Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”Me: “Yup.”Student: “How did he get that much money?”Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash.

Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”Me: “Yup.”Student: “How did he get that much money?”Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
79 Indlæg 55 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • nswigger@mstdn.partyN nswigger@mstdn.party

    Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
    Me: “Yup.”
    Student: “How did he get that much money?”
    Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
    Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
    Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

    The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

    zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zbrando@social.vivaldi.netZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zbrando@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #19

    @nswigger You forgot the rich people borrow money against those stocks. And that a company can pay the owner bonuses.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

      @nswigger @failedLyndonLaRouchite

      3) The AI bubble crashes the US economy so badly that there's hyperinflation on the US dollar and $3.4 T is roughly the cost of a small loaf of bread in 2040.

      I do wonder if this is the goal for a load of the datacenter investors: buying a load of land and so on as fixed-interest bond debt and pushing inflation up so much that inflation is much higher than the interest rate so that the debt evaporates.

      feld@friedcheese.usF This user is from outside of this forum
      feld@friedcheese.usF This user is from outside of this forum
      feld@friedcheese.us
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #20
      @david_chisnall @nswigger @failedLyndonLaRouchite yes inflating the debt away is quite a strategy but it's a real one
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • huntingdon@mstdn.socialH huntingdon@mstdn.social

        @nswigger

        "No one at the Economist Can Figure Out Why" so many people hate unregulated capitalism.

        maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        maddiem4@raphus.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #21

        @huntingdon @nswigger as I've gotten older and been exposed to more of the world, it's become impossible to see economists as anything more than bootlickers for whichever powerful status quo needs a pseudoscientific veneer of validation this decade (the concept of "revealed preferences" is about as damning for their field as "oppositional defiant disorder" is for psychiatry).

        Unfortunately, you can't really say that kind of thing at an average cocktail party without sounding like one of those people who drinks their own urine and thinks 5G puts a chip in your head. But we're slowly getting to a place of deserved skepticism for fields that have long played fast and loose with academic rigor.

        Anyways, the Economist is a hilarious example of exactly the material you'd expect, from people who would name themselves "the Economist" without a hint of self-awareness or irony.

        ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA lauerhahn@sfba.socialL dirtside@phpc.socialD berniethewordsmith@neopaquita.esB dpflug@hachyderm.ioD 6 Replies Last reply
        0
        • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

          @huntingdon @nswigger as I've gotten older and been exposed to more of the world, it's become impossible to see economists as anything more than bootlickers for whichever powerful status quo needs a pseudoscientific veneer of validation this decade (the concept of "revealed preferences" is about as damning for their field as "oppositional defiant disorder" is for psychiatry).

          Unfortunately, you can't really say that kind of thing at an average cocktail party without sounding like one of those people who drinks their own urine and thinks 5G puts a chip in your head. But we're slowly getting to a place of deserved skepticism for fields that have long played fast and loose with academic rigor.

          Anyways, the Economist is a hilarious example of exactly the material you'd expect, from people who would name themselves "the Economist" without a hint of self-awareness or irony.

          ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA This user is from outside of this forum
          ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA This user is from outside of this forum
          ansuz@gts.cryptography.dog
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #22

          @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger we do occasionally get economists like Elinor Ostrom who do cool things like formalize how to prevent abuse of commons. The good ones are exceptionally rare, though.

          maddiem4@raphus.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

            @huntingdon @nswigger as I've gotten older and been exposed to more of the world, it's become impossible to see economists as anything more than bootlickers for whichever powerful status quo needs a pseudoscientific veneer of validation this decade (the concept of "revealed preferences" is about as damning for their field as "oppositional defiant disorder" is for psychiatry).

            Unfortunately, you can't really say that kind of thing at an average cocktail party without sounding like one of those people who drinks their own urine and thinks 5G puts a chip in your head. But we're slowly getting to a place of deserved skepticism for fields that have long played fast and loose with academic rigor.

            Anyways, the Economist is a hilarious example of exactly the material you'd expect, from people who would name themselves "the Economist" without a hint of self-awareness or irony.

            lauerhahn@sfba.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lauerhahn@sfba.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lauerhahn@sfba.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #23

            @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger I still remember taking Econ 101 in college and being shocked by 1) how easy it was and 2) how obviously fake (disconnected from reality) the models were.

            maddiem4@raphus.socialM eowyn@pouet.chapril.orgE 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • nswigger@mstdn.partyN nswigger@mstdn.party

              Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
              Me: “Yup.”
              Student: “How did he get that much money?”
              Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
              Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
              Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

              The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

              slesa@social.saarlandS This user is from outside of this forum
              slesa@social.saarlandS This user is from outside of this forum
              slesa@social.saarland
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #24

              @nswigger Not only Gen Z...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lauerhahn@sfba.socialL lauerhahn@sfba.social

                @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger I still remember taking Econ 101 in college and being shocked by 1) how easy it was and 2) how obviously fake (disconnected from reality) the models were.

                maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                maddiem4@raphus.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #25

                @lauerhahn @huntingdon @nswigger Exactly. Spherical cows are totally fine for physics, most of the time, but dangerously misleading if you try to model like that for biology or veterinary science. The more I've learned about Econ, the more it's felt like the latter.

                steve@social.coopS bjb@fosstodon.orgB 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA ansuz@gts.cryptography.dog

                  @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger we do occasionally get economists like Elinor Ostrom who do cool things like formalize how to prevent abuse of commons. The good ones are exceptionally rare, though.

                  maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  maddiem4@raphus.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #26

                  @ansuz @huntingdon @nswigger I should do some research on her! She sounds fascinating.

                  ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nswigger@mstdn.partyN nswigger@mstdn.party

                    Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
                    Me: “Yup.”
                    Student: “How did he get that much money?”
                    Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
                    Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
                    Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

                    The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

                    jizzeletbass@kolektiva.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jizzeletbass@kolektiva.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jizzeletbass@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #27

                    @nswigger Would you take Elder Millennial can't understand #NASDAQ Mega-cap valuation and expedited #IPO of $1.75 trillion when the company has had a negative net revenue in the billions of dollars for 2 of the last 3 years (Page 21).
                    2025 it lost $4.9 Billion and in 2023 they lost $4.6 Billion

                    Source:
                    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

                      @huntingdon @nswigger as I've gotten older and been exposed to more of the world, it's become impossible to see economists as anything more than bootlickers for whichever powerful status quo needs a pseudoscientific veneer of validation this decade (the concept of "revealed preferences" is about as damning for their field as "oppositional defiant disorder" is for psychiatry).

                      Unfortunately, you can't really say that kind of thing at an average cocktail party without sounding like one of those people who drinks their own urine and thinks 5G puts a chip in your head. But we're slowly getting to a place of deserved skepticism for fields that have long played fast and loose with academic rigor.

                      Anyways, the Economist is a hilarious example of exactly the material you'd expect, from people who would name themselves "the Economist" without a hint of self-awareness or irony.

                      dirtside@phpc.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dirtside@phpc.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dirtside@phpc.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #28

                      @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger I think it's critical to follow the money. Almost all the pro-oligarchy economists are, surprise, paid by oligarchs (directly or indirectly). So the ideas they produce become entirely unsurprising.

                      maddiem4@raphus.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

                        @lauerhahn @huntingdon @nswigger Exactly. Spherical cows are totally fine for physics, most of the time, but dangerously misleading if you try to model like that for biology or veterinary science. The more I've learned about Econ, the more it's felt like the latter.

                        steve@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                        steve@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
                        steve@social.coop
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #29

                        @MaddieM4 @lauerhahn @huntingdon @nswigger Given his pervasive presence in the headlines, and the disconnect between his performance as a businessman and his ever-expanding wealth, I'm forced to conclude that Elon Musk is a spherical cow.

                        maddiem4@raphus.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dirtside@phpc.socialD dirtside@phpc.social

                          @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger I think it's critical to follow the money. Almost all the pro-oligarchy economists are, surprise, paid by oligarchs (directly or indirectly). So the ideas they produce become entirely unsurprising.

                          maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maddiem4@raphus.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #30

                          @dirtside @huntingdon @nswigger Indeed. And unfortunately, there's very little path to supporting yourself financially as an economist *other than* the pro-oligarchy path.

                          It's very much like the dilemma of scientists who are paid to do studies by Big Agriculture - employers who will throw out any result that doesn't align with "a little Roundup ingestion never hurt anybody." Food science is interesting, and it's really important! We need to be making enough food for everyone, and for that food to be nutritious and non-harmful. There's so many reasons to study that field and try to get a job in it. It sucks that the invisible hand is reticent to pay for food science outside the business interest domain.

                          Economics is in a similar position but with even *less* opportunity for non-sycophantic roles.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • steve@social.coopS steve@social.coop

                            @MaddieM4 @lauerhahn @huntingdon @nswigger Given his pervasive presence in the headlines, and the disconnect between his performance as a businessman and his ever-expanding wealth, I'm forced to conclude that Elon Musk is a spherical cow.

                            maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            maddiem4@raphus.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #31

                            @Steve @lauerhahn @huntingdon @nswigger That _would_ explain where he gets all the methane for the portable gas generators at his AI datacenters, wouldn't it...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

                              @ansuz @huntingdon @nswigger I should do some research on her! She sounds fascinating.

                              ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA This user is from outside of this forum
                              ansuz@gts.cryptography.dogA This user is from outside of this forum
                              ansuz@gts.cryptography.dog
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #32

                              @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger I'm only familiar with her work at a very high level, but I'd definitely like to find time to read her research directly

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • rupert@mastodon.nzR rupert@mastodon.nz

                                @nswigger nitpick: Elon Musk is the only billionaire. Everyone else claiming to be a billionaire is only a milliardaire.
                                I thought this battle was lost in the 1980s, but recent self-immolation by the country that foisted the incorrect definition of billion on the rest of us has encouraged me to revive it.

                                thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thetenuousorder@meow.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thetenuousorder@meow.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #33

                                @rupert @nswigger ok boomer

                                rupert@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nswigger@mstdn.partyN nswigger@mstdn.party

                                  Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
                                  Me: “Yup.”
                                  Student: “How did he get that much money?”
                                  Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
                                  Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
                                  Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

                                  The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

                                  disorderlyf@todon.euD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  disorderlyf@todon.euD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  disorderlyf@todon.eu
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #34

                                  @nswigger "How did he get that much money?" by basically being a parasite on the rest of the S&P 500

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

                                    @huntingdon @nswigger as I've gotten older and been exposed to more of the world, it's become impossible to see economists as anything more than bootlickers for whichever powerful status quo needs a pseudoscientific veneer of validation this decade (the concept of "revealed preferences" is about as damning for their field as "oppositional defiant disorder" is for psychiatry).

                                    Unfortunately, you can't really say that kind of thing at an average cocktail party without sounding like one of those people who drinks their own urine and thinks 5G puts a chip in your head. But we're slowly getting to a place of deserved skepticism for fields that have long played fast and loose with academic rigor.

                                    Anyways, the Economist is a hilarious example of exactly the material you'd expect, from people who would name themselves "the Economist" without a hint of self-awareness or irony.

                                    berniethewordsmith@neopaquita.esB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    berniethewordsmith@neopaquita.esB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    berniethewordsmith@neopaquita.es
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #35

                                    @MaddieM4 @huntingdon @nswigger You are even kinder than I would be at that cocktail party, because I would be mentioning that reading tea leaves has more science than some economic theories

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • thetenuousorder@meow.socialT thetenuousorder@meow.social

                                      @rupert @nswigger ok boomer

                                      rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rupert@mastodon.nz
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #36

                                      @TheTenuousOrder @nswigger Elder GenXer, ackchewally.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • nswigger@mstdn.partyN nswigger@mstdn.party

                                        Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
                                        Me: “Yup.”
                                        Student: “How did he get that much money?”
                                        Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
                                        Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
                                        Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

                                        The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

                                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #37

                                        @nswigger IMHO all profits and assets that one can get a loan against or use as collateral should be taxed like wagework income, if not higher!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nswigger@mstdn.partyN nswigger@mstdn.party

                                          Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
                                          Me: “Yup.”
                                          Student: “How did he get that much money?”
                                          Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
                                          Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
                                          Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

                                          The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

                                          bjb@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bjb@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          bjb@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #38

                                          @nswigger

                                          Maybe the student can understand why I call it the "greater fool market" instead of the "stock market".

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper