I don't want a city on Mars

[xchaos@f.cz]

@greenpeace wait, I was told, that there are too many bees, in some regions (partly because of human-organized honey production). They are pushing other pollinators out of local ecosystems...

As for the other points, well, small Antarctic-base sized scientific settlement on Mars would be cool, but huge 2-stage rocket without high-power 3rd stage probably won't be enough for that, which was now officially admitted, after all.

The AI bubble is problem. And as for water and climate, nobody can deny this, of course.

[gokushrm@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace food medicine education electricity at very low cost for every normal person, that's all I want

[vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net]

@greenpeace agreed. For those who don't want AI in every app, we're still standing

[basstreble@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace a city on Mars for all Billionairs on earth would be fine for me
#chasethedevil
#sendthemtoouterspace

[mdfffcom@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace agree! I want it too, I wanna live in a world with lots of trees and electricity and education isn't expensive

[sesav@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace This isn't exciting enough for the people in charge of current events.

[irmgard@sueden.social]

@greenpeace That makes no sense for the capitalists. Because these people don't earn any money that way.
Capitalism has become a doomsday machine.

[greensofshade@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace Insects (more than just bees!)

[greenpeace@mastodon.social]

@henry_null

[ministerofimpediments@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace
Well…I can honestly say what you are likely to get is none.
But they’ll certainly kill the last three to grift money for the first three…

…and that was always the plan.

[gimulnautti@mastodon.green]

@greenpeace I think it won’t be more than 10 years, before Elon Musk after his data centers in space failing, suggests that it would be better to launch humans into space so we can fit more data centers on earth…

By that time he’s already become techno-pope with his own religion, and will frame all this is ”spiritual” cultish terms, like ”expanding the light of conciousness” or similar.

[pasci_lei@social.pascal-leinert.de]

@greenpeace@mastodon.social You can literally have both.

[clintonanderson@universeodon.com]

@greenpeace

I want clean water

I want a stable climate

I want and end to extinctions

But this rock is doomed. We have to get off it, in a significant manner.

[xmacdonald@mstdn.ca]

@greenpeace They didn't ask us because they don't care what we want.

[faithlessaint@mastodon.social]

@greenpeace I want environnemental protection and technological advancements walking side by side.

[woe2you@beige.party]

@greenpeace

I do not like it, Sam Alt-man
I do not want your AI spam.

[aka_quant_noir@hcommons.social]

@greenpeace

I don't want unlimited growth.
I don't want unlimited wealth.
I don't want dictatorial rule.

I want respect for indigenous ways.
I want use of indigenous technologies.
I want sequestration of fossil fuels.

[soulsource@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@greenpeace You might want to _read_ "A city on Mars" though.

(It's a really good book about how feasible a colony on Mars actually is. Spoiler: It isn't. https://www.acityonmars.com/)

[redred@defcon.social]

@greenpeace And children to stop being fucking killed

[yewa@troet.cafe]

@henry_null @greenpeace Vielleicht der @TommyKrappweis?