Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Submitted a potentially high impact paper to Nature Climate Change.

Submitted a potentially high impact paper to Nature Climate Change.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
academicchatter
4 Indlæg 2 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    ruth_mottram@fediscience.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Submitted a potentially high impact paper to Nature Climate Change. They have rejected and suggested NPJ atmospheric science.
    Frankly, I don't want to spend enormous amounts of money at Springer, I was already ambivalent about NCC. So where next? I'm thinking maybe the Cryosphere? But perhaps we should give Science or PNAS a go? (Also expensive).
    Scientific publishing is so broken, too many publications but we all rely on publishing for our careers and future grants. (And we need this one to be published, it's actually quite important).

    #academicchatter

    ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR ruth_mottram@fediscience.org

      Submitted a potentially high impact paper to Nature Climate Change. They have rejected and suggested NPJ atmospheric science.
      Frankly, I don't want to spend enormous amounts of money at Springer, I was already ambivalent about NCC. So where next? I'm thinking maybe the Cryosphere? But perhaps we should give Science or PNAS a go? (Also expensive).
      Scientific publishing is so broken, too many publications but we all rely on publishing for our careers and future grants. (And we need this one to be published, it's actually quite important).

      #academicchatter

      ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
      ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
      ruth_mottram@fediscience.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      (I will post a preprint as soon as it has been accepted for review, at this stage we haven't even got over the editor's desk.)

      ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR ruth_mottram@fediscience.org

        (I will post a preprint as soon as it has been accepted for review, at this stage we haven't even got over the editor's desk.)

        ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
        ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
        ruth_mottram@fediscience.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        That's the other problem with academic publishing, it takes soooooo long. I genuinely believe preprint servers are where the exciting stuff is now, but it can be hard to find and keeping up with published literature alone is almost impossible. But when it takes maybe 2 years to come through the process...
        (And I'm an editor for the Cryosphere - I realise I'm often the road block- but it also has to be squeezed in around the day job).

        malte@radikal.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ruth_mottram@fediscience.orgR ruth_mottram@fediscience.org

          That's the other problem with academic publishing, it takes soooooo long. I genuinely believe preprint servers are where the exciting stuff is now, but it can be hard to find and keeping up with published literature alone is almost impossible. But when it takes maybe 2 years to come through the process...
          (And I'm an editor for the Cryosphere - I realise I'm often the road block- but it also has to be squeezed in around the day job).

          malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          malte@radikal.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @Ruth_Mottram It's so sad that researchers have to deal with this rat race. Where would you place a newer kind of journal like PLOS One in this landscape? Making things better or worse? (Or both, which is also possible)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Svar
          • Svar som emne
          Login for at svare
          • Ældste til nyeste
          • Nyeste til ældste
          • Most Votes


          • Log ind

          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          Graciously hosted by data.coop
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Hjem
          • Seneste
          • Etiketter
          • Populære
          • Verden
          • Bruger
          • Grupper