Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
Hay, there is like four of them at an intersection walking distance from me.
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
@elfin Fuck Flock
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
@elfin Of course, it would be an invasion of privacy to spray paint them all bright yellow.
Avoiding the lenses of course. -
@elfin Fuck Flock
-
@elfin spread the word!!
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
@elfin
How about we remove the cameras instead? ( #SmashFascismChallenge ) -
@elfin
How about we remove the cameras instead? ( #SmashFascismChallenge )@knutson_brain Angle Grinder or SawsAll (or plasma cutter but that's not very inconspicuous).
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
There is no right of expectation of privacy on a public Street
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
@elfin But aren't they just pulling the data from OSM? They aren't the source of the data, so removing that map does nothing, just means someone has to spend the time create another one..
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
@elfin they have a legal right to get Sawzall'd.
-
@elfin But aren't they just pulling the data from OSM? They aren't the source of the data, so removing that map does nothing, just means someone has to spend the time create another one..
@tony *Tiger Smile* CORRECT!
OSM gives zero fucks (I'm told) and it's "Open" Street Map so anyone can (and will) just make a new one, and I've exported the data to my maps (NextCloud) so all I have to do is import it again AND SHARE this data with anyone who wants it.
Anyway, no judge (except perhaps the Fifth Circuit) will grant Flock this so I/We aren't worried.
-
There is no right of expectation of privacy on a public Street
@w_b For US, but not for THEM, it seems.
-
@elfin Of course, it would be an invasion of privacy to spray paint them all bright yellow.
Avoiding the lenses of course.@wyliecoyoteuk "Don't Shoot Me" Lime Green and Yellow - Striped.
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
Corporations are people too
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
-
Corporations are people too
@GhostOnTheHalfShell I'm sorry, did you say something?
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
Quick everyone, print out the Flock map for your area in case they take it down
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
sigh
this is a legal demand letter
maybe the reason is that Flock thinks it can scare people off by the cost of litigation, and has nothing at all to do with what Flock does or doesn't think about thier right to privacy
-
Flock thinks it's cameras have a legal right to privacy in public.
@elfin Sauce for the goose, Mister Saavik.
