This is truly glorious #AISlop from #Microslop in their "Introduction to Github" course.
-
@jackeric basically the same picture right
-
@itgrrl @dazfuller
You are not Morg! You are not I-Morg! -
@JennyFluff
The things Tim has seen.
@dazfuller@ohmrun @JennyFluff don’t talk to Tim about the old Morging, he was there (or will be eventually) at the beginning
-
@jackeric @dazfuller so they also stole this essentially then?
-
@Nymnympseudonymm this is great
Now excuse me while I cleanse it with fire
-
That was the beginning of the great Tim wars, which continue to this day
-
@dazfuller as I shared with @munin
I love the English #language! Ever-evolving with new verbs and terms. (Now, with #slopification!) In this instance, I’ll gladly employ “to morg” because, based purely on context, it seems to be defined as
morg / mɔrg /
verb
to cause a deadly or grossly negligent outcome upon mergeUse in a sentence
*After the changes were shipped, they published just before failover and morged the live, resulting in an outage for the on call.*@aleciabatson @munin if this isn’t standard terminology by middle of the year then I’ll be devastated
-
This is truly glorious #AISlop from #Microslop in their "Introduction to Github" course.
I don't know why Tim is working in the opposite direction, but I can see that he never once "morges" his code back into develop, let alone doing it "continvoucly"
Update:
It looks as though after 4-5 months the page has been updated, but if you want to see the image in situ still then the way back machine has you covered.
@dazfuller no wonder they are barely able to make working software anymore.
-
This is truly glorious #AISlop from #Microslop in their "Introduction to Github" course.
I don't know why Tim is working in the opposite direction, but I can see that he never once "morges" his code back into develop, let alone doing it "continvoucly"
Update:
It looks as though after 4-5 months the page has been updated, but if you want to see the image in situ still then the way back machine has you covered.
@dazfuller There is a theory that all merges and commits are just a single Tim moving backwards and forward in the git history...
-
@dazfuller WHAT IS THAT VERTICAL ARROW? WHO IS TINM? NM ISN'T EVEN A DEFINED LIGATURE
(as far as I can tell)
(but it does exist maybe? maybe as a phonetic marker:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nm_ligature.svg
)
I am so confused
@moira Maybe Tinm is real, they’re going back to save us
-
@dazfuller this is embarrassing, I will bitch internally
@mapache just please don’t throw Tinm under the bus, it’ll disrupt the space time continuum
-
@jackeric @dazfuller so they also stole this essentially then?
@thibaultmol @jackeric stole "and improved with AI"
-
This is truly glorious #AISlop from #Microslop in their "Introduction to Github" course.
I don't know why Tim is working in the opposite direction, but I can see that he never once "morges" his code back into develop, let alone doing it "continvoucly"
Update:
It looks as though after 4-5 months the page has been updated, but if you want to see the image in situ still then the way back machine has you covered.
@dazfuller Tim with and extra ∩
-
@dallo
It was a nice diagram, but poor workflow even in 2010. The gitworkflows(7) man page was first written in 2008 and had clear rationale. I made this figure in that era to show the parallelism exposed by the workflow. As CI has become more robust, many projects moved away from having a 'next' as a throw-away integration branch, but it is a useful strategy especially if you want user feedback on experimental features before you commit to including them by merging to 'main' (formerly 'master').
https://git-scm.com/docs/gitworkflows
@dazfuller -
@dazfuller the course page has been updated; I don't see this image in there.
-
@dazfuller and stolen from sources like https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
@thezeronine@mastodon.pnpde.social @dazfuller@mstdn.social wow that is way more clearly stolen then I thought, damn
-
@itgrrl @dazfuller this almost made me choke on my covfefe thanks
-
This is truly glorious #AISlop from #Microslop in their "Introduction to Github" course.
I don't know why Tim is working in the opposite direction, but I can see that he never once "morges" his code back into develop, let alone doing it "continvoucly"
Update:
It looks as though after 4-5 months the page has been updated, but if you want to see the image in situ still then the way back machine has you covered.
@dazfuller -squints- I think his name might be Tirm
-
This is truly glorious #AISlop from #Microslop in their "Introduction to Github" course.
I don't know why Tim is working in the opposite direction, but I can see that he never once "morges" his code back into develop, let alone doing it "continvoucly"
Update:
It looks as though after 4-5 months the page has been updated, but if you want to see the image in situ still then the way back machine has you covered.
@dazfuller But you know what they mean if you already know what they teach on that page! So why be so picky?
-
@dazfuller
And this is the figure from the 2010 blog post that their machine plagiarized (badly).
https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/@jedbrown@hachyderm.io @dazfuller@mstdn.social Thank you... I knew it was incredibly familiar, but the familiar version, felt like it was not too bad (hey it may not be perfect, but it's certainly not confusing like, "hey what why huh..."). Much appreciated.
️
