and immunotherapy is what also almost killed me during chemo… 🧵…

            bich@apobangpo.spaceB blogdiva@mastodon.socialB corvidcrone@kolektiva.socialC kikokate@mstdn.partyK robotdiver@starlite.rodeoR 5 Replies Last reply
            0
            • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

              why do i give you this background context to discuss this #RFK #MMR #vaccines nonesense?

              🗣BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IN HOW INACTIVE INGREDIENTS ARE TREATED

              my son had an anaphylactic reaction to the MMRs. you don't want to know how it feels to have the limp body of your baby after doing the “right thing” and being a responsible parent.

              but the gaslighting about inactive ingredients in vaccines and immunotherapy is what also almost killed me during chemo… 🧵…

              bich@apobangpo.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
              bich@apobangpo.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
              bich@apobangpo.space
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @blogdiva

              Thank you for sharing this background and history. I'm so sorry your son had a true allergic reaction to a vaccine.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                why do i give you this background context to discuss this #RFK #MMR #vaccines nonesense?

                🗣BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IN HOW INACTIVE INGREDIENTS ARE TREATED

                my son had an anaphylactic reaction to the MMRs. you don't want to know how it feels to have the limp body of your baby after doing the “right thing” and being a responsible parent.

                but the gaslighting about inactive ingredients in vaccines and immunotherapy is what also almost killed me during chemo… 🧵…

                blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                blogdiva@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                🗣 NOT ONCE
                🗣 NOT TWICE
                🗣 THREE ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS TO CHEMOTHERAPY

                my oncologist had to scream at the hospital administrator to go deal with the insurance company so she could use the un-mixed version of my chemo.

                the insurance and the hospital decided that us poors should stick to the pre-mixed, additive-laden solution to cut costs.

                that solution almost killed me 3 times.

                but because it is NOT the active ingredient doing the harm, that cheaper version will still be peddled… 🧵…

                blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                  🗣 NOT ONCE
                  🗣 NOT TWICE
                  🗣 THREE ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS TO CHEMOTHERAPY

                  my oncologist had to scream at the hospital administrator to go deal with the insurance company so she could use the un-mixed version of my chemo.

                  the insurance and the hospital decided that us poors should stick to the pre-mixed, additive-laden solution to cut costs.

                  that solution almost killed me 3 times.

                  but because it is NOT the active ingredient doing the harm, that cheaper version will still be peddled… 🧵…

                  blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blogdiva@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  🗣ALLERGIES TESTING SHOULD BE STANDARD PROTOCOL FOR PREVENTIVE MEDICINE

                  we could see immediately, in our own toothpastes, how those changes in 1994 were wrecking havoc for some people.

                  changes in sweetners were triggering allergic reactions by the thousands, but the biggest, OMFG was the base of the paste itself.

                  🧵…

                  blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                    why do i give you this background context to discuss this #RFK #MMR #vaccines nonesense?

                    🗣BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IN HOW INACTIVE INGREDIENTS ARE TREATED

                    my son had an anaphylactic reaction to the MMRs. you don't want to know how it feels to have the limp body of your baby after doing the “right thing” and being a responsible parent.

                    but the gaslighting about inactive ingredients in vaccines and immunotherapy is what also almost killed me during chemo… 🧵…

                    corvidcrone@kolektiva.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    corvidcrone@kolektiva.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    corvidcrone@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @blogdiva

                    Ah yes. Like how Benadryl has a red dye that is a known allergen in it. And people who are most likely to need Benadryl are the people who are more likely to have an allergy or sensitivity to this particular dye, so they have to look for "hypoallergenic antihistamines". Blew my mind when I had to research this stuff for my own health.

                    autolycos@beige.partyA npars01@mstdn.socialN 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                      🗣ALLERGIES TESTING SHOULD BE STANDARD PROTOCOL FOR PREVENTIVE MEDICINE

                      we could see immediately, in our own toothpastes, how those changes in 1994 were wrecking havoc for some people.

                      changes in sweetners were triggering allergic reactions by the thousands, but the biggest, OMFG was the base of the paste itself.

                      🧵…

                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      blogdiva@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      some fuckwad in one of the subsidiaries decided to try creating a compound with silica to save money on the chalk used over 100 years to make toothpaste.

                      it ended up as exactly as you can imagine: the company paying up for “personal injury” cases and gagging people about mentioning anything in public.

                      which takes me back to the point of the triclosan patent: they literally were trying to create a need for an antimicrobial that wasn’t there…🧵

                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB ushcala@mastodon.crU 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                        some fuckwad in one of the subsidiaries decided to try creating a compound with silica to save money on the chalk used over 100 years to make toothpaste.

                        it ended up as exactly as you can imagine: the company paying up for “personal injury” cases and gagging people about mentioning anything in public.

                        which takes me back to the point of the triclosan patent: they literally were trying to create a need for an antimicrobial that wasn’t there…🧵

                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        blogdiva@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #15

                        with the #AIDS crisis, they believed #triclosan would be the inevitable product to buy, cementing the company’s market dominance in all things detergent… because they didn't even want to make soap. it was cheap chemicals all the way to the bank for this group of Fortune 500 money-grubbing morons.

                        they stuck triclosan into everything they could. after all, they held the patent to the chemical.

                        so when i asked them if they had done any studies on the effects on normal skin & gut flora 🧵…

                        artcollisions@vis.socialA blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                          with the #AIDS crisis, they believed #triclosan would be the inevitable product to buy, cementing the company’s market dominance in all things detergent… because they didn't even want to make soap. it was cheap chemicals all the way to the bank for this group of Fortune 500 money-grubbing morons.

                          they stuck triclosan into everything they could. after all, they held the patent to the chemical.

                          so when i asked them if they had done any studies on the effects on normal skin & gut flora 🧵…

                          artcollisions@vis.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          artcollisions@vis.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          artcollisions@vis.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #16

                          @blogdiva omg I am reading this whole thread while holding my breath!!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                            some fuckwad in one of the subsidiaries decided to try creating a compound with silica to save money on the chalk used over 100 years to make toothpaste.

                            it ended up as exactly as you can imagine: the company paying up for “personal injury” cases and gagging people about mentioning anything in public.

                            which takes me back to the point of the triclosan patent: they literally were trying to create a need for an antimicrobial that wasn’t there…🧵

                            ushcala@mastodon.crU This user is from outside of this forum
                            ushcala@mastodon.crU This user is from outside of this forum
                            ushcala@mastodon.cr
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #17

                            @blogdiva Hace poco hubo alertas sanitarias en varios países de América Latina por un ingrediente de la crema dental Colgate, justamente un aditivo para bajar costos https://remac-dent.mx/blogs/nuevos/retiran-una-pasta-colgate-lo-que-todo-dentista-debe-saber-y-que-si-recomendar-a-sus-pacientes

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                              with the #AIDS crisis, they believed #triclosan would be the inevitable product to buy, cementing the company’s market dominance in all things detergent… because they didn't even want to make soap. it was cheap chemicals all the way to the bank for this group of Fortune 500 money-grubbing morons.

                              they stuck triclosan into everything they could. after all, they held the patent to the chemical.

                              so when i asked them if they had done any studies on the effects on normal skin & gut flora 🧵…

                              blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              blogdiva@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #18

                              they not only said they were following FDA guidelines ―which they helped rewrite, by the way― and the testing proved triclosan didn't kill people immediately, so the products were safe to use under those guidelines.

                              not only everything i wrote going forward had to be approved by several suits in legal, this is now their legacy:

                              Antibiotic resistance linked to common household disinfectant triclosan | ScienceDaily - https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170703085348.htm

                              🧵…

                              blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                they not only said they were following FDA guidelines ―which they helped rewrite, by the way― and the testing proved triclosan didn't kill people immediately, so the products were safe to use under those guidelines.

                                not only everything i wrote going forward had to be approved by several suits in legal, this is now their legacy:

                                Antibiotic resistance linked to common household disinfectant triclosan | ScienceDaily - https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170703085348.htm

                                🧵…

                                blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #19

                                Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects - PMC - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4774862/

                                Frontiers | The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment - https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00780/full

                                Triclosan: an Instructive Tale - PMC - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5118979/

                                so, to recap:

                                1. i was there, working in one of the companies investing in the deregulation of not just testing of new pharmaceuticals but redefining testing… 🧵

                                mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects - PMC - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4774862/

                                  Frontiers | The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment - https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00780/full

                                  Triclosan: an Instructive Tale - PMC - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5118979/

                                  so, to recap:

                                  1. i was there, working in one of the companies investing in the deregulation of not just testing of new pharmaceuticals but redefining testing… 🧵

                                  mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mxchara@cyberpunk.lol
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #20

                                  @blogdiva that's definitely a case of "they should have looked at the barebones physical facts about the substance and realized maybe this would be bad to let loose in the environment". it hits a kind of "sour spot" (opposite of a sweet spot heh) in terms of being low in solubility (so it doesn't wash away quickly) and slow to release its chlorine compared to hypochlorites. But my guess is that it's just these two traits that made it seem like a great thing to put in toilets and such

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                    Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects - PMC - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4774862/

                                    Frontiers | The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment - https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00780/full

                                    Triclosan: an Instructive Tale - PMC - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5118979/

                                    so, to recap:

                                    1. i was there, working in one of the companies investing in the deregulation of not just testing of new pharmaceuticals but redefining testing… 🧵

                                    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #21

                                    2. i’ve outlined my experience with both sides of the changes:

                                    - 2a. ACTIVE ingredients, like triclosan ―which were always problematic

                                    - 2b. INACTIVE ingredients in pharmaceuticals and cosmeceuticals that are the most often involved in what the industry called “personal injury” cases. in my case it involved cancer immunotherapy. in my son’s case, immunization.

                                    all this to say: in spite of those 1994 changes, we should have more than one choice of #vaccines BECAUSE OF #ALLERGIES 🧵…

                                    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB elkwisdom@mastodon.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                      CP had spent millions into greasing palms in DC for changes like:

                                      Federal Register, Volume 59 Issue 116 (Friday, June 17, 1994) - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1994-06-17/html/94-14503.htm

                                      Federal Register, Volume 59 Issue 190 (Monday, October 3, 1994) - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1994-10-03/html/94-24052.htm

                                      these involve the definition of antimicrobial and the testing and labeling of pharmaceutical products, including cosmeceuticals like toothpaste (fluoride is a pharmaceutical, toothpaste a teeth cosmetic, hence a cosmeceutical)

                                      🧵…

                                      hackersquirrel@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hackersquirrel@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hackersquirrel@kolektiva.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #22

                                      @blogdiva
                                      For shits sake! How are we still alive at all?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                        2. i’ve outlined my experience with both sides of the changes:

                                        - 2a. ACTIVE ingredients, like triclosan ―which were always problematic

                                        - 2b. INACTIVE ingredients in pharmaceuticals and cosmeceuticals that are the most often involved in what the industry called “personal injury” cases. in my case it involved cancer immunotherapy. in my son’s case, immunization.

                                        all this to say: in spite of those 1994 changes, we should have more than one choice of #vaccines BECAUSE OF #ALLERGIES 🧵…

                                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #23

                                        we didn't have the combined MMRs in Puerto Rico when i was kid. that’s why kids adopted from countries without it, get the separate ones.

                                        the choice of separate and combined should be readily available AND FREE. money, not public health, is why we are forced into the combo; just as i was forced into anaphylactic shock 3 times to use an additives laden chemo solution.

                                        money, not science, is why the insurance and the hospital forced my doctor to use the cheaper chemo solution… 🧵…

                                        blogdiva@mastodon.socialB paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                          why do i give you this background context to discuss this #RFK #MMR #vaccines nonesense?

                                          🗣BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IN HOW INACTIVE INGREDIENTS ARE TREATED

                                          my son had an anaphylactic reaction to the MMRs. you don't want to know how it feels to have the limp body of your baby after doing the “right thing” and being a responsible parent.

                                          but the gaslighting about inactive ingredients in vaccines and immunotherapy is what also almost killed me during chemo… 🧵…

                                          kikokate@mstdn.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kikokate@mstdn.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kikokate@mstdn.party
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #24

                                          @blogdiva I have no words …😭

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper