Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. A simple, effective way to regulate AI is to put a cap on how many datacenters that can be built.

A simple, effective way to regulate AI is to put a cap on how many datacenters that can be built.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
5 Indlæg 4 Posters 4 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
    benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
    benjaoming@social.data.coop
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    A simple, effective way to regulate AI is to put a cap on how many datacenters that can be built.

    It's easy for lawmakers, and will (if capitalism does its work) shift the limited resources to the most profitable usages of AI.

    Of course, that'd make the bubble burst... which would suck because it's a pretty big bubble with quite a lot of vested interested, but meh 🤷

    jpkolsen@social.data.coopJ gentauro@mastodon.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • benjaoming@social.data.coopB benjaoming@social.data.coop

      A simple, effective way to regulate AI is to put a cap on how many datacenters that can be built.

      It's easy for lawmakers, and will (if capitalism does its work) shift the limited resources to the most profitable usages of AI.

      Of course, that'd make the bubble burst... which would suck because it's a pretty big bubble with quite a lot of vested interested, but meh 🤷

      jpkolsen@social.data.coopJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jpkolsen@social.data.coopJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jpkolsen@social.data.coop
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @benjaoming that and/or charge fees on externalities corresponding to the damage they cause. If the hyperscalers actually paid for the water, the power, the noise, the pollution to environment and climate then their business model would be even more broken. Oh and make them respect licenses and copyright in training

      benjaoming@social.data.coopB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jpkolsen@social.data.coopJ jpkolsen@social.data.coop

        @benjaoming that and/or charge fees on externalities corresponding to the damage they cause. If the hyperscalers actually paid for the water, the power, the noise, the pollution to environment and climate then their business model would be even more broken. Oh and make them respect licenses and copyright in training

        benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
        benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
        benjaoming@social.data.coop
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @jpkolsen You're right 🎯 there are a million other problems, capitalism essentially doesn't work. That's why we're seeing all this nonsense. But to get some sort of start / direction, regulation can simply target an effective stop for new datacenters.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benjaoming@social.data.coopB benjaoming@social.data.coop

          A simple, effective way to regulate AI is to put a cap on how many datacenters that can be built.

          It's easy for lawmakers, and will (if capitalism does its work) shift the limited resources to the most profitable usages of AI.

          Of course, that'd make the bubble burst... which would suck because it's a pretty big bubble with quite a lot of vested interested, but meh 🤷

          gentauro@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gentauro@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gentauro@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @benjaoming can't we just use Novo Nordisk Gefion as an example?

          Nobody knew how to use it. They still do not. And apparently, the devices are already outdated (they can't get spareparts anymore).

          So now they have a HUGE pile of junk, ready to be … what exactly?

          reynir@social.data.coopR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gentauro@mastodon.socialG gentauro@mastodon.social

            @benjaoming can't we just use Novo Nordisk Gefion as an example?

            Nobody knew how to use it. They still do not. And apparently, the devices are already outdated (they can't get spareparts anymore).

            So now they have a HUGE pile of junk, ready to be … what exactly?

            reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
            reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
            reynir@social.data.coop
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @gentauro @benjaoming
            > ready to be … what exactly?

            gReEn DiStRiCt HeAtInG! At least if you are dumb and believe the mayor here.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Svar
            • Svar som emne
            Login for at svare
            • Ældste til nyeste
            • Nyeste til ældste
            • Most Votes


            • Log ind

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            Graciously hosted by data.coop
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Hjem
            • Seneste
            • Etiketter
            • Populære
            • Verden
            • Bruger
            • Grupper