Them: if you set aside all the ethical concerns…

[petrillic@hachyderm.io]

Them: if you set aside all the ethical concerns…

Me: this is what evil is. This is how evil talks.

[gloriouscow@oldbytes.space]

@petrillic

my friend that is most people at the grocery store

[jargoggles@kolektiva.social]

@gloriouscow @petrillic
The worst kind of evil is the banal kind.

[0f4d0335@infosec.exchange]

@petrillic sounds like a conversation starter at fellowship hour after church

[petrillic@hachyderm.io]

@0f4d0335 is that before or after I spontaneously combust for setting fot in a church?

[0f4d0335@infosec.exchange]

@petrillic i think that doesn't happen only in episcopalian churches

[3fingers@blorbo.social]

@petrillic evil is always a bullshit concept. anyone who uses words like that has serious mental problems.

[azuaron@cyberpunk.lol]

@gloriouscow @petrillic My friend, that's not an argument against what they said.

[gloriouscow@oldbytes.space]

@Azuaron @petrillic

who's arguing

[anyia@lgbtqia.space]

@petrillic My boss, in response to the meeting where a number of us raised a whole lot of ethical concerns around LLMs: "We can't not use it just because of these big picture issues"

Incidentally, I'm looking for a new job.

[tattered@social.vivaldi.net]

@petrillic There are things I don’t like about Emmanuel Levinas (Theology!). However, his response to his WW2 experience was to attempt an “Ethics first” approach to philosophy. This, I think, is admirable; especially when applied to politics.

“Setting aside ethics” is the logic behind class divisions, racism, sexism, gender discrimination, climate denial,…

The pattern is clear. “Ethics first” means respect for others and the world we live in. Those who don’t respect that do not deserve respect in return, as per Popper.

Evil? Perhaps; though the word has supernatural overtones.
Uncivilized, and unacceptable to a civilized society? Certainly.

[lovestha@floss.social]

@petrillic meh, I've enjoyed some conversations that start that way. But if they aren't detailing those ethical concerns then they are expecting people to ignore them all the time and not just in this conversation.

[violetmadder@kolektiva.social]

@3Fingers @petrillic

How about torture, rape, or double-tap bombing hospitals?

If that isn't evil what the fuck is it?

[3fingers@blorbo.social]

@violetmadder @petrillic it's torture, rape, and bombing hospitals, obviously.

[3fingers@blorbo.social]

@violetmadder @petrillic and, it needs to be said - this is such an annoyingly lazy, unsophisticated, ridiculous, cliché response. for hundreds of years (at least), people have been denying the existence of moral truths, and putting forward still-undefeated arguments refuting moralism (Hume's Guillotine, Error Theory, Stirner's observation that religious morality is nothing but the subjective preferences of a being revered as a god, etc.), and every time the nonsensical nature of moralism is brought up, moralists simply fall back on the tired old refrain of pointing to cruelty and calling it evil, insisting "there are things i don't like, therefore evil must exist!"

[roadskater@mastodon.social]

@gloriouscow @petrillic This is the competition for slots in the grocery store parking lot.

[cy@fedicy.us.to]

It's what the news wants you to care about, so you don't focus on improving the life of yourself and people around you, and remain a helpless little obedient worker drone.

CC: @3Fingers@blorbo.social @petrillic@hachyderm.io

[3fingers@blorbo.social]

@cy @petrillic @violetmadder what does this even mean

[cy@fedicy.us.to]

It means evil is almost always a bullshit concept.

CC: @petrillic@hachyderm.io @violetmadder@kolektiva.social

[undowell@mastodon.social]

@petrillic
Me: If you set aside all the ethical concerns, it is still in my interest to live in an country that assists the poor, people with kids, the elderly ..., a country that provides good health care for it's population and social insurance. Because I, egoistically, want to live in a safe country surrounded by happy people.