Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I missed reading Starlink's latest conjunction report when it came out a bit over a month ago.

I missed reading Starlink's latest conjunction report when it came out a bit over a month ago.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
72 Indlæg 41 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • amgine@mamot.frA amgine@mamot.fr

    @sundogplanets

    I have been of the opinion for a while now this is deliberate. The goal is, in fact, to precipitate a Kessler syndrome. It fits with a number of other nihilistic actions M Musk has taken, and his particular attraction to activities in which he gains recompense for doing harms.

    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #25

    @Amgine If they wanted Kessler Syndrome they could have very easily done it already.

    amgine@mamot.frA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      I missed reading Starlink's latest conjunction report when it came out a bit over a month ago. I just skimmed through it and I think I need to go lay down for a while. It's terrifying how close we are to major collisions in orbit all the time... (I especially love the note about how space-track.org being offline briefly caused them to miss a potential collision... SO FRAGILE AAUGH)

      Article summarizing the report here: https://ca.pcmag.com/networking/16653/260-starlink-satellites-burn-up-in-earths-atmosphere-as-more-head-for-fiery-ends

      Full report here: https://www.scribd.com/document/1057502572/SpaceX-Gen1-Gen2-Semi-Annual-Report-7-1-26

      davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      davecb@hachyderm.io
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #26

      @sundogplanets Are we better off if a (smaller?) cascade happens early, and starlink needs to deorbit as many of its satellites as it can?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        They also list 4 "disposal failures" which are satellites that died before SpaceX purposefully chucked them into the atmosphere. This includes Starlink 34343 which either exploded or got hit by debris a couple months ago. https://keeptrack.space/deep-dive/starlink-34343

        4 out of thousands of launched satellites is pretty good. But when you have nearly 11,000 satellites, you have to operate COMPLETELY PERFECTLY every minute of every day, forever.

        Please don't fuck up more than you already have, SpaceX.

        action_jay@thecanadian.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        action_jay@thecanadian.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        action_jay@thecanadian.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #27

        @sundogplanets I feel like there's gonna be a day where they just abandon it all for whatever asinine reason and it rains space junk all over, all at once, with no accountability

        spacemagick@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          I missed reading Starlink's latest conjunction report when it came out a bit over a month ago. I just skimmed through it and I think I need to go lay down for a while. It's terrifying how close we are to major collisions in orbit all the time... (I especially love the note about how space-track.org being offline briefly caused them to miss a potential collision... SO FRAGILE AAUGH)

          Article summarizing the report here: https://ca.pcmag.com/networking/16653/260-starlink-satellites-burn-up-in-earths-atmosphere-as-more-head-for-fiery-ends

          Full report here: https://www.scribd.com/document/1057502572/SpaceX-Gen1-Gen2-Semi-Annual-Report-7-1-26

          Q This user is from outside of this forum
          Q This user is from outside of this forum
          quizzicus@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #28

          @sundogplanets So a modern Ted Kaczynski could simply DDoS space-track.org?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            @startswithabang Some of the foundational work for that is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21328

            startswithabang@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            startswithabang@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            startswithabang@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #29

            @sundogplanets Bah, science in its infancy is one of the most promising, and frustrating (for its lack of definitive answers), types all at once!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              They also list 4 "disposal failures" which are satellites that died before SpaceX purposefully chucked them into the atmosphere. This includes Starlink 34343 which either exploded or got hit by debris a couple months ago. https://keeptrack.space/deep-dive/starlink-34343

              4 out of thousands of launched satellites is pretty good. But when you have nearly 11,000 satellites, you have to operate COMPLETELY PERFECTLY every minute of every day, forever.

              Please don't fuck up more than you already have, SpaceX.

              rin3d@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rin3d@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rin3d@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #30

              @sundogplanets I dont see any reason to freak out about it. They are low orbit sats with natural fallback of 5 years, spacex could go bust and all the sats left and it'd all be gone in a few years.
              They all are designed to full burn up before risk to ground and no evidence of them failing to fully burn after hundreds of burns.

              The real shit you should worry about is high orbit sats that are 20 years old and actually able to cause Kessler syndrome.

              brkloeckner@piaille.frB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                @Amgine If they wanted Kessler Syndrome they could have very easily done it already.

                amgine@mamot.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                amgine@mamot.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                amgine@mamot.fr
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #31

                @sundogplanets

                But not with plausible deniability.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Oh gosh I just did the math on the maneuver rate, which I couldn't bring myself to do earlier. More than 207,000 collision avoidance maneuvers in 6 months.

                  That means that somewhere in the Starlink megaconstellation, a satellite is performing a collision avoidance maneuver EVERY 1.25 MINUTES (EVERY 75 SECONDS)

                  AAAHHHH I'M SURE THAT'S FINE.

                  And now I find myself reading about asteroid collisional cascades. For no particular reason...

                  bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bytebro@mastodonapp.uk
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #32

                  @sundogplanets
                  I'm actually looking forward to the Kessler Cascade thing. Yeah, it might make GPS a bit hard for a while, but it might shut some of the nonces up,

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    @startswithabang Some of the foundational work for that is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21328

                    jaztrophysicist@social.sciences.reJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jaztrophysicist@social.sciences.reJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jaztrophysicist@social.sciences.re
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #33

                    @sundogplanets @startswithabang oh yes as if the one single thing the climate still needed in this era was a good trashing of the ozone layer by catalytic metals.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      I missed reading Starlink's latest conjunction report when it came out a bit over a month ago. I just skimmed through it and I think I need to go lay down for a while. It's terrifying how close we are to major collisions in orbit all the time... (I especially love the note about how space-track.org being offline briefly caused them to miss a potential collision... SO FRAGILE AAUGH)

                      Article summarizing the report here: https://ca.pcmag.com/networking/16653/260-starlink-satellites-burn-up-in-earths-atmosphere-as-more-head-for-fiery-ends

                      Full report here: https://www.scribd.com/document/1057502572/SpaceX-Gen1-Gen2-Semi-Annual-Report-7-1-26

                      zhksh@sigmoid.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zhksh@sigmoid.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zhksh@sigmoid.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #34

                      @sundogplanets i have worked for ESA and heard multiple stories about them trying to get *someone" at Starlink on the phone because of imminent collisions and missing agreements on who takes evasive action (settled now). Pretty wild

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lediva@lediva.masto.hostL lediva@lediva.masto.host

                        @sundogplanets Are you aware of any organizations working to reduce the chances of Kessler syndrome happening above us?

                        zhksh@sigmoid.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                        zhksh@sigmoid.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                        zhksh@sigmoid.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #35

                        @LeDiva @sundogplanets lots of efforts at ESA

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          I missed reading Starlink's latest conjunction report when it came out a bit over a month ago. I just skimmed through it and I think I need to go lay down for a while. It's terrifying how close we are to major collisions in orbit all the time... (I especially love the note about how space-track.org being offline briefly caused them to miss a potential collision... SO FRAGILE AAUGH)

                          Article summarizing the report here: https://ca.pcmag.com/networking/16653/260-starlink-satellites-burn-up-in-earths-atmosphere-as-more-head-for-fiery-ends

                          Full report here: https://www.scribd.com/document/1057502572/SpaceX-Gen1-Gen2-Semi-Annual-Report-7-1-26

                          swordgeek@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          swordgeek@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          swordgeek@mstdn.ca
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #36

                          @sundogplanets Collisions at all will be terrible, but at what point do we reach critical mass for a runaway chain reaction?

                          michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • swordgeek@mstdn.caS swordgeek@mstdn.ca

                            @sundogplanets Collisions at all will be terrible, but at what point do we reach critical mass for a runaway chain reaction?

                            michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                            michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                            michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #37

                            @swordgeek

                            If active avoidance fails, collisions would start happening in low orbit within a few days.

                            @sundogplanets and company have done the math: https://outerspaceinstitute.ca/crashclock/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • rin3d@mastodon.socialR rin3d@mastodon.social

                              @sundogplanets I dont see any reason to freak out about it. They are low orbit sats with natural fallback of 5 years, spacex could go bust and all the sats left and it'd all be gone in a few years.
                              They all are designed to full burn up before risk to ground and no evidence of them failing to fully burn after hundreds of burns.

                              The real shit you should worry about is high orbit sats that are 20 years old and actually able to cause Kessler syndrome.

                              brkloeckner@piaille.frB This user is from outside of this forum
                              brkloeckner@piaille.frB This user is from outside of this forum
                              brkloeckner@piaille.fr
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #38

                              @Rin3d @sundogplanets Do you understand that the person you answer is a specialist of the topic, and if I remember correctly has been investigating actual debris from Starlink satellites that fell on the ground (see https://thenarwhal.ca/space-junk-falling-50th-parallel/, even with a photo of her with space debris)?
                              I cannot be sure you are a man, but your message looks like a strong contender for the worst mansplaining of the year.

                              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • falken@qoto.orgF falken@qoto.org

                                @davidtheeviloverlord @sundogplanets They are in so low orbits they de-orbit themselves if they ran out of fuel, or for some other reason couldn't safe themselves

                                davidtheeviloverlord@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                davidtheeviloverlord@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                davidtheeviloverlord@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #39

                                @falken @sundogplanets

                                🎶 Starlinks keep falling on my head,
                                But that doesn't mean that I will soon be turning dead🎶

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  They also list 4 "disposal failures" which are satellites that died before SpaceX purposefully chucked them into the atmosphere. This includes Starlink 34343 which either exploded or got hit by debris a couple months ago. https://keeptrack.space/deep-dive/starlink-34343

                                  4 out of thousands of launched satellites is pretty good. But when you have nearly 11,000 satellites, you have to operate COMPLETELY PERFECTLY every minute of every day, forever.

                                  Please don't fuck up more than you already have, SpaceX.

                                  autolycos@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  autolycos@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  autolycos@beige.party
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #40

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • swordgeek@mstdn.caS swordgeek@mstdn.ca

                                    @sundogplanets Collisions at all will be terrible, but at what point do we reach critical mass for a runaway chain reaction?

                                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #41

                                    @swordgeek Oh we're beyond the limit. Some parts of orbit are already in Kessler Syndrome, but the early stages are slow.

                                    fiigvam@ravenation.clubF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • brkloeckner@piaille.frB brkloeckner@piaille.fr

                                      @Rin3d @sundogplanets Do you understand that the person you answer is a specialist of the topic, and if I remember correctly has been investigating actual debris from Starlink satellites that fell on the ground (see https://thenarwhal.ca/space-junk-falling-50th-parallel/, even with a photo of her with space debris)?
                                      I cannot be sure you are a man, but your message looks like a strong contender for the worst mansplaining of the year.

                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #42

                                      @BrKloeckner Thank you.

                                      brkloeckner@piaille.frB ysegrim@furry.engineerY 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        Oh gosh I just did the math on the maneuver rate, which I couldn't bring myself to do earlier. More than 207,000 collision avoidance maneuvers in 6 months.

                                        That means that somewhere in the Starlink megaconstellation, a satellite is performing a collision avoidance maneuver EVERY 1.25 MINUTES (EVERY 75 SECONDS)

                                        AAAHHHH I'M SURE THAT'S FINE.

                                        And now I find myself reading about asteroid collisional cascades. For no particular reason...

                                        missgayle@urbanists.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        missgayle@urbanists.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        missgayle@urbanists.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #43

                                        @sundogplanets

                                        Small meteors hit the earth all the time, iirc? Now imagine a not-so-tiny one sideswiping the atmosphere and taking out a whole swathe of satellites, sending them careening in every direction...

                                        On the upside, gps tracking of people's cars and phones will no longer be possible.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          @BrKloeckner Thank you.

                                          brkloeckner@piaille.frB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          brkloeckner@piaille.frB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          brkloeckner@piaille.fr
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #44

                                          @sundogplanets You're welcome. Sorry you have to put up with that, I assumed you should not also have to carry the weight of letting such people know it is not ok.

                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper