🏷️ AI content is getting labels.
-
️ AI content is getting labels. Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission Ok, a good start. From the top of my head I'd also like to see what were the main sources of training data, was it stolen, and how much energy was consumed in the training process.
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
Credit where credit is due
-
@EUCommission how is this enforced?
@jansteen @EUCommission it almost sounds like this code is opt-in.
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission
Good move, hope you can enforce it! -
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission
Now make use of it illegal in all merchandice and adverticement unless the company can prove they trained their LLM with only their own data which theh fully own the copyright for.Also ban public LLM's (also known as Generative AI) for its proven copyright infringement of unfathomable quantity that should not be in the hands of consumers of companies. Fight the erosion of information, ownership, and the very ability for humans to think for themselves.
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
Great move, but somehow that will not work for malignant toxic actors that will use AI to deceive us.
An electronic signature indicating the traceable source would be a start.
-
Great move, but somehow that will not work for malignant toxic actors that will use AI to deceive us.
An electronic signature indicating the traceable source would be a start.
@xs4me2 What would that signature do?
-
@EUCommission how is this enforced?
@jansteen @EUCommission From the link: "Today, the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling of AI-generated content. The Code is voluntary and" will therefore not be enforced.
-
@jansteen @EUCommission From the link: "Today, the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling of AI-generated content. The Code is voluntary and" will therefore not be enforced.
@stiiin @EUCommission thnx, i was afraid of that...
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission the CE one is so stupid, also the one with the trash bin. hate it on my iPhone...
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission Another tool to make us pay..
Your certificates on all things just made the price up with same quality, stop your scam.
You benefit only the wealthy.
If you go on soon we will have a handful only of big corps ruling over EU, not you.
And MOSTLY not the citizens!!!!!!
In these times you dare come out with more certificates to pay?
Shame on you!
Hey but you grow what you seed. -
@EUCommission the CE one is so stupid, also the one with the trash bin. hate it on my iPhone...
@d4v @EUCommission are you aware of what the CE mark actually means?
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission this is very weak.
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission A self-enforced labelling system is the same as not doing anything: the ones who were transparent will use the tag, but the ones who weren't will move on without disclosing AI use.
Please stop beating around the bush and forbid GenAI that's been trained with stolen data and regulate datacenters already.
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission You ain't get my passaport scan. Stop this crap. #NoToAgeVerifications #KeepRefugeesHere
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission Weak, bland, useless.
-
@EUCommission one of these labels is not like the others.
@thesdev @EUCommission Because Leyen isso incompetent
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
the CE label really isn’t the good example you think it is
also energy labels? I’m all for those energy classes and normed labels… but then there was that A+++±Fuckup?
…and that was solved by making the previous A into a C and the previous A++ into A? And the label looked the same? Because making it distinct would be too obvious?
All I’m saying is: your idea might be okay, but the examples are stupid
-
️ AI content is getting labels.
Just like energy ratings or safety certifications help you make informed choices, the same logic now applies to AI.
From 2 August 2026, the AI Act will require clear labelling in key cases:
Deepfakes AI-generated or manipulated content Interactions with chatbots and AI systems You have the right to know whether what you see, hear or read has been made or altered by AI
@EUCommission And today, as heard in the actual AI-Podcast "KI-Update" from @heiseonline big companys like #ikea, #H&M, #zalando, #inditex wrote a letter to act against this and want to have an exeption. Because, AI-Models for clothing photos or fakes for living rooms are much cheaper than paying a model for a photoshooting or an interieur designer to put the newest Smörebrod-Furniture in a room. And, will they get that exeption? Of course they will. 🤨
-
the CE label really isn’t the good example you think it is
also energy labels? I’m all for those energy classes and normed labels… but then there was that A+++±Fuckup?
…and that was solved by making the previous A into a C and the previous A++ into A? And the label looked the same? Because making it distinct would be too obvious?
All I’m saying is: your idea might be okay, but the examples are stupid
@dat @EUCommission It is all scam!!! there are no other models!
Same for housing, just pay the expert a sum and he gives it an A to your building's isolation is how things work but EU commision wants to enforce that even and add even more.
I swear each day this account posts it makes me regret to be born in EU frankly if I was rich I would leave now immediatly
Post this on W and leave us alone, frankly daily I read some idiotic add of you> imma block you and ya server.
