Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The Onion has an AI policy.

The Onion has an AI policy.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
56 Indlæg 48 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • fiigvam@ravenation.clubF fiigvam@ravenation.club

    @Crow @jalefkowit I don't see why you say bare minimum. Today this is a principled position that is against the grain regardless of what you, I, or Mastodon think. We should applaud and push them to maintain that position, but it's not the bare minimum IMO.

    wizzwizz4@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
    wizzwizz4@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
    wizzwizz4@fosstodon.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #28

    @fiigvam @Crow @jalefkowit It is the bare minimum because anything less than this is unacceptable. But we are cheering and applauding: that's what "hell yeah" is. (Because, as you say, this is a too-rare decision these days.)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

      The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

      https://theonion.com/about-us/

      wizzwizz4@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
      wizzwizz4@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
      wizzwizz4@fosstodon.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #29

      @jalefkowit So, what I'm hearing is, The Onion is a source of high-quality, up-to-date training data, which will make my AI smarterer without risk of model collapse by teaching it many facts.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

        The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

        https://theonion.com/about-us/

        theonedoc@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
        theonedoc@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
        theonedoc@tech.lgbt
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #30

        @jalefkowit I only doslike that they limit it to "creative".

        That garbage needs to be banned IN ALL roles.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

          The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

          https://theonion.com/about-us/

          clintonanderson@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
          clintonanderson@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
          clintonanderson@universeodon.com
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #31

          @jalefkowit

          #FuckAI

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

            The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

            https://theonion.com/about-us/

            david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
            david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
            david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #32

            @jalefkowit I don't really like this because 'an existential threat to the livelihood of creative professionals' can be read to mean that bullshit generators could actually substitute for the writers of The Onion. I'd much rather that they either omitted this part or explained it in a way that doesn't make that implication.

            jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ tedmielczarek@mastodon.socialT H 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

              The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

              https://theonion.com/about-us/

              johnniemac@mastodon.scotJ This user is from outside of this forum
              johnniemac@mastodon.scotJ This user is from outside of this forum
              johnniemac@mastodon.scot
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #33

              @jalefkowit unless it is also satire…

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • bogwitch@social.data.coopB bogwitch@social.data.coop shared this topic
              • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                @lumi @jalefkowit

                Programming is out of scope for a "newspaper". A policy stating objects/activities the company doesn't engage in is just soapboxing. That's what articles are for, not policy pages.

                lumi@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
                lumi@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
                lumi@snug.moe
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #34

                @lxskllr @jalefkowit i disagree, it still makes a statement that genai is not ok for code

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange

                  @jalefkowit Wow, so well said. I wish more organizations adopted this mindset 💚

                  solitha@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  solitha@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  solitha@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #35

                  @Em0nM4stodon Yeah I'd much rather be reluctantly acknowledged by companies with principles like this, than all the alternatives we currently face.

                  @jalefkowit

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                    The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                    https://theonion.com/about-us/

                    farooqkz@mastodon.bsd.cafeF This user is from outside of this forum
                    farooqkz@mastodon.bsd.cafeF This user is from outside of this forum
                    farooqkz@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #36

                    @jalefkowit

                    Well actually if a human can be replaced by AI, this probably means the human hasn't got a valuable skill.

                    I can say no AI can replace me to write the code I write, the blog posts I write, and the books I'm going to write.

                    This also true about many artists.

                    However, not many understand value of a good writing/art/code/video. Fewer who can tell if it's a good and creative one by looking at it.

                    So this is the real problem not just AI. But also the people who don't understand.

                    H 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                      The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                      https://theonion.com/about-us/

                      mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mle_online@social.afront.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #37

                      @jalefkowit If only I could get the community theater to adopt a policy like this

                      alienghic@timeloop.cafeA aud@fire.asta.lgbtA 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                        The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                        https://theonion.com/about-us/

                        guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        guillotine_jones@beige.party
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #38

                        @jalefkowit
                        The Onion announces policy of not using Ai-generated content.
                        Bong hits 4 The Onion.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                          @jalefkowit I don't really like this because 'an existential threat to the livelihood of creative professionals' can be read to mean that bullshit generators could actually substitute for the writers of The Onion. I'd much rather that they either omitted this part or explained it in a way that doesn't make that implication.

                          jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jgrg@mstdn.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jgrg@mstdn.science
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #39

                          @david_chisnall @jalefkowit Which prompts the question in my mind: has an AI ever written something funny?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

                            @jalefkowit If only I could get the community theater to adopt a policy like this

                            alienghic@timeloop.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alienghic@timeloop.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alienghic@timeloop.cafe
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #40

                            @MLE_online @jalefkowit

                            I bet showing them the onions policy makes it more likely they'll adopt something similar. A lot of people prefer making decisions by copying someone they respect's answers.

                            mle_online@social.afront.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                              @jalefkowit I don't really like this because 'an existential threat to the livelihood of creative professionals' can be read to mean that bullshit generators could actually substitute for the writers of The Onion. I'd much rather that they either omitted this part or explained it in a way that doesn't make that implication.

                              tedmielczarek@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tedmielczarek@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tedmielczarek@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #41

                              @david_chisnall @jalefkowit as we've seen in the current state of the world, LLMs do not need to be *good* in order to harm entire industries. There's a lot of slop out there taking up space that human creativity used to fill.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • alienghic@timeloop.cafeA alienghic@timeloop.cafe

                                @MLE_online @jalefkowit

                                I bet showing them the onions policy makes it more likely they'll adopt something similar. A lot of people prefer making decisions by copying someone they respect's answers.

                                mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mle_online@social.afront.org
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #42

                                @alienghic @jalefkowit I bet not. But I am going to keep being really annoying about this. I will send them everything I stumble upon like this, and I will bring it up at every board meeting until we do something

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                                  The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                                  https://theonion.com/about-us/

                                  lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lemgandi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lemgandi@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #43

                                  @jalefkowit

                                  I am a subscriber. They are Good People.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • farooqkz@mastodon.bsd.cafeF farooqkz@mastodon.bsd.cafe

                                    @jalefkowit

                                    Well actually if a human can be replaced by AI, this probably means the human hasn't got a valuable skill.

                                    I can say no AI can replace me to write the code I write, the blog posts I write, and the books I'm going to write.

                                    This also true about many artists.

                                    However, not many understand value of a good writing/art/code/video. Fewer who can tell if it's a good and creative one by looking at it.

                                    So this is the real problem not just AI. But also the people who don't understand.

                                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                                    hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #44

                                    "if a human can be replaced by AI" is load-bearing here, and is mostly a marketing position from AI companies.

                                    Additionally, every human creative endeavor is worthwhile, no matter the output's quality, which is arguably subjective. Generative AI just doesn't have a good place in human society.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                                      The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                                      https://theonion.com/about-us/

                                      mimsybean@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mimsybean@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mimsybean@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #45

                                      @jalefkowit Excellent news!!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

                                        @jalefkowit If only I could get the community theater to adopt a policy like this

                                        aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aud@fire.asta.lgbt
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #46

                                        @MLE_online@social.afront.org @jalefkowit@hachyderm.io I... a community theater that wants to use generative ML??

                                        that is... depressing

                                        mle_online@social.afront.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • aud@fire.asta.lgbtA aud@fire.asta.lgbt

                                          @MLE_online@social.afront.org @jalefkowit@hachyderm.io I... a community theater that wants to use generative ML??

                                          that is... depressing

                                          mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mle_online@social.afront.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #47

                                          @aud @jalefkowit Unfortunately, we've had some set designers who are very lazy (and lacking in talent) who have used AI in their sets. As a board member, I've been pushing us to come up with a policy. Some of the board members are on my side, but others are just too credulous and are completely wowed by the magic box. They don't want to agree to a policy that would cut off access to a miraculous tool

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper