Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology.

I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
8 Indlæg 8 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jsbarretto@social.coopJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jsbarretto@social.coopJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jsbarretto@social.coop
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

    dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD happyborg@fosstodon.orgH paulamaddox@mastodon.socialP S rosset7i@mastodon.socialR 7 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

      I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

      dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
      dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
      dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @jsbarretto actually i really only think it's going to be faster if you're running it without checks. if you're not phoning it in, i found it slower.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

        I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

        happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
        happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
        happyborg@fosstodon.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @jsbarretto research I've seen says 10% while those using it become less capable due to cognitive decline, and vastly over estimate the benefits they receive.

        It truly is the ultra wealthy creating a new #LLM asbestos that they fully intend to make everyone swallow regardless of the detrimental impact because it gives them more power and control.

        It's not about profits, they have plenty of money. This is about controlling a population when people become desperate.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

          I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

          paulamaddox@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          paulamaddox@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          paulamaddox@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @jsbarretto plus the environmental impacts of the power usage and water usage!

          Let alone the other impacts like the rising cost of electronics parts meaning smaller businesses can't afford to start or ship product.

          AI is a trainwreck, this is going to be worse than the dotcom bubble when it goes bad...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

            I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            slotos@toot.community
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @jsbarretto 20% shittier, not faster. That definitely changes the equation!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

              I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

              rosset7i@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rosset7i@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rosset7i@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @jsbarretto Solving aging or curing cancer doesn't help the companies funding this tech. LLMs are designed to give even more power to the 1%, it's the perfect scheme, you pay for a tech that makes you stupid and more dependent on said tech. If LLMs could really empower the regular person, they would NOT be pushing it down everyone's throats.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

                I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

                afterdeathtruth@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                afterdeathtruth@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                afterdeathtruth@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @jsbarretto For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
                - Romans 6:23 KJV

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

                  I want to remind you: these bastards have spent $1.5 trillion of society's money on this technology. That it's produced *something* should not be surprising. That's 'solve aging', 'cure cancer', 'eliminate all poverty', 'shift climate change into reverse', or 'send a probe to another solar system' money. It's not 'write shit software 20% faster' money.

                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @jsbarretto
                  what is the antecedent to "this"

                  a very common error on social media, a pronoun without a clear antecedent

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
                  Svar
                  • Svar som emne
                  Login for at svare
                  • Ældste til nyeste
                  • Nyeste til ældste
                  • Most Votes


                  • Log ind

                  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  Graciously hosted by data.coop
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Hjem
                  • Seneste
                  • Etiketter
                  • Populære
                  • Verden
                  • Bruger
                  • Grupper