Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Have you ever used a zipper?

Have you ever used a zipper?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
134 Indlæg 73 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sinvega@mas.toS sinvega@mas.to

    @grimalkina that IS fun! An old school one I think, sure, assuming it's opened up so you can see it (bit of a cheat but), sure, you can probably see that the springs spring back when you push them, and the wheels roll so it doesn't scrape or get stuck... and maybe that pressing that button pushes down a thing that's holding the spring back...

    but that's like 20 concepts away from what it's for and how it actually functions, let alone how you'd make one. And even that depends on "wheel" and "spring", which you might only understand that "this spins / this pushes", not how or why, certainly not on a theoretical physics level

    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grimalkina@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #84

    @sinvega he talks about how you might derive functional rules too (eg that identical items in a grocery store should always be the same price every time you ring them up) given the right components and observations!

    sinvega@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

      @grimalkina we realize that sharing this misses the point of your thread 🙂 it's just that hardly anybody ever does ask and we wanted to share the image.......

      grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grimalkina@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #85

      @ireneista please!! It's the best kind of reply! I love how many kinds of knowledge and teaching threads like this elicit 🙂

      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

        @sinvega he talks about how you might derive functional rules too (eg that identical items in a grocery store should always be the same price every time you ring them up) given the right components and observations!

        sinvega@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
        sinvega@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
        sinvega@mas.to
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #86

        @grimalkina any time I've been in a job interview, for basically any job, if they do the "what's most important / what does this job need" question, I said "empathy". And this is empathy to me! You're conceiving of another person, that they might want and intend things, independently but potentially just as you would

        At heart I suppose I think of empathy as "why?", and one of many reasons the idea of "emotional vs logical" is bollocks

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

          @ireneista please!! It's the best kind of reply! I love how many kinds of knowledge and teaching threads like this elicit 🙂

          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #87

          @grimalkina oh, well, good! yeah that particular illustration was super helpful to us as kids, and it's not a topic that is taught nearly as widely to children anymore, so a while back we decided we wanted to have it handy and went and found a scan

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

            in re zippers: been studying interwar sewing books, especially 1920s, exactly because they DO NOT deal with zippers. they weren't cheap until after WW2.

            the zippered bomber jackets of WW1 were expensive to make at home. it’s why they became a status symbol among the moneyed classes.

            on the other hand, after WW2 they were cheap army surplus. hence the 1950s poverty coda of the leather jacket, tshirt & jeans ―which, as cheap surplus clothes, didn't have zippers yet.

            so zippers…

            @grimalkina

            blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            blogdiva@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #88

            so zippers are really interesting as something people take for granted in clothes but they weren't always there.

            it’s why i wanted to study the logic of crafting pants in a zipperless world.

            well, for starters, pants aren’t trousers because pants are held up by a belt whereas trousers are held up by a fly.

            a zipperless world forces you to fit the pants with just enough ease to keep the pants up without a belt or with an open fly.

            it’s technique over tech. /🧵

            @grimalkina

            ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

              Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

              The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

              But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

              ted@social.gould.cxT This user is from outside of this forum
              ted@social.gould.cxT This user is from outside of this forum
              ted@social.gould.cx
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #89

              @grimalkina there was an article I read on this long ago that I can no longer find that talked about how your grandma's recipes are simple, but you can't make them because of the context she left out. She was an expert and wrote down the details she needed to remember the recipe, but not enough that a novice could make it. Then it compared the differences in what would need to be said for the levels of expertise. Really made it hit home for me. Wish I could find the article again.

              n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

                The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

                But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #90

                @grimalkina no, right, it's not possible to learn everything along with how to explain it, not all that useful to, shouldn't be the goal, shouldn't be a thing people have to do to solve social problems, and all that

                nonetheless, it's fun and we've spent our whole life trying ><

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                  Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

                  The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

                  But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

                  screwturn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  screwturn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  screwturn@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #91

                  @grimalkina
                  Delightful thread, thank you!

                  I could explain all of the examples you gave, but for many years I was an apprentice and then an instrument technician, so got a ton of insight into how stuff works - BUT dig a little deeper and there are always more layers and interconnected systems that are familiar by mysterious

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

                    @grimalkina As a result of this thread I went on a binge learning about the history of zipper design.

                    I am now using graphite pencils to properly lubricate all of my zippers, thank you very much.

                    dgfitch@kolektiva.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dgfitch@kolektiva.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dgfitch@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #92

                    @sidereal @grimalkina I learned this from the luthier in my neighborhood: you can put some graphite in the little divots in the nut of a stringed instrument (the part that sticks up as the "zeroth" fret) and that makes tuning less "sticky" (strings much less likely to get stuck and then jump out of tune unexpectedly)

                    thanks for making me think about metacognition today!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                      In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

                      - how a sewing machine works
                      - how a can opener works
                      - how a flush toilet operates
                      - how the heart pumps blood
                      - how piano keys make sound

                      Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
                      - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
                      - how a transistor works

                      *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

                      shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      shapr@recurse.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #93

                      @grimalkina I think I can say yes to all of these, but I'll check by writing down my answers before finding the genuine answers!

                      I very much enjoy explaining these sorts of things to people, but I have met very few who want to hear my explanations!

                      Thus I suspect most humans do not know how those things work, not at all.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                        Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                        Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                        anke@social.scribblers.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                        anke@social.scribblers.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                        anke@social.scribblers.club
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #94

                        @grimalkina I think I could, but not because I used them often, bug because I was gifted a book that explained a lot of different technologies using mammoths.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ricci@discuss.systemsR ricci@discuss.systems

                          @jawnsy @grimalkina It's okay, Jonathan, I can't explain where you are either

                          jawnsy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jawnsy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jawnsy@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #95

                          @ricci @grimalkina Questions that I've spent my life searching to answer:

                          Who am I?
                          What am I?
                          Where am I?
                          When am I?
                          Why am I?
                          How am I?

                          I have gone to search for myself. If you should arrive before I do, please wait for me.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • oisin@mastodon.ieO oisin@mastodon.ie

                            @grimalkina I love this kind of stuff! I cannot explain how an aqualung regulator works but I know the rest. My special interest is in collecting facts that are entirely irrelevant to my life 😀

                            philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            philsalkie@mindly.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #96

                            @oisin @grimalkina

                            SCUBA regulator is absurdly simple, which is good because complex things fail in complex ways, and complex failures underwater all lead inexorably to the same outcome.

                            There's a rubber diaphragm with one side facing the part that goes in your mouth (mouthpiece). The mouthpiece has some one-way valves so when you exhale, air goes out to the water, but when you inhale, water doesn't come in.

                            That rubber diaphragm will, thus, move inward when you inhale. The diaphragm is attached to a lever on the other side, so when you breathe in, the lever moves. The other end of the lever is hooked to a tiny needle valve, which lets air from the feed hose into the breathing chamber of the mouthpiece. When you stop inhaling, the pressure on the inside and outside of the diaphragm equalizes, it moves back to the "flat" position, and the needle valve closes. Any overpressure just goes out the vents to the water - sometimes that needle valve will stick and you get way more air than you want, but it's not harmful to you (aside from wasting breathable air and shortening the duration of your dive) because it just rushes out the vents.

                            philsalkie@mindly.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • philsalkie@mindly.socialP philsalkie@mindly.social

                              @oisin @grimalkina

                              SCUBA regulator is absurdly simple, which is good because complex things fail in complex ways, and complex failures underwater all lead inexorably to the same outcome.

                              There's a rubber diaphragm with one side facing the part that goes in your mouth (mouthpiece). The mouthpiece has some one-way valves so when you exhale, air goes out to the water, but when you inhale, water doesn't come in.

                              That rubber diaphragm will, thus, move inward when you inhale. The diaphragm is attached to a lever on the other side, so when you breathe in, the lever moves. The other end of the lever is hooked to a tiny needle valve, which lets air from the feed hose into the breathing chamber of the mouthpiece. When you stop inhaling, the pressure on the inside and outside of the diaphragm equalizes, it moves back to the "flat" position, and the needle valve closes. Any overpressure just goes out the vents to the water - sometimes that needle valve will stick and you get way more air than you want, but it's not harmful to you (aside from wasting breathable air and shortening the duration of your dive) because it just rushes out the vents.

                              philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              philsalkie@mindly.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #97

                              @oisin @grimalkina

                              This is referred to as the "secondary" regulator, BTW, because it's fed by a hose with a couple hundred PSI (10 bar) as opposed to the tank, which starts in the 3500 PSI range and drops to a couple hundred.

                              The primary regulator is a similar setup with a flexible metal diaphragm, it knocks the tank pressure down to a level that the secondary mechanism can handle. Usually a primary regulator will have several high pressure ports (for things like pressure gauges) and several low pressure ports (for secondary regulator, backup secondary regulator, buoyancy vest, etc.)

                              Now you've got the whole list!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ted@social.gould.cxT ted@social.gould.cx

                                @grimalkina there was an article I read on this long ago that I can no longer find that talked about how your grandma's recipes are simple, but you can't make them because of the context she left out. She was an expert and wrote down the details she needed to remember the recipe, but not enough that a novice could make it. Then it compared the differences in what would need to be said for the levels of expertise. Really made it hit home for me. Wish I could find the article again.

                                n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                n_dimension@infosec.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #98

                                @ted @grimalkina

                                Take 3 eggs and 1 pound of fujulicated flower.
                                Persertrate until you reach mildly furnacious consistency influkting raisins with vigour!
                                Place in an oven preheated to molfious temperature and bake until shanpy !

                                Enjoy!

                                #recipe

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                  @StompyRobot I would think absolutely!!

                                  holliek72@mastodonapp.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  holliek72@mastodonapp.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  holliek72@mastodonapp.uk
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #99

                                  @grimalkina @StompyRobot And also for the zipper experts to understand that the rest of us don't need to know exactly how zippers work in order to use them - they just work well enough that we can use them. This is a comment on computing ...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                    In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

                                    - how a sewing machine works
                                    - how a can opener works
                                    - how a flush toilet operates
                                    - how the heart pumps blood
                                    - how piano keys make sound

                                    Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
                                    - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
                                    - how a transistor works

                                    *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

                                    robotistry@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    robotistry@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    robotistry@fediscience.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #100

                                    @grimalkina As an engineer, I have both

                                    - a surface level grasp of how most of these things work (because I have at one time or another learned it, had to make repairs, or had to figure out whether repairs were possible)

                                    AND

                                    - copies of "The Way Things Work" and similar books, where mammoths explain them with easy to follow diagrams!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                      Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                                      Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                                      wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wiredfool@fosstodon.org
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #101

                                      @grimalkina
                                      And if you can, did you have David McCauleys The Way Things Work as a kid?

                                      wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                        Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                                        Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                                        hawaii@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hawaii@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hawaii@mastodon.world
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #102

                                        @grimalkina Fifty fans standing in two stadium rows, shaking hands as they do “the wave.”

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                          so zippers are really interesting as something people take for granted in clothes but they weren't always there.

                                          it’s why i wanted to study the logic of crafting pants in a zipperless world.

                                          well, for starters, pants aren’t trousers because pants are held up by a belt whereas trousers are held up by a fly.

                                          a zipperless world forces you to fit the pants with just enough ease to keep the pants up without a belt or with an open fly.

                                          it’s technique over tech. /🧵

                                          @grimalkina

                                          ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ericlawton@kolektiva.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #103

                                          @blogdiva

                                          I think I was about 12 when I got my first pair with a zip. Buttons before that.

                                          Mid 1960s England.

                                          @grimalkina

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper