Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. OpenAI used to be a not-for-profit corporation.

OpenAI used to be a not-for-profit corporation.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
13 Indlæg 6 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    What would have happened if they'd remained a non-profit? If they had informed the world about the actual nature of the technology?

    But, there were too many excited conversations with phrases like "world changing sums of money" and "singularity" -- the commitment to the "public good" went out the window since the effective Altruist knows that obtaining world changing money is the most beneficial thing for humanity as only they know how to use the power of the money best.

    3/

    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
    energisch_@troet.cafe
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #4

    @futurebird it would have been copied illegally and used to make enormous sums of money. The hype would have happened anyway.

    gdupont@framapiaf.orgG futurebird@sauropods.winF 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      What would have happened if they'd remained a non-profit? If they had informed the world about the actual nature of the technology?

      But, there were too many excited conversations with phrases like "world changing sums of money" and "singularity" -- the commitment to the "public good" went out the window since the effective Altruist knows that obtaining world changing money is the most beneficial thing for humanity as only they know how to use the power of the money best.

      3/

      darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      darkling@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #5

      @futurebird Effective altruism has never been about the altruism, or effective.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        What would have happened if they'd remained a non-profit? If they had informed the world about the actual nature of the technology?

        But, there were too many excited conversations with phrases like "world changing sums of money" and "singularity" -- the commitment to the "public good" went out the window since the effective Altruist knows that obtaining world changing money is the most beneficial thing for humanity as only they know how to use the power of the money best.

        3/

        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.win
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #6

        This is why Elon Musk says the government will “issue people cheques” like it's some incidental detail. That's "Effective Altruism" for you.

        Somewhere along the way most of the players have realized that this is not a science fiction movie and there is no "singularity" ... but they also realized they could still get their hands on that world changing money if they can just keep enough people believing that it's true. Long enough to cash out.

        Then they will fix everything. Don't worry. 4/4

        bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB futurebird@sauropods.winF jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          This is why Elon Musk says the government will “issue people cheques” like it's some incidental detail. That's "Effective Altruism" for you.

          Somewhere along the way most of the players have realized that this is not a science fiction movie and there is no "singularity" ... but they also realized they could still get their hands on that world changing money if they can just keep enough people believing that it's true. Long enough to cash out.

          Then they will fix everything. Don't worry. 4/4

          bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
          bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
          bytebro@mastodonapp.uk
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #7

          @futurebird

          For some reason, I read "they also realized they could still get their hands on that world changing money if they can just keep enough people believing that it's true", and immediately thought, "Oh, like Amway, back in the day".

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            This is why Elon Musk says the government will “issue people cheques” like it's some incidental detail. That's "Effective Altruism" for you.

            Somewhere along the way most of the players have realized that this is not a science fiction movie and there is no "singularity" ... but they also realized they could still get their hands on that world changing money if they can just keep enough people believing that it's true. Long enough to cash out.

            Then they will fix everything. Don't worry. 4/4

            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
            futurebird@sauropods.win
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #8

            "World changing sums of wealth" should never be in the hands of small groups of people, especially those able to work in secret.

            The future belongs to everyone. Just saying the "the future is for everyone" is a tautology. It means nothing.

            Everyone should shape the future rather than be told by someone else, where to go, what to do and when to die.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe

              @futurebird it would have been copied illegally and used to make enormous sums of money. The hype would have happened anyway.

              gdupont@framapiaf.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
              gdupont@framapiaf.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
              gdupont@framapiaf.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #9

              @energisch_ @futurebird they could have made the models fully open source...

              energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                This is why Elon Musk says the government will “issue people cheques” like it's some incidental detail. That's "Effective Altruism" for you.

                Somewhere along the way most of the players have realized that this is not a science fiction movie and there is no "singularity" ... but they also realized they could still get their hands on that world changing money if they can just keep enough people believing that it's true. Long enough to cash out.

                Then they will fix everything. Don't worry. 4/4

                jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jgrg@mstdn.science
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #10

                @futurebird I'm bored with LLM-based "AI". Useful tools for some tasks have been made with LLMs. They produce a powerful illusion of understanding, but don't *know* anything. They're not suitable for building critical systems, and I can't believe they're the pathway to AGI.

                futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe

                  @futurebird it would have been copied illegally and used to make enormous sums of money. The hype would have happened anyway.

                  futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                  futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                  futurebird@sauropods.win
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #11

                  @energisch_

                  Probably but it might be a more "right sized" level of hype.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gdupont@framapiaf.orgG gdupont@framapiaf.org

                    @energisch_ @futurebird they could have made the models fully open source...

                    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    energisch_@troet.cafe
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #12

                    @gdupont good point @futurebird

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ jgrg@mstdn.science

                      @futurebird I'm bored with LLM-based "AI". Useful tools for some tasks have been made with LLMs. They produce a powerful illusion of understanding, but don't *know* anything. They're not suitable for building critical systems, and I can't believe they're the pathway to AGI.

                      futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                      futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                      futurebird@sauropods.win
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #13

                      @jgrg

                      "I can't believe they're the pathway to AGI."

                      This was kind of obvious from the start but that this point we have gone beyond due diligence in giving the possibility of this being even remotely true a chance.

                      But, people will get very mad at you for saying so since they haven't cashed out yet. *shhhh* just please bro, let me have this etc. etc.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper