please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial technically when had LLMs forced on me as part of trying to get customer service etc, I've verbally abused them for a while until they pissed off, but, interpreting your question as "How frequently you willingly chat with LLM?" I picked never. ~~~~
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'm secretly a fan of AI/LLM's but no, I won't use them in their current form.
Once it's modular - I can fit it easily into a linux PC
Once it's user-trainable - And not a theft machine of the arts and commons for the richest people on earth
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial what do you mean with „chat“ ? Talking or working? I am a developer and I use it for developing and testing
-
@indigoparadox I miss old search too! duck duck go still has one.
@falcennial I mean, DuckDuckGo was my first stop until recently, but it's even worse at finding things than StartPage which I always end up at, so I just started defaulting to that. And that isn't great at finding stuff either! No boolean operators, and stuff just plain doesn't turn up!
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
Like, chat as a fake friend? Hell no.
Or one-shot "explain why this SQL code thing isnt working". Yeah, I do that.
Going through a SQL class right now, and the LLM output IS helpful, when compared to #Zybooks. Fuck Zybooks. Worse than slop.
These things are crystallized associations of knowledge copied from everything thats not bolted down.
LLM tools are useful, but they are tools. Atttributing "chat" or communication is anthropomorphizing a massive multi billion dimensional array.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Does the auto google thing count? I sometimes accidentally find myself not using duckduckgo
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Honestly, I wouldn’t know how to. I’m sure I could if I was bothered but I’m not.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial @dgar But voting on ActivityPub is not anonymous. While there is no interface to see it, it can be extracted through API, from what I recall.
What does chatting mean here? Using LLM or specifically thinking that I have a chat with a sentiment being?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'd say not at all because I don't use it for assistance, but I put a couple times a month because I do occasionally chat with it to test its limits (biases, boundaries, absurdities)
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Chat in the sense I ask it to look something up for me. Or write a risk assessment for scouts. I don't ask how it's hanging. That would be weird.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial okay, I did try it out twice.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Chat? Like a conversation? Never. I will admit to using an LLM to convert a normal paragraph into a structured format my Director wants event summaries in, does that count?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial 'Chat' voluntarily, I don't. I am sometimes forced to use LLM chatbots as a sort of text-based phone-tree so I can get to the actual person I need to talk to or form I need to fill out.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Privately, almost never. At work, over 1 hour per day. If my employee has nothing against putting their code into suspicious system, that’s not my problem!
-
@Rhodium103
nicely put.@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Define "chat with." Does "yell at to do stuff in copilot-cli" count?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial does spamming variations on "let me speak to a human" cause there's no other way to get support for services count? otherwise none
-
@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
@dalias lol. This is so real
-
@falcennial Privately, almost never. At work, over 1 hour per day. If my employee has nothing against putting their code into suspicious system, that’s not my problem!
@falcennial @aemstuz What an opportunity to put backdoors all over the system. “LLM gave me this code”.
