Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. “A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication.

“A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
2 Indlæg 2 Posters 2 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gregegansf@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
    gregegansf@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
    gregegansf@mathstodon.xyz
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    “A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication. The journal publisher, Springer Nature, cited “discrepancies” in the analysis and a lack of confidence in the conclusions—but not before the paper racked up hundreds of citations and made the rounds on social media.”

    https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/influential-study-touting-chatgpt-in-education-retracted-over-red-flags/

    tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • gregegansf@mathstodon.xyzG gregegansf@mathstodon.xyz

      “A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication. The journal publisher, Springer Nature, cited “discrepancies” in the analysis and a lack of confidence in the conclusions—but not before the paper racked up hundreds of citations and made the rounds on social media.”

      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/influential-study-touting-chatgpt-in-education-retracted-over-red-flags/

      tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
      tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
      tpfto@mathstodon.xyz
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @gregeganSF In cases like these, a retraction feels not unlike closing the barn door after the entire herd has already fled.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
      Svar
      • Svar som emne
      Login for at svare
      • Ældste til nyeste
      • Nyeste til ældste
      • Most Votes


      • Log ind

      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      Graciously hosted by data.coop
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Hjem
      • Seneste
      • Etiketter
      • Populære
      • Verden
      • Bruger
      • Grupper