Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Ed Zitron's a fantastic journalist, capable of turning a close read of AI companies' balance-sheets into an incandescent, exquisitely informed, eye-wateringly profane rant:

Ed Zitron's a fantastic journalist, capable of turning a close read of AI companies' balance-sheets into an incandescent, exquisitely informed, eye-wateringly profane rant:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
45 Indlæg 6 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    Machines work faster and longer than humans, and the faster and harder a human can be made to work, the closer the firm can come to the ideal of paying zero for its inputs.

    A reverse centaur works for a machine that is set to run at the absolute limit of its human peripheral's capability and endurance. A reverse centaur is expected to produce with the mechanical regularity of a machine, catching every mistake the machine makes.

    37/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.fr
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #36

    A reverse centaur is the machine's accountability sink and moral crumple-zone:

    https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/260

    AI is a normal technology, just another set of automation tools that have some uses for some users. The thing that makes AI signify "go fuck yourself" isn't some intrinsic factor of large language models or transformers. It's the capitalist mode of automation, increasing quantity at the expense of quality.

    38/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      A reverse centaur is the machine's accountability sink and moral crumple-zone:

      https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/260

      AI is a normal technology, just another set of automation tools that have some uses for some users. The thing that makes AI signify "go fuck yourself" isn't some intrinsic factor of large language models or transformers. It's the capitalist mode of automation, increasing quantity at the expense of quality.

      38/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #37

      Automation doesn't *have* to be a way to reduce expectations in the hopes of selling worse things for more money - but without some form of external constraint (unions, regulation, competition), that is inevitably how companies will wield *any* automation, including and especially AI.

      eof/

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        Normally the "digital divide" refers to *access* to technology, but as access becomes less and less of an issue, the real divide is between people who know how to defend themselves from the cruel indifference of technology designers and people who are helpless before their enshittificatory gambits.

        5/

        kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
        kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
        kkarhan@infosec.space
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #38

        @pluralistic thus I coined the term "#TechLiteracy" (or lack thereof as "#TechIlliteracy").

        • As this is a more fitting term to differenciate between "us" #TechLiterates (who know how to setup some lightweight #Linux distro and make it work (not just for us bot others) and those who believe the #Enshittification, #bloat and crap is "a fact of life" (aka. "#TechIlliterates")…
          • Just like #literacy enables people to learn, interact and communicate, the same applies to using #technology and #media (see "#MediaLiteracy")…

        Thus I see it as both moral and social duty to spread "Tech-Literacy" among society because decades of #illiteracy in #tech are now paying dividends and #Cyberfascists actively work on sabotaging and destroying #HumanRights and #CivilRights under #FalsePretenses lile "#YouthProtection" (see "#AgeVerification")…

        lemgandi@mastodon.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          Zitron's stunt stuck with me because it's so simple and so apt. Every tech designer should be forced to use a stock configuration Acer Aspire 1 for a minimum of three hours/day, just as every aviation CEO should be required to fly basic coach at least one out of three flights (and one of two long-haul flights).

          6/

          kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
          kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
          kkarhan@infosec.space
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #39

          @pluralistic IMHO politicans should be forced to exclusively use #PublicTransport 2nd if not 3rd class so they get to "#TouchGrass" (or rather "#TouchBase" with their constituents).

          Same with #tech, really…

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            To that, I will add: every news executive should be forced to consume the news in a stock browser with no adblock, no accessibility plugins, no Reader View, none of the add-ons that make reading the web bearable:

            https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/07/reader-mode/#personal-disenshittification

            But in all honesty, I fear this would not make much of a difference, because I suspect that the people who oversee the design of modern news sites *don't care about the news at all*.

            7/

            kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
            kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
            kkarhan@infosec.space
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #40

            @pluralistic OFC they don't!

            And even then they too are just as #TechIlliterate and #MediaIlliterate as their customers!
            https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/116212547656181822

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kkarhan@infosec.spaceK kkarhan@infosec.space

              @pluralistic thus I coined the term "#TechLiteracy" (or lack thereof as "#TechIlliteracy").

              • As this is a more fitting term to differenciate between "us" #TechLiterates (who know how to setup some lightweight #Linux distro and make it work (not just for us bot others) and those who believe the #Enshittification, #bloat and crap is "a fact of life" (aka. "#TechIlliterates")…
                • Just like #literacy enables people to learn, interact and communicate, the same applies to using #technology and #media (see "#MediaLiteracy")…

              Thus I see it as both moral and social duty to spread "Tech-Literacy" among society because decades of #illiteracy in #tech are now paying dividends and #Cyberfascists actively work on sabotaging and destroying #HumanRights and #CivilRights under #FalsePretenses lile "#YouthProtection" (see "#AgeVerification")…

              lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lemgandi@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #41

              @kkarhan @pluralistic

              First step in Tech Literacy: use a password manager. Use A Password Manager. USE A PAASWORD MANAGER.

              kkarhan@infosec.spaceK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lemgandi@mastodon.socialL lemgandi@mastodon.social

                @kkarhan @pluralistic

                First step in Tech Literacy: use a password manager. Use A Password Manager. USE A PAASWORD MANAGER.

                kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                kkarhan@infosec.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #42

                @lemgandi @pluralistic OFC!

                And then go to a @cryptoparty@mastodon.earth / @cryptoparty@chaos.social / #CryptoParty and learn the basics on how to get started with @tails_live / @tails / #Tails and @torproject / #TorBrowser and all the other things…

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  Machines work faster and longer than humans, and the faster and harder a human can be made to work, the closer the firm can come to the ideal of paying zero for its inputs.

                  A reverse centaur works for a machine that is set to run at the absolute limit of its human peripheral's capability and endurance. A reverse centaur is expected to produce with the mechanical regularity of a machine, catching every mistake the machine makes.

                  37/

                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  darkerknight@climatejustice.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #43

                  @pluralistic

                  All that to achieve ... what?

                  Cheaper mass goods for a now dying out human populace that no longer want them, because the machinery that produced the goods so efficiently was alsol killing the very ecological balance that the consumer (human) species needed to be alive on.

                  Stupid of what?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    That's "Ed, the financial sleuth." But Ed has another persona, one we don't get nearly enough of, which I delight in: "Ed the stunt journalist." For example, in 2024, Ed bought Amazon's bestselling laptop, "a $238 Acer Aspire 1 with a four-year-old Celeron N4500 Processor, 4GB of DDR4 RAM, and 128GB of slow eMMC storage" and wrote about the experience of using the internet with this popular, terrible machine:

                    https://www.wheresyoured.at/never-forgive-them/

                    2/

                    elearningtechie@mas.toE This user is from outside of this forum
                    elearningtechie@mas.toE This user is from outside of this forum
                    elearningtechie@mas.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #44

                    @pluralistic "stunt journalist" 🤣
                    Nice!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      Even if you want to write a pastiche in the style of some writer you admire (or want to send up), word choices and sentence structure are only incidental to capturing that writer's style. To reduce "style" to "stylometry" is to commit the cardinal sin of technical analysis: namely, incinerating all the squishy qualitative aspects that can't be readily fed into a model and doing math on the resulting dubious quantitative residue:

                      https://locusmag.com/feature/cory-doctorow-qualia/

                      27/

                      malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      malte@radikal.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #45

                      @pluralistic One my favorite writers on the epistemology of aesthetics, Graham Harman, defines style as precisely that which you *cannot* turn into a protocol of if-then rules (which would make it a parody)

                      #ooo

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper