Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
profsamlecturet
32 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

    greem@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    greem@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    greem@cyberplace.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #16

    @sundogplanets and then there's TeraWave, which is Jeff's high bandwidth space based 5k+ LEO, 18 MEO constellation which starts launching next year.

    They just keep on banging 'em up there 🙁

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

      dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      dockwalk@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #17

      @sundogplanets
      is there a map?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

        bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bojanlandekic@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #18

        @sundogplanets scene in a netflix scifi movie: why are the stars following me? Those arent stars those are drones and satepites...run!!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

          There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

          1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

          kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #19

          @sundogplanets

          is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

          Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

            There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

            1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

            newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
            newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
            newstik@social.heise.de
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #20

            @sundogplanets Blue Origin announced TeraWave today.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

              @sundogplanets

              Here is thought experiment, which might make you incredibly depressed if being any more depressed in this day and age as possible: these satellites have a definite lifetime, and there is some expectation that some of them will become damaged and fall from orbit.

              Injection of satellites means a consequential and maybe exponential death rates. That’s just basic demographics.

              growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
              growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
              growthhexis@theforkiverse.com
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #21

              @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets this sounds like a business opportunity - satellite safety and recycling co. #darkhumor

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #22

                @sundogplanets 🤬☹️

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                  There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                  1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                  nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nead@social.vivaldi.net
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #23

                  @sundogplanets Keep fighting the good fight, Professor. We need someone to give us accurate information we can rely on.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                    thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #24

                    @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT thejacenallen@mastodon.social

                      @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #25

                      @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                      crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                        crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
                        crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
                        crazypedia@mypocketpals.online
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #26

                        @sundogplanets@mastodon.social @thejacenallen@mastodon.social and dont swear when there's a big launch between updates and presentation 😅

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK kitkat_blue@mastodon.social

                          @sundogplanets

                          is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

                          Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #27

                          @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                          kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                            thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #28

                            @sundogplanets oh yeah the math. No way. I would never attempt this myself.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                              kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #29

                              @sundogplanets

                              Tyvm!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                                kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #30

                                @sundogplanets

                                So, "yearly excess of more than 640% above natural (meteorite contribution) levels" plus "a noticeable delay (~30 years) between the beginning of the injection process when orbiting bodies are decommissioned and the eventual ozone-depletion consequences in the stratosphere." seems to add up to a potential ticking time bomb for the ozone layer. 😰

                                Other than saying "significant" they don't attempt to quantify the impact...i'd be curious as to what that might be.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                  There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                  1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #31

                                  Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                                  There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                                  #ProfSamLectureTour

                                  austinross@social.lolA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                                    There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                                    #ProfSamLectureTour

                                    austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    austinross@social.lol
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #32

                                    @sundogplanets Will future generations be able to see the stars? Can we decommission these satellites? Or are we turning the sky into another landfill?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper