Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had.

all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
110 Indlæg 60 Posters 383 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • snoutgrab@woof.techS snoutgrab@woof.tech

    @jonny mmm, been thinking a little about this too.

    unpredictable rewards (will the task be solved or not), unpredictable timing... and the thing is always _almost_ there, just one more prompt, this might be the one...

    jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jonny@neuromatch.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    @snoutgrab
    Spectacular payoffs with hard withdrawal

    snoutgrab@woof.techS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

      @ainmosni
      Well good, keep those walls up, they are protective. I am not so lucky and rely on discipline and observation of the impacts on others. It sets my alarm bells ringing to run for cover, but to understand why the things are happening around me the only means has been to feel it for myself, and I get it.

      concretedog@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      concretedog@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      concretedog@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      @jonny @ainmosni gosh this convo hits... I am not a gambler and am pretty anti LLM ... really interesting.

      catch56@kolektiva.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

        @snoutgrab
        Spectacular payoffs with hard withdrawal

        snoutgrab@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
        snoutgrab@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
        snoutgrab@woof.tech
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        @jonny ohh yeah. and with ease of access, and an ecosystem of hype... it's so hard not to be exposed, unless you remove yourself from a lot of stuff. wide blast area these days. AI features in notepad.exe

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

          RE: https://hails.org/@hailey/116657391001259044

          all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had. the only metaphor i have been finding consistently useful for understanding what is happening with people and "AI" is addiction, and specifically gambling addiction.

          prema@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
          prema@hachyderm.ioP This user is from outside of this forum
          prema@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          @jonny exactly, when i talk to people who maybe just use ai a little bit, their reaponses quite align with things you’d hear from drug addict, some excuses, avoidance, bit of shame.
          And i agree that the patern is finally similar to gaming/gambling addiction

          tinybird@timetheft.socialT rhelune@todon.euR 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • snoutgrab@woof.techS snoutgrab@woof.tech

            @jonny mmm, been thinking a little about this too.

            unpredictable rewards (will the task be solved or not), unpredictable timing... and the thing is always _almost_ there, just one more prompt, this might be the one...

            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidgerard@circumstances.run
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            @snoutgrab @jonny the "hooked" loop. chatbots as mobile game.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

              i love gambling. i have used "AI" extensively. it feels the same.

              delawen@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              delawen@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              delawen@floss.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              @jonny I mean... https://www.addictioncenter.com/behavioral-addictions/ai-addiction/

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                @ainmosni
                Well good, keep those walls up, they are protective. I am not so lucky and rely on discipline and observation of the impacts on others. It sets my alarm bells ringing to run for cover, but to understand why the things are happening around me the only means has been to feel it for myself, and I get it.

                kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kalenxi@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                @jonny @ainmosni I've found for me I have to always remind myself to not get lazy when using AI because it's super tempting to just accept what it says without proper review just to get that dopamine hit of closing the bug report or feature request.

                I suspect that's what happened with rsync because it seems like they got a lot of CVE reports all at once and basically just told Claude "here deal with these". And AI is perfectly willing to solve a problem that doesn't exist if you tell it to.

                kalenxi@mastodon.socialK ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                  RE: https://hails.org/@hailey/116657391001259044

                  all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had. the only metaphor i have been finding consistently useful for understanding what is happening with people and "AI" is addiction, and specifically gambling addiction.

                  sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sassinake@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  @jonny

                  exactly what @pluralistic said about it a few months back

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • kalenxi@mastodon.socialK kalenxi@mastodon.social

                    @jonny @ainmosni I've found for me I have to always remind myself to not get lazy when using AI because it's super tempting to just accept what it says without proper review just to get that dopamine hit of closing the bug report or feature request.

                    I suspect that's what happened with rsync because it seems like they got a lot of CVE reports all at once and basically just told Claude "here deal with these". And AI is perfectly willing to solve a problem that doesn't exist if you tell it to.

                    kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kalenxi@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    @jonny @ainmosni Contrast that with curl where they also got a bunch of CVE reports from Mythos and upon manual review of the 5 reports they found only 1 actual vulnerability, 1 minor bug, and 3 false positives.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kalenxi@mastodon.socialK kalenxi@mastodon.social

                      @jonny @ainmosni I've found for me I have to always remind myself to not get lazy when using AI because it's super tempting to just accept what it says without proper review just to get that dopamine hit of closing the bug report or feature request.

                      I suspect that's what happened with rsync because it seems like they got a lot of CVE reports all at once and basically just told Claude "here deal with these". And AI is perfectly willing to solve a problem that doesn't exist if you tell it to.

                      ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                      ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                      ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      @KalenXI @jonny if you don't want to get lazy when using AI, is there really a use for it at all? I mean, it's been proven that reviewing code is much more difficult than writing it, so I'm finding it much more taxing to review slopcode than if I'd just write it myself.

                      Of course, that's adding the usual disclaimer that all this is not even relevant until the ethical and environmental shitshow of AI has been fixed.

                      kalenxi@mastodon.socialK R 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

                        @KalenXI @jonny if you don't want to get lazy when using AI, is there really a use for it at all? I mean, it's been proven that reviewing code is much more difficult than writing it, so I'm finding it much more taxing to review slopcode than if I'd just write it myself.

                        Of course, that's adding the usual disclaimer that all this is not even relevant until the ethical and environmental shitshow of AI has been fixed.

                        kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kalenxi@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #22

                        @ainmosni @jonny Personally I think it depends on how short of a leash you keep it on. I've found you should generally never let it decide how to solve a problem on it's own without review. But if you tell it the problem and also how it should fix it then it's usually pretty decent and I can review it quickly because I have an idea of what the solution should look like.

                        What makes me most nervous is when people use AI to solve problems that they don't have the skillset to verify the answer to.

                        ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kalenxi@mastodon.socialK kalenxi@mastodon.social

                          @ainmosni @jonny Personally I think it depends on how short of a leash you keep it on. I've found you should generally never let it decide how to solve a problem on it's own without review. But if you tell it the problem and also how it should fix it then it's usually pretty decent and I can review it quickly because I have an idea of what the solution should look like.

                          What makes me most nervous is when people use AI to solve problems that they don't have the skillset to verify the answer to.

                          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #23

                          @KalenXI @jonny Still sounds like if you just wrote it yourself it would be easier and less error prone.

                          But tell me, how do you justify giving money to huge fascist adjacent corporations that want to enclose the digital commons, make people dependent on their services for basic thought, while totally not caring how much scams, fake (child) porn, misinformation, propaganda, military strikes, etc, they enable?

                          kalenxi@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                            RE: https://hails.org/@hailey/116657391001259044

                            all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had. the only metaphor i have been finding consistently useful for understanding what is happening with people and "AI" is addiction, and specifically gambling addiction.

                            smolwaffle@union.placeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            smolwaffle@union.placeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            smolwaffle@union.place
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #24

                            @jonny
                            I have been on and off addicted to Path of Exile. Using LLMs to code feels very much the same. It's harder to quit, though, since no one paid me to play Path of Exile.
                            @praxeology

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • prema@hachyderm.ioP prema@hachyderm.io

                              @jonny exactly, when i talk to people who maybe just use ai a little bit, their reaponses quite align with things you’d hear from drug addict, some excuses, avoidance, bit of shame.
                              And i agree that the patern is finally similar to gaming/gambling addiction

                              tinybird@timetheft.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tinybird@timetheft.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tinybird@timetheft.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #25

                              @prema @jonny really, really secretive about what they're doing as well. I have a coworker who hides his use of LLMs now, and when it causes problems he just lies about it and casts blame on others

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

                                @KalenXI @jonny Still sounds like if you just wrote it yourself it would be easier and less error prone.

                                But tell me, how do you justify giving money to huge fascist adjacent corporations that want to enclose the digital commons, make people dependent on their services for basic thought, while totally not caring how much scams, fake (child) porn, misinformation, propaganda, military strikes, etc, they enable?

                                kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kalenxi@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #26

                                @ainmosni To be perfectly honest I don't believe I have a good answer. My inclination is to place the responsibility at the hands of those choosing to do the harm like the government doing the military strikes or the person making the porn. But I also don't believe you should knowingly give a a vulnerable person the means to their own downfall.

                                kalenxi@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kalenxi@mastodon.socialK kalenxi@mastodon.social

                                  @ainmosni To be perfectly honest I don't believe I have a good answer. My inclination is to place the responsibility at the hands of those choosing to do the harm like the government doing the military strikes or the person making the porn. But I also don't believe you should knowingly give a a vulnerable person the means to their own downfall.

                                  kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kalenxi@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #27

                                  @ainmosni
                                  I also believe we're currently in an unsustainable bubble where the true cost of all of this inference is subsidized by people who have been allowed to accrue too much capital. And I feel like in fairly short order people are going to have to start reckoning with whether all this is worth it when venture capital isn't covering 90% of the real cost for them.

                                  kalenxi@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • kalenxi@mastodon.socialK kalenxi@mastodon.social

                                    @ainmosni
                                    I also believe we're currently in an unsustainable bubble where the true cost of all of this inference is subsidized by people who have been allowed to accrue too much capital. And I feel like in fairly short order people are going to have to start reckoning with whether all this is worth it when venture capital isn't covering 90% of the real cost for them.

                                    kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kalenxi@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #28

                                    @ainmosni I'll also admit that I find it very difficult to truly understand what people who have an emotional relationship with AI are going through. Because my reaction to a software program feigning any kind of emotional understanding or empathy is to be extremely repulsed.

                                    kalenxi@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kalenxi@mastodon.socialK kalenxi@mastodon.social

                                      @ainmosni I'll also admit that I find it very difficult to truly understand what people who have an emotional relationship with AI are going through. Because my reaction to a software program feigning any kind of emotional understanding or empathy is to be extremely repulsed.

                                      kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kalenxi@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kalenxi@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #29

                                      @ainmosni And I do worry that the people who work for the AI companies seem to be imo somewhat delusional. Like asking a model what it wants to do in "retirement" and giving it a blog to express itself on rather than just turning it off. When they more than anyone should know it's just an algorithm and is therefore incapable of having feelings or opinions.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                                        RE: https://hails.org/@hailey/116657391001259044

                                        all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had. the only metaphor i have been finding consistently useful for understanding what is happening with people and "AI" is addiction, and specifically gambling addiction.

                                        fnrd@toots.nuF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fnrd@toots.nuF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fnrd@toots.nu
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #30

                                        @jonny As well... there are a few people I was amazed to talk to, especially science fiction loving guys higher up at tech companies (who are like, everywhere) which have an almost animistic belief that GAI currently exists. Got called small-minded, etc, which is fine. Sources and research didn't phase them.

                                        They sincerely believe in it, and you know you can't replace a belief with data and information. My anthropology courses have never been better applied than recently with the cultish behaviour around genAI. I'm interested in how it feels for people who get that gambling rush about genAI, and how it ties into beliefs, could it maybe strengthen the affect?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                                          RE: https://hails.org/@hailey/116657391001259044

                                          all the criticism has been said, all the takes been had. the only metaphor i have been finding consistently useful for understanding what is happening with people and "AI" is addiction, and specifically gambling addiction.

                                          shafik@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          shafik@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          shafik@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #31

                                          @jonny

                                          mandatory

                                          "LLMs are slot-machines": https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2025-08-16-jackpot-salience-bias-2a696501bba7

                                          and

                                          https://pony.social/@cadey/115089518168821130

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper