Amnesty International bows down to UK TERFs

[annabaguenaude@tenforward.social]

@Tooden it is, but apparently she had the means to ruin them. So I'm furious, but I also understand why they are making that choice, to keep fighting another day. @larsmb @Natasha_Jay

[agnesbc@social.vivaldi.net]

@Natasha_Jay Amnesty may have felt that particular paper was difficult to defend in court, and they were facing lawsuits from multiple organizations with billionaire backing.

I am not jumping to conclusions about their wider position yet.

I think more significantly, GLP has started proceedings with the Charities Commission against Sex Matters for promoting hate and undermining rights.

https://goodlawproject.org/sex-matters-are-breaking-charity-law-with-transphobic-hate-were-taking-action/

I think vague and possibly poorly researched policy papers are risky for ally organizations, but going after the hate groups with specific allegations is better.

[lazarou@mastodon.social]

@Natasha_Jay they will not stand against Billionaire Bigots then...

#AmnestyInternational #JKRowling

[canleaf@mastodon.social]

@AnnaBaguenaude @Tooden @larsmb @Natasha_Jay still I expect AIUK to stand up steadfast against trans and lgbt hate.

[larsmb@mastodon.online]

@AnnaBaguenaude @Tooden @Natasha_Jay "Mixed feelings", to say the least.

This is the kind of fight I'd expect Amnesty International to pick.

[nini@oldbytes.space]

@celeduc @Natasha_Jay JK Rowling and her gang of TERFs threatening to SLAPP lawsuit them.

[crazyeddie@mastodon.social]

@celeduc @Natasha_Jay JK Rowling.

[daiversity@kind.social]

@Natasha_Jay which international organization is actively defending trans rights?

[dylanwolters@floss.social]

@Natasha_Jay Moments like this represent the spiritual death of an organization.

Amnesty International is making clear that its previously stated values no longer represent their current priorities.

[jerrej@mastodon.social]

@Natasha_Jay

"AIUK remains fully committed to defending the human rights, dignity, and equality of all marginalised groups, including women, girls, and members of the trans community."

Isn't this more nuanced than your take suggests?

[kagan@wandering.shop]

@androcat @Natasha_Jay archive.org has got all our backs:

https://web.archive.org/web/20260731132113/https://www.amnesty.org.uk/knowledge-hub/all-resources/the-anti-rights-movement/

[natasha_jay@tech.lgbt]

@dylanwolters
That is exactly why I shared.

We are seeing LGBTQ organizations and media in the UK become LG(B) organizations already. Yes you Stonewall, yes you Pink News etc

Thin end of the wedge...

[natasha_jay@tech.lgbt]

@jerrej
No, it's not. They caved.

[natasha_jay@tech.lgbt]

@kagan
Thanks.
@androcat

[kechpaja@social.kechpaja.com]

@Natasha_Jay didn't the leader (or some high-ranking official at least) in Amnesty make a comment basically criticizing Ukraine for the fact that their cities were in the way of Russian missile strikes, a few years ago?

I would have lost faith in the organization after this if I still had any faith left to lose.

[kagan@wandering.shop]

@Natasha_Jay @androcat Happy to help!

[cve@sisyphus.gay]

@Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt has anyone an archive.org link to the original statement they now redacted and unpublished?

[liufahua@fairy.id]

@Natasha_Jay Have you considered whether transgenderism—which runs counter to natural genetic selection—causes physical harm to the individual, as well as the breakdown of social norms and ethical standards?

[jerrej@mastodon.social]

@Natasha_Jay

There is no nuance. Check.

[diffrentcolours@tech.lgbt]

@jerrej @Natasha_Jay Not really. They say that after they say that anti-trans organisations aren't "anti rights".