Have you heard of Apple's decision on the rollout of Siri AI in Europe?
-
@EUCommission it's not for you to choose what options a provider give us. If we trust Apple to give us the right choice, it should be our choice as consumer to buy their products with the feature set complete.
You meddling with a free market and telling a private enterprise how they should build their products is a scary thing for a regulatory body to do.
let the market choose on its own.
@webjac @EUCommission I think you undermined your argument. If you have to choose between giving people the greatest choice or no choice at all, giving them the greatest choice is going to make the most people happy.
-
@algernon @EUCommission @gklka And it’s awesome that we have a choice to buy what we need or want.
@zsolt @algernon @EUCommission My opinion is that if Apple would play by EU rules then it would be beneficial for every user. Of course since they resist it is a hassle instead. But that’s entirely Apple’s call.
-
@zsolt @EUCommission @gklka regarding the DMA: that's a completely different discussion. You were not ranting about the DMA though but that you don't have features because of the EU and that is Apple fanboying par excellence.
And USB-C will probably be replaced at some point in the very distant future, so no need to worry about that for now. Micro-USB was the standard for like 15 years so we're safe for now. And the standard for C is evolving independent from the connector
@mr_harm @EUCommission @gklka Well, Apple users in the EU had access to similar features before the DMA, so it’s likely that some aspects of the DMA need to be reconsidered.
-
@mr_greeb @EUCommission precisely, I don't think they should regulate this much, up to this level.
It is literally what they're doing in this case.
Edit, in case it was unclear: Telling Apple they have to follow the law is literally what they did.
-
@EUCommission it's not for you to choose what options a provider give us. If we trust Apple to give us the right choice, it should be our choice as consumer to buy their products with the feature set complete.
You meddling with a free market and telling a private enterprise how they should build their products is a scary thing for a regulatory body to do.
let the market choose on its own.
@webjac @EUCommission it literally is for the EU to decide. That is what governments do.
-
@phillip @webjac @EUCommission
I agree with intelligent regulation.
Security. Privacy. Environmental impact. Etc.
But choice or otherwise of AI software is not the battle to have.
It undermines the efforts to do useful regulation.
If the EU wants to fight for interoperability it should fight Microsoft on document formats - and stop buying Microsoft software itself (which it does, hugely).
@rzeta0 @phillip @webjac @EUCommission It does no undermine anything, and we are adults enough to work on more than a single thing in a decade.
-
@Javensbukan @EUCommission Oh don't get me wrong. I think Apple should offer more models. I just don't think they should be forced to do so.
In the end, the reality of the matter is that both Apple and the EU want to "protect" me, and I end up without the features I want. Let me be an adult, I can take care of myself and make my own choices.
@webjac @EUCommission I'm just trying to understand how you can want more choices but then not want laws to be enforced that require equal choice and access.
I'm not understanding the logic there.
-
Have you heard of Apple's decision on the rollout of Siri AI in Europe? Let's get the facts straight
️@EUCommission On Mastodon of all places, I did not expect Apple users whining in the comments.
-
@Javensbukan @EUCommission Oh don't get me wrong. I think Apple should offer more models. I just don't think they should be forced to do so.
In the end, the reality of the matter is that both Apple and the EU want to "protect" me, and I end up without the features I want. Let me be an adult, I can take care of myself and make my own choices.
@webjac @Javensbukan @EUCommission And the point is that Apple is removing choice for all users, then stomping the ground and withholding one feature.
If all Apple fanboys would direct anger where it belongs, Apple would stop this silly behaviour sooner, so let’s stop being weirdly antagonistic against EU when they do good things
-
Have you heard of Apple's decision on the rollout of Siri AI in Europe? Let's get the facts straight
️@EUCommission no, the reason is that Apple does not want ANY random LLM to be able to scan our phones, the EU and their braindead people deciding on this should get their shit together and simply allow Apple to use what they think is the best. I want SIRI AI and I don't want you to dictate what Apple can or cannot! I hope my country leaves the EU soon, I really hope so!
-
@tragivictoria @EUCommission @gklka What are we protecting with these overcomplicated rules that end up in annoying cookie alerts at the end? Are we forcing “interoperability” on customers who clearly don’t care? I’ll buy an Android phone if I want interoperability and replaceable services.
@zsolt no, nobody have to put cookies banner on his site, if he don't tracks you.
The shame of cookie banner is on site owners, not EU. Please. -
@zsolt @algernon @EUCommission My opinion is that if Apple would play by EU rules then it would be beneficial for every user. Of course since they resist it is a hassle instead. But that’s entirely Apple’s call.
@gklka @algernon @EUCommission We don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes, which is fucking frustrating, because as a user I shouldn’t even care about that. What I do care about is that I can’t use features of a product I bought (for years) because of political games.
I’m not saying Apple is doing the right thing here. They are not. But neither the EU.
-
@lumi @leeloo @EUCommission I agree with you there. I think Europe should be promoting more competition and more ethical choices rather than regulating what exists
@webjac @lumi @leeloo @EUCommission That’s a bit of a false dilemma. We should and can do both.
-
@lumi @webjac @EUCommission
And thus we need stronger laws, not weaker.@leeloo @lumi @EUCommission I disagree on that solution, but I'm no expert on that
-
@phillip @webjac @EUCommission
I agree with intelligent regulation.
Security. Privacy. Environmental impact. Etc.
But choice or otherwise of AI software is not the battle to have.
It undermines the efforts to do useful regulation.
If the EU wants to fight for interoperability it should fight Microsoft on document formats - and stop buying Microsoft software itself (which it does, hugely).
@rzeta0 @phillip @EUCommission that's a better use of their time, totally agree.
-
@gklka @algernon @EUCommission We don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes, which is fucking frustrating, because as a user I shouldn’t even care about that. What I do care about is that I can’t use features of a product I bought (for years) because of political games.
I’m not saying Apple is doing the right thing here. They are not. But neither the EU.
@zsolt @algernon @EUCommission As much as I love Apple, they are for the money here and EU is for us.
-
@gklka @algernon @EUCommission We don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes, which is fucking frustrating, because as a user I shouldn’t even care about that. What I do care about is that I can’t use features of a product I bought (for years) because of political games.
I’m not saying Apple is doing the right thing here. They are not. But neither the EU.
@zsolt @gklka @EUCommission What is wrong with the EU trying to enforce that all players play by the same rules?
Because that's the gist of this, really.
-
@samueljohnson @EUCommission I just don't want anybody thinking they're defending my interest. I'm an adult, let me defend my interests myself.
@webjac @samueljohnson @EUCommission That reads like Apple PR propaganda. «I agree but here’s how I completely don’t agree and companies should be able to do anything they want!»
-
@zsolt @gklka @EUCommission What is wrong with the EU trying to enforce that all players play by the same rules?
Because that's the gist of this, really.
@algernon @gklka @EUCommission Nothing is wrong with that. But that’s not what is happening in real life, and the customer gets punished.
-
@EUCommission You are neither acting in the sense of consumers nor in the interests of European software businesses. The problem in this is case is *you* - the EU commission. You are hindering software innovation made in the EU.You are hindering business opportunities. Most users give a shit about third-party AI or third-party integrations. Customers are interested in devices with maximum privacy. This is what Apple stands for. The ego trip of the EU commission is hilarious. Get over it.
@zopyx @EUCommission
Standard iCloud protection is the default, and under that model Apple keeps the keys for much of the user’s cloud data in its data centers. Apple says this allows it to decrypt data for recovery, restoring backups, and signing in on a new device.
Even with Advanced Data Protection, not everything is fully end-to-end encrypted. Apple explicitly lists iCloud Mail, Contacts, and Calendars as categories that do not use end-to-end encryption, and it says some metadata remains under standard protection with keys stored by Apple.In several categories, more privacy-focused providers such as GrapheneOS, Proton, and Signal go further by making stronger encryption or stricter data isolation part of the product design rather than an optional extra.
