Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Solarpunk Urbanism
  3. Can you see three trees?

Can you see three trees?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Solarpunk Urbanism
urbanism
11 Indlæg 9 Posters 33 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
    This post did not contain any content.
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    kind_to_everyone@slrpnk.net
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2

    It is bizarre how hostile to humans we build cities.

    Reducing the urban heat island effect is the easiest countermeasure to mitigate some of the effects of climate change. A tree canopy is cheap with additional benefits to psychological well-being and air quality.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    14
    • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
      This post did not contain any content.
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      plyth@feddit.org
      wrote on sidst redigeret af plyth@feddit.org
      #3

      Great concept.

      How is 30% tree coverage possible? The Street has to fully be covered and the house needs a garden. As long as trees are not on a roof, dense housing becomes impossible.

      grrgyle@slrpnk.netG povoq@slrpnk.netP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P plyth@feddit.org

        Great concept.

        How is 30% tree coverage possible? The Street has to fully be covered and the house needs a garden. As long as trees are not on a roof, dense housing becomes impossible.

        grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
        grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
        grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #4

        Tree lined sidewalks cover a lot of space once the trees become mature. And maybe dense housing with parks and green patches

        1 Reply Last reply
        5
        • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
          This post did not contain any content.
          grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
          grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
          grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #5

          I like how simple it is

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • K kind_to_everyone@slrpnk.net

            It is bizarre how hostile to humans we build cities.

            Reducing the urban heat island effect is the easiest countermeasure to mitigate some of the effects of climate change. A tree canopy is cheap with additional benefits to psychological well-being and air quality.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            tiresia@slrpnk.net
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #6

            Cities are hostile to humans for the same reason barns are hostile to cattle. As long as we’re willing to treat sentient beings as livestock, why would we expect ourselves to be treated any differently?

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • P plyth@feddit.org

              Great concept.

              How is 30% tree coverage possible? The Street has to fully be covered and the house needs a garden. As long as trees are not on a roof, dense housing becomes impossible.

              povoq@slrpnk.netP This user is from outside of this forum
              povoq@slrpnk.netP This user is from outside of this forum
              povoq@slrpnk.net
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #7

              With parks in between and maybe block designs that include interior shared green-spaces that seems very compatible with dense housing. On the contrary, dense housing uses less surface area per inhabitant (due to stacking apartments vertically) thus there is more space left for trees in between.

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
                This post did not contain any content.
                teft@piefed.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                teft@piefed.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                teft@piefed.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #8

                I live in a green city so i can see like ten or so from my window. It really does keep the heat down here in the tropics.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  inari@piefed.zipI This user is from outside of this forum
                  inari@piefed.zipI This user is from outside of this forum
                  inari@piefed.zip
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  I see zero trees from my Tokyo apartment window 😞

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    schmorpel@slrpnk.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schmorpel@slrpnk.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schmorpel@slrpnk.net
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    I can see more than 300 trees from out of my window. I feel like my stubborn refusal of being normal and following the rules brought me here and feel like I’ve secretly hacked the system. I also feel that more than half of the city dwellers wouldn’t want to swap places with me after they learn there’s bugs everywhere and no AC.

                    The 3-30-300 rule is an excellent benchmark. I’m more than a little surprised that the only German cities achieving this are in the Ruhr area around Essen. Really, wtf?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      slippihud@slrpnk.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                      slippihud@slrpnk.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                      slippihud@slrpnk.net
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      I can see three trees from every window in my home. Most are in my yard. But if I discounted those trees, I’d still see 3 trees from every window.

                      I live in a low-middle income neighborhood and I think it probably meets this 3-30-300 metric.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper