every ai guy says "i carefully reviewed everything!" but then u actually read the code and it's dogshit

[lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@shuppy @jacqueline it's the reason why all this is temporary.

but it really makes you doubt yourself. strangely.

(i just hope we don't take from this that we should never doubt ourselves, like the G.I. generation in the 70's who sent boomers to hell to "teach them a lesson")

[sortius@beige.party]

@jacqueline I want them to feel bad

[dysfun@social.treehouse.systems]

@jacqueline should have said impressive, they are genuinely impressive. in their way. https://social.treehouse.systems/@dysfun/116669622500374568

[emma@orbital.horse]

@shuppy @jacqueline

[nando161@partyon.xyz]

@jacqueline

[jacqueline@chaos.social]

@rancoisse idk he seems satisfied with the arrangement

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@jacqueline definition of good skewed by continious brainrot

[starkrg@myside-yourside.net]

@jacqueline Because by "I" they mean "the LLM," and by "carefully reviewed everything" they mean "processed the code as an input and produced an output that reinforced my assumption for how everything inside the impenetrable and unobservable black box is working."

[jacqueline@chaos.social]

@StarkRG well u see i opened the diff up in the github pr viewer, and i scrolled through it slowly, and i read most of it. and it looked fine to me. and i consider myself a pretty thorough reviewer. so yeah, i reviewed it thoroughly.

[lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me]

@jacqueline Ass Input, Shit Output

[lolitechengineer@loli.church]

@lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me @jacqueline@chaos.social but I told it not to make any mistakes!