Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
58 Indlæg 42 Posters 99 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • internetarchive@mastodon.archive.orgI internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

    We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

    The short answer: page by page, by hand.

    You may remember our viral 2021 video of Eliza Zhang scanning a book. That's still how we do it.

    Meet Eliza, and learn how we scan books: https://blog.archive.org/2021/02/09/meet-eliza-zhang-book-scanner-and-viral-video-star/

    nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #30

    @internetarchive Oh wow. That's a pretty neat scanner. And I find it impossible to believe it's more efficient to rip books apart when a thing like this exists... They just didn't care enough to look.

    marcel@waldvogel.familyM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • internetarchive@mastodon.archive.orgI internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

      We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

      The short answer: page by page, by hand.

      You may remember our viral 2021 video of Eliza Zhang scanning a book. That's still how we do it.

      Meet Eliza, and learn how we scan books: https://blog.archive.org/2021/02/09/meet-eliza-zhang-book-scanner-and-viral-video-star/

      rainer@socialbc.caR This user is from outside of this forum
      rainer@socialbc.caR This user is from outside of this forum
      rainer@socialbc.ca
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #31

      @internetarchive the patience of an absolute saint!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • internetarchive@mastodon.archive.orgI internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

        We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

        The short answer: page by page, by hand.

        You may remember our viral 2021 video of Eliza Zhang scanning a book. That's still how we do it.

        Meet Eliza, and learn how we scan books: https://blog.archive.org/2021/02/09/meet-eliza-zhang-book-scanner-and-viral-video-star/

        cornelia@plasmatrap.comC This user is from outside of this forum
        cornelia@plasmatrap.comC This user is from outside of this forum
        cornelia@plasmatrap.com
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #32

        @internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org so cool

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • internetarchive@mastodon.archive.orgI internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

          We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

          The short answer: page by page, by hand.

          You may remember our viral 2021 video of Eliza Zhang scanning a book. That's still how we do it.

          Meet Eliza, and learn how we scan books: https://blog.archive.org/2021/02/09/meet-eliza-zhang-book-scanner-and-viral-video-star/

          joscelyntransient@chaosfem.twJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joscelyntransient@chaosfem.twJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joscelyntransient@chaosfem.tw
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #33

          @internetarchive as someone who has had to scan books many times in grad school…that machine is beautiful and I am immensely envious I never got to use one

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • internetarchive@mastodon.archive.orgI internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

            We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

            The short answer: page by page, by hand.

            You may remember our viral 2021 video of Eliza Zhang scanning a book. That's still how we do it.

            Meet Eliza, and learn how we scan books: https://blog.archive.org/2021/02/09/meet-eliza-zhang-book-scanner-and-viral-video-star/

            utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
            utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
            utf_7@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #34

            @internetarchive

            weird, that there is no destructive way to scan automatically

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

              @internetarchive

              Amazing work but please please please stop using MRC in PDFs.

              hammerwell@troet.cafeH This user is from outside of this forum
              hammerwell@troet.cafeH This user is from outside of this forum
              hammerwell@troet.cafe
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #35

              @gloriouscow @internetarchive Whats MRC? Shouldn't those pdf be in pdf/A? Preferably in pfd/A-2a.

              gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • hammerwell@troet.cafeH hammerwell@troet.cafe

                @gloriouscow @internetarchive Whats MRC? Shouldn't those pdf be in pdf/A? Preferably in pfd/A-2a.

                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #36

                @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                MRC is a compression technique ("Mixed Raster Content").

                It basically lifts the text off a graphic onto its own layer, stores it as 1bpp which can be compressed as such, then the underlying graphic, now complete with text-shaped holes in it, can then be compressed with jpeg or something.

                the problem is whatever workflow IA uses to do this dials compression to all the way to maximum which results in 1bpp text over a smeary, unreadable mess

                gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                  @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                  MRC is a compression technique ("Mixed Raster Content").

                  It basically lifts the text off a graphic onto its own layer, stores it as 1bpp which can be compressed as such, then the underlying graphic, now complete with text-shaped holes in it, can then be compressed with jpeg or something.

                  the problem is whatever workflow IA uses to do this dials compression to all the way to maximum which results in 1bpp text over a smeary, unreadable mess

                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #37

                  @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                  here's an actual example.

                  the left is from a Google Books scan. The right is from IA:

                  imo this severely undermines IA's mission to preserve our history and there's a metric shit ton of content on IA that unfortunately probably needs to be reprocessed if not rescanned.

                  gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                    @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                    here's an actual example.

                    the left is from a Google Books scan. The right is from IA:

                    imo this severely undermines IA's mission to preserve our history and there's a metric shit ton of content on IA that unfortunately probably needs to be reprocessed if not rescanned.

                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #38

                    @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                    notice that the "D" in "dealer" has become an O because MRC has the "Xerox Bug"

                    https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are_switching_written_numbers_when_scanning

                    gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                      @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                      notice that the "D" in "dealer" has become an O because MRC has the "Xerox Bug"

                      https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are_switching_written_numbers_when_scanning

                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #39

                      @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                      so not only are the graphics ruined, but the text is ruined too. not a great situation.

                      hammerwell@troet.cafeH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                        @Hammerwell @internetarchive

                        so not only are the graphics ruined, but the text is ruined too. not a great situation.

                        hammerwell@troet.cafeH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hammerwell@troet.cafeH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hammerwell@troet.cafe
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #40

                        @gloriouscow @internetarchive Thanks. OCR should only be used as invisible 2nd layer. pdf/A shouldn't allow this. Version 1 had recognition errors which were corrected in v2. 3 and 4 allow for extra content, which is not advisable since it's unclear if it's accessible in the future. 2a should be choosen because of the accessibility requirement. Screen readers can read them properly.

                        textfiles@mastodon.archive.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • thorsted@digipres.clubT thorsted@digipres.club

                          @gloriouscow @internetarchive I second this request.

                          jj@types.plJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jj@types.plJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jj@types.pl
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #41

                          @Thorsted @gloriouscow @internetarchive i am of a mixed opinion here. MRC is good for archival but definitely sucks for the end user. it would be very nice if user-facing PDFs could be just the mask + get jbig2ified + get an OCR layer... but perhaps that is a task better suited for shadow libraries

                          gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jj@types.plJ jj@types.pl

                            @Thorsted @gloriouscow @internetarchive i am of a mixed opinion here. MRC is good for archival but definitely sucks for the end user. it would be very nice if user-facing PDFs could be just the mask + get jbig2ified + get an OCR layer... but perhaps that is a task better suited for shadow libraries

                            gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #42

                            @jj @Thorsted @internetarchive see my posts later. It sucks for archival too.

                            jj@types.plJ thorsted@digipres.clubT 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                              @jj @Thorsted @internetarchive see my posts later. It sucks for archival too.

                              jj@types.plJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jj@types.plJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jj@types.pl
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #43

                              @gloriouscow @Thorsted @internetarchive i saw them, yeah -- this is not fundamental to MRC, no? just the internet archive's particular use of it. were compression not at max it should be ok

                              thorsted@digipres.clubT gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

                                @jj @Thorsted @internetarchive see my posts later. It sucks for archival too.

                                thorsted@digipres.clubT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thorsted@digipres.clubT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thorsted@digipres.club
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #44

                                @gloriouscow @jj @internetarchive agreed. Terrible for archiving.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social

                                  @internetarchive Oh wow. That's a pretty neat scanner. And I find it impossible to believe it's more efficient to rip books apart when a thing like this exists... They just didn't care enough to look.

                                  marcel@waldvogel.familyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  marcel@waldvogel.familyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  marcel@waldvogel.family
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #45

                                  @nazokiyoubinbou @internetarchive
                                  The other process is several times faster and tries to keep copyright lawyers at bay for some time. Win-win for Amazon etc. …
                                  https://www.404media.co/we-tracked-a-shipment-of-rare-books-it-ended-at-an-amazon-ai-training-facility/

                                  nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jj@types.plJ jj@types.pl

                                    @gloriouscow @Thorsted @internetarchive i saw them, yeah -- this is not fundamental to MRC, no? just the internet archive's particular use of it. were compression not at max it should be ok

                                    thorsted@digipres.clubT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thorsted@digipres.clubT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thorsted@digipres.club
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #46

                                    @jj @gloriouscow @internetarchive my issue is when looking at the metadata there is an excessive amount of images to process.

                                    jj@types.plJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jj@types.plJ jj@types.pl

                                      @gloriouscow @Thorsted @internetarchive i saw them, yeah -- this is not fundamental to MRC, no? just the internet archive's particular use of it. were compression not at max it should be ok

                                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.spaceG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gloriouscow@oldbytes.space
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #47

                                      @jj @Thorsted @internetarchive I just know I've never seen a jpeg change a letter

                                      jj@types.plJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • marcel@waldvogel.familyM marcel@waldvogel.family

                                        @nazokiyoubinbou @internetarchive
                                        The other process is several times faster and tries to keep copyright lawyers at bay for some time. Win-win for Amazon etc. …
                                        https://www.404media.co/we-tracked-a-shipment-of-rare-books-it-ended-at-an-amazon-ai-training-facility/

                                        nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #48

                                        @marcel @internetarchive I think actually ripping pages out takes longer than what I'm seeing here. Unless they have some super exact process to machine cut the books open without cutting out any letters, but what I had heard in the past was they employed people to tear them up and feed the pages in.

                                        I mean just look at that video. Flip, press, flip, press, flip, press. It's fast and accurate.

                                        But yes, they destroy them on purpose, which was... kind of my point. They could shred/etc even if they preserved them. Though I'm not clear why they can't give them to a charity or something (tax break!)

                                        BTW you shared a paywall article. I've already heard about that though and was specifically referring to it as an example, but if I hadn't that wouldn't be a particularly helpful link...

                                        marcel@waldvogel.familyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • internetarchive@mastodon.archive.orgI internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

                                          We've been getting a lot of questions about how the Internet Archive digitizes books.

                                          The short answer: page by page, by hand.

                                          You may remember our viral 2021 video of Eliza Zhang scanning a book. That's still how we do it.

                                          Meet Eliza, and learn how we scan books: https://blog.archive.org/2021/02/09/meet-eliza-zhang-book-scanner-and-viral-video-star/

                                          deathkitten@firetribe.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          deathkitten@firetribe.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          deathkitten@firetribe.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #49

                                          @internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org As someone who used to work in a print shop, and has done my share scanning stuff from books, I desperately wish we'd had a scanner like that for the book copy jobs I did. Laying books open on a flatbed scanner is so tedious, and the repetitive motion of having to pick up the book to turn the page between each scan is exhausting. This would still be tedious, but a little easier only having to turn the page.

                                          You can tell this machine was designed by someone with care for both the book and the operator.

                                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper