Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I don't care if the homeless person we house or the refugee person we welcome is a "good investment".

I don't care if the homeless person we house or the refugee person we welcome is a "good investment".

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
16 Indlæg 9 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT thejessiekirk@ohai.social

    I don't care if the homeless person we house or the refugee person we welcome is a "good investment".

    Humanity is not a business.

    I just want as many HUMAN BEINGS to be warm, happy, safe and healthy as possible.

    Wrap that up in whatever political affilliation you care too, it's how we should all feel.

    Geeze, what is wrong with us??

    donhawkins@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    donhawkins@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    donhawkins@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6

    @thejessiekirk @Binder Billionaires & Trillionaires.

    starkrg@myside-yourside.netS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • donhawkins@mastodon.socialD donhawkins@mastodon.social

      @Verati404 @thejessiekirk Some rich a-hole & his political crony created that Faux Skews of which you speak. #EatTheRich

      verati404@socel.netV This user is from outside of this forum
      verati404@socel.netV This user is from outside of this forum
      verati404@socel.net
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @donhawkins @thejessiekirk Oh yeah, I know. And they've had to settle lawsuits in the past by pleading that they aren't "real" news, yet they're allowed to broadcast as if they are. And too many of my fellow USians believe they are! It's infuriating.

      donhawkins@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • verati404@socel.netV verati404@socel.net

        @donhawkins @thejessiekirk Oh yeah, I know. And they've had to settle lawsuits in the past by pleading that they aren't "real" news, yet they're allowed to broadcast as if they are. And too many of my fellow USians believe they are! It's infuriating.

        donhawkins@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        donhawkins@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        donhawkins@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @Verati404 @thejessiekirk Well if it’s any encouragement at all, THIS 74 y/o recycled his 3 TVs 2-years ago, and no longer watch ANY TV. I’ve also deleted ALL ‘commercial’ social network accounts with the lone exception of YouTube thus far. It’s all Fediverse, all the time these days, for me.

        verati404@socel.netV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • donhawkins@mastodon.socialD donhawkins@mastodon.social

          @thejessiekirk @Binder Billionaires & Trillionaires.

          starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
          starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
          starkrg@myside-yourside.net
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder

          Honestly, a lot of the upper millionaires too. There's really no reason for anyone to have a net worth of more than US$250 million at any one time. That's why I propose a wealth cap, when their *NET* worth (not just bank accounts, but everything they own) is more than US$250 million all income would be taxed at 100%. They'd get their normal tax rates back if they fall below that level, though.

          donhawkins@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • donhawkins@mastodon.socialD donhawkins@mastodon.social

            @Verati404 @thejessiekirk Well if it’s any encouragement at all, THIS 74 y/o recycled his 3 TVs 2-years ago, and no longer watch ANY TV. I’ve also deleted ALL ‘commercial’ social network accounts with the lone exception of YouTube thus far. It’s all Fediverse, all the time these days, for me.

            verati404@socel.netV This user is from outside of this forum
            verati404@socel.netV This user is from outside of this forum
            verati404@socel.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @donhawkins @thejessiekirk I am very glad that you didn't let yourself get taken in by propaganda. I'm just sad for all the folks that have, who've let themselves get changed by hateful shifting goalposts and misinformation.

            The world as it is today has been engineered by many horrible people in charge to be the shithole it is now, but it could've been good. And with effort, I hope it swings the other direction before it's too late (esp climate-wise).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS starkrg@myside-yourside.net

              @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder

              Honestly, a lot of the upper millionaires too. There's really no reason for anyone to have a net worth of more than US$250 million at any one time. That's why I propose a wealth cap, when their *NET* worth (not just bank accounts, but everything they own) is more than US$250 million all income would be taxed at 100%. They'd get their normal tax rates back if they fall below that level, though.

              donhawkins@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              donhawkins@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              donhawkins@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @StarkRG @thejessiekirk @Binder Bernie was correct, billionaires shouldn’t exist (& as you’ve mentioned, upper millionaires).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                starkrg@myside-yourside.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12

                @gooba42 @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder Keep in mind that I'm specifically talking about net worth. Your house, your cars, your private plane, your overseas assets, your company shares. That's why the cap is set so high, it's not just the liquid assets that are counted.

                gooba42@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT thejessiekirk@ohai.social

                  I don't care if the homeless person we house or the refugee person we welcome is a "good investment".

                  Humanity is not a business.

                  I just want as many HUMAN BEINGS to be warm, happy, safe and healthy as possible.

                  Wrap that up in whatever political affilliation you care too, it's how we should all feel.

                  Geeze, what is wrong with us??

                  lediva@lediva.masto.hostL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lediva@lediva.masto.hostL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lediva@lediva.masto.host
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @thejessiekirk capitalism

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS starkrg@myside-yourside.net

                    @gooba42 @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder Keep in mind that I'm specifically talking about net worth. Your house, your cars, your private plane, your overseas assets, your company shares. That's why the cap is set so high, it's not just the liquid assets that are counted.

                    gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gooba42@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    @StarkRG @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder Oh yeah, I intend the same. For *wealth*, all will be considered.

                    For income, it's also *all* compensation of any kind.

                    You can still live a life of luxury while everybody gets fed. You just can't be a trillionaire.

                    starkrg@myside-yourside.netS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gooba42@mastodon.socialG gooba42@mastodon.social

                      @StarkRG @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder Oh yeah, I intend the same. For *wealth*, all will be considered.

                      For income, it's also *all* compensation of any kind.

                      You can still live a life of luxury while everybody gets fed. You just can't be a trillionaire.

                      starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                      starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                      starkrg@myside-yourside.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @gooba42 @donhawkins @thejessiekirk @Binder

                      Setting it too low would essentially preclude anyone from being a sole owner of a successful business.

                      And, yeah, it would be all income, including appreciation of valuable property. If you're already at or above the cap and your house gets reassessed at $20,000 more than it had been, well, then you owe $20,000 in taxes. Bought a $1million painting and a year later similar paintings are being sold for $1.2 million? You now owe $200,000 in taxes.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT thejessiekirk@ohai.social

                        I don't care if the homeless person we house or the refugee person we welcome is a "good investment".

                        Humanity is not a business.

                        I just want as many HUMAN BEINGS to be warm, happy, safe and healthy as possible.

                        Wrap that up in whatever political affilliation you care too, it's how we should all feel.

                        Geeze, what is wrong with us??

                        bfordham@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bfordham@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bfordham@infosec.exchange
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #16

                        @thejessiekirk Absolutely, 100%

                        Even in cases of, "This person has committed Crime X and we are deporting them" they should be treated with dignity and respect.

                        Jesus even went so far to say how you treat prisoners is directly related to how you treat him.

                        Caring for people shouldn't determine political affiliation. Healthcare shouldn't be a profit generator.

                        It's all so messed up

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper