Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Politicians of all stripes conveniently underestimate the public support for green and environmental policies.

Politicians of all stripes conveniently underestimate the public support for green and environmental policies.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
climateactionclimatebreakdowlabourtoriesreform
38 Indlæg 7 Posters 38 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • kim_harding@mastodon.scotK kim_harding@mastodon.scot

    @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @afewbugs @pelle @mpjgregoire Sorry but why should EV infrastructure be publicly funded? E-cars are about proping up the motor industry, not about saving the planet. If we are serious about maintaining a livable planet then wasteful things like cars will have to go.

    Over the 20th C our cities were remodeling to make way for cars, now we need to reverse the damage done to make space for people and nature

    afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
    afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
    afewbugs@social.coop
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #27

    @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @pelle @mpjgregoire I think this is a progress over perfection thing. In the long term we need to get rid of private vehicles, but realistically starting from the way we've structured the world now the intermediate step needs to be replacing ICEs with EVs and lack of charging infrastructure is holding that back. Not just for personal mobility but vans transporting goods too, there's less of clear path to overhauling goods logistic than transporting people

    afewbugs@social.coopA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • afewbugs@social.coopA afewbugs@social.coop

      @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @pelle @mpjgregoire I think this is a progress over perfection thing. In the long term we need to get rid of private vehicles, but realistically starting from the way we've structured the world now the intermediate step needs to be replacing ICEs with EVs and lack of charging infrastructure is holding that back. Not just for personal mobility but vans transporting goods too, there's less of clear path to overhauling goods logistic than transporting people

      afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
      afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
      afewbugs@social.coop
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #28

      @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @pelle @mpjgregoire But I would definitely like to see that alongside massive investment in public transport, safe cycling infrastructure and rural broadband as well as rent controls in areas close to employment to reduce the amount of commuting that has to happen in the first place

      pelle@veganism.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • afewbugs@social.coopA afewbugs@social.coop

        @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @pelle @mpjgregoire But I would definitely like to see that alongside massive investment in public transport, safe cycling infrastructure and rural broadband as well as rent controls in areas close to employment to reduce the amount of commuting that has to happen in the first place

        pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        pelle@veganism.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #29

        @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire

        #electriccars are a fake #greenwashing solution, like #carboncapture, or like the danish "climate NGOs" telling people to drop cows and eat pigs instead to reduce CO₂:

        > At the moment, an electric car of 60 kilowatt hours (kWh) consuming 20 kilowatt hours per 100 kilometers would have to cover exactly 697,612 km before it is greener than an average petrol car that consumes six liters per 100 kilometers. This is what the Autogids.be website reports.
        https://www.ad.nl/auto/bericht-over-vuile-elektrische-auto-klopt-in-de-verste-verte-niet~a03b9a02/?slug_rd=1

        afewbugs@social.coopA wav3ydave@mas.toW 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social

          @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire

          #electriccars are a fake #greenwashing solution, like #carboncapture, or like the danish "climate NGOs" telling people to drop cows and eat pigs instead to reduce CO₂:

          > At the moment, an electric car of 60 kilowatt hours (kWh) consuming 20 kilowatt hours per 100 kilometers would have to cover exactly 697,612 km before it is greener than an average petrol car that consumes six liters per 100 kilometers. This is what the Autogids.be website reports.
          https://www.ad.nl/auto/bericht-over-vuile-elektrische-auto-klopt-in-de-verste-verte-niet~a03b9a02/?slug_rd=1

          afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
          afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
          afewbugs@social.coop
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #30

          @pelle @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire I actually support both of those examples as harm reduction measures - I would prefer it if people stopped eating animals altogether and we moved away from private vehicles entirely, but realistically that's not going to happen immediately and until we get there, if people won't give up meat entirely then switching from beef to pork will at least reduce carbon emissions, as will petrol to electric vehicle, and every gram of warming

          pelle@veganism.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social

            @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire

            #electriccars are a fake #greenwashing solution, like #carboncapture, or like the danish "climate NGOs" telling people to drop cows and eat pigs instead to reduce CO₂:

            > At the moment, an electric car of 60 kilowatt hours (kWh) consuming 20 kilowatt hours per 100 kilometers would have to cover exactly 697,612 km before it is greener than an average petrol car that consumes six liters per 100 kilometers. This is what the Autogids.be website reports.
            https://www.ad.nl/auto/bericht-over-vuile-elektrische-auto-klopt-in-de-verste-verte-niet~a03b9a02/?slug_rd=1

            wav3ydave@mas.toW This user is from outside of this forum
            wav3ydave@mas.toW This user is from outside of this forum
            wav3ydave@mas.to
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #31

            @pelle @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire There's a lot wrong with EVs, but that 700k km figure is absolute nonsense. For example, the calculation ascribes huge CO2 emmissions to battery production but none to petrol production. The actual break-even point is already easily below the life mileage of an average car and is only going to come down as the grid gets greener and battery tech improves.

            pelle@veganism.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • afewbugs@social.coopA afewbugs@social.coop

              @pelle @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire I actually support both of those examples as harm reduction measures - I would prefer it if people stopped eating animals altogether and we moved away from private vehicles entirely, but realistically that's not going to happen immediately and until we get there, if people won't give up meat entirely then switching from beef to pork will at least reduce carbon emissions, as will petrol to electric vehicle, and every gram of warming

              pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              pelle@veganism.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #32

              @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire
              ... and that's how you end up supporting sending millions of kids to #gaschambers as a "realistic" "green" policy. 😞

              https://pignorantfilm.com #lesserevilism #govegan #pigs

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wav3ydave@mas.toW wav3ydave@mas.to

                @pelle @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire There's a lot wrong with EVs, but that 700k km figure is absolute nonsense. For example, the calculation ascribes huge CO2 emmissions to battery production but none to petrol production. The actual break-even point is already easily below the life mileage of an average car and is only going to come down as the grid gets greener and battery tech improves.

                pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                pelle@veganism.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #33

                @wav3ydave @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire
                yes, but also the "correction" is based on secret numbers and hypotheticals:

                > The amount of CO2 that Ernst attributes to producing a battery of a modern electric car is ‘at least three times too high’, says Hoekstra. ,,And then I am still very careful. Those kinds of figures are very secret, no producer wants to say anything about it. [...] Hoekstra: ,,In the Netherlands, that number is still above 400. But if only half of the plans of the Climate Agreement are implemented, we will come to 200 over the years, I estimate.”

                it is clear that electric cars do not eliminate the emissions; the car kill count i posted before still stands; and 1/4 of all the world's microplastic pollution is from car tyres. we can't talk about any cars being a "green" mode of transport in any sense of that word.
                https://theconversation.com/car-tyres-shed-a-quarter-of-all-microplastics-in-the-environment-urgent-action-is-needed-244132

                afewbugs@social.coopA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social

                  @wav3ydave @afewbugs @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire
                  yes, but also the "correction" is based on secret numbers and hypotheticals:

                  > The amount of CO2 that Ernst attributes to producing a battery of a modern electric car is ‘at least three times too high’, says Hoekstra. ,,And then I am still very careful. Those kinds of figures are very secret, no producer wants to say anything about it. [...] Hoekstra: ,,In the Netherlands, that number is still above 400. But if only half of the plans of the Climate Agreement are implemented, we will come to 200 over the years, I estimate.”

                  it is clear that electric cars do not eliminate the emissions; the car kill count i posted before still stands; and 1/4 of all the world's microplastic pollution is from car tyres. we can't talk about any cars being a "green" mode of transport in any sense of that word.
                  https://theconversation.com/car-tyres-shed-a-quarter-of-all-microplastics-in-the-environment-urgent-action-is-needed-244132

                  afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
                  afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
                  afewbugs@social.coop
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #34

                  @pelle @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire I don't think anyone's arguing that evs are a "green" or good thing, just les damaging than petrol cars, and our disagreement is over whether it's worth going for a little less damage now or whether it's possible to go for the complete elimination of damage immediately

                  pelle@veganism.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • afewbugs@social.coopA afewbugs@social.coop

                    @pelle @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire I don't think anyone's arguing that evs are a "green" or good thing, just les damaging than petrol cars, and our disagreement is over whether it's worth going for a little less damage now or whether it's possible to go for the complete elimination of damage immediately

                    pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pelle@veganism.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af pelle@veganism.social
                    #35

                    @afewbugs @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire
                    the question is: less damage than what?

                    if i hit you in the face with a baseball bat, i could argue that it caused much less damage than the gun i was about to shoot you with, so you should be thankful to me that i reduced harm to you.

                    of course this is absurd, because it is unnecessary for me to attack you in the first place — just like it is unnecessary to eat animals.

                    in that way #lesserevilism / #lessharm / #lessmeat can lead to acceptance of a lot of evil, harm and meat eating.

                    last time i listened to a speech by someone from #effectivealtruism, she did a long presentation to explain how they could reduce harm by spending an awful lot of money on donating farming equipment to fish farms. 🙃

                    afewbugs@social.coopA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social

                      @afewbugs @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire
                      the question is: less damage than what?

                      if i hit you in the face with a baseball bat, i could argue that it caused much less damage than the gun i was about to shoot you with, so you should be thankful to me that i reduced harm to you.

                      of course this is absurd, because it is unnecessary for me to attack you in the first place — just like it is unnecessary to eat animals.

                      in that way #lesserevilism / #lessharm / #lessmeat can lead to acceptance of a lot of evil, harm and meat eating.

                      last time i listened to a speech by someone from #effectivealtruism, she did a long presentation to explain how they could reduce harm by spending an awful lot of money on donating farming equipment to fish farms. 🙃

                      afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
                      afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
                      afewbugs@social.coop
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #36

                      @pelle @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire okay I'll take your mildly threatening analogy and work with it.

                      If you were determined to harm me, I would rather you hit me in the face with a baseball bat than shot me, because in one scenario I would be injured and in one I would be dead, so yes I would support a harm reduction approach. Where I hope this is serving as a climate behaviour analogy and not an actual threat is in understanding why you wanted to harm me,

                      afewbugs@social.coopA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • afewbugs@social.coopA afewbugs@social.coop

                        @pelle @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire okay I'll take your mildly threatening analogy and work with it.

                        If you were determined to harm me, I would rather you hit me in the face with a baseball bat than shot me, because in one scenario I would be injured and in one I would be dead, so yes I would support a harm reduction approach. Where I hope this is serving as a climate behaviour analogy and not an actual threat is in understanding why you wanted to harm me,

                        afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
                        afewbugs@social.coopA This user is from outside of this forum
                        afewbugs@social.coop
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #37

                        @pelle @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire whether there was any scope to reduce that desire and what the barriers to doing so were, and most importantly how confident I can be in my estimation of all those values. As I cannot be 100% confident of my estimation I will favour taking both approaches.

                        Again, really hoping this is an analogy and not an actual threat I'm dealing with here, and would appreciate clarification

                        pelle@veganism.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • afewbugs@social.coopA afewbugs@social.coop

                          @pelle @wav3ydave @kim_harding @JugglingWithEggs @vfrmedia @mpjgregoire whether there was any scope to reduce that desire and what the barriers to doing so were, and most importantly how confident I can be in my estimation of all those values. As I cannot be 100% confident of my estimation I will favour taking both approaches.

                          Again, really hoping this is an analogy and not an actual threat I'm dealing with here, and would appreciate clarification

                          pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pelle@veganism.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #38

                          @afewbugs
                          i mean, for people who would like to be knocked in the head to reduce harm, i'm always there to help.

                          for the people who advocate #gaschamber as #harmreduction, i don't have the full equipment but i believe plastic bags work just as well.

                          i am saying this in jest of course, but the sad truth is that the threats from the #gaschamber advocates are genuine and deadly. 😔

                          i am thankful that you eat #vegan but i am always astounded when someone finds it "imposing" to ask others to eat #plantbased while genuinely considering gassing kids as #harmreduction. 💨🐷

                          i believe that is what #stevebest would describe as #vegan #stockholmsyndrome: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHDTZniuzyc

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper