Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
38 Indlæg 29 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • bloognoo@retro.pizzaB bloognoo@retro.pizza

    @davidgerard
    Microsoft don't realise how bad their experience truely is when compared to linux. They need to ship with drivers built in and decent software options from the get go, and they can't and won't.
    I can rebuild my daily runner from bare drives and a usb key in under an hour. Never ever have i been able to do that with Windows.

    darcmoughty@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    darcmoughty@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    darcmoughty@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #25

    @bloognoo @davidgerard In the last few years, they managed to make Calculator, Notepad, and the Taskbar feel unreliable and janky. I don't think they know what 'quality' is, so it's hard to imagine that they can achieve it.

    IMO, Windows is long overdue for a deep refactor. Keep the kernel, but break-up the various runtimes for different eras of the OS into immutable and separated blobs, and then run apps on those. I don't mind waiting a few seconds for legacy apps to fire-up a legacy runtime if it means my system won't consume 11GB RAM just to get to a desktop.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

      @david_chisnall @davidgerard backwards compatibility is very much a sacred cow when it comes to Windows. There are huge customers that can move the revenue needle, who still need OLE32. There are thousands of applications that are still in use that need OLE32.

      And they've always essentially promised that things will always be backwards compatible. If it worked on Windows 3.11, then it will basically keep working, forever. Which is no small feat to begin with.

      dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
      dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
      dukeboitans@mas.to
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #26

      @rootwyrm @david_chisnall @davidgerard Win 3 (16-bit) applications don't work on Win 11 anyway. For all the rest of legacy applications (from Win 2000 to Win 10) they can always ask Copilot to vibe code something like WINE for them, assuming it's not busy converting all C++ code to Rust.

      rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dukeboitans@mas.toD dukeboitans@mas.to

        @rootwyrm @david_chisnall @davidgerard Win 3 (16-bit) applications don't work on Win 11 anyway. For all the rest of legacy applications (from Win 2000 to Win 10) they can always ask Copilot to vibe code something like WINE for them, assuming it's not busy converting all C++ code to Rust.

        rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
        rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
        rootwyrm@weird.autos
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #27

        @dukeboitans @david_chisnall @davidgerard oh, no, that's just flat out wrong. The old 16-bit stuff still works more or less perfectly with the compatibility shims. That's what NTVDM is for. It's why OTVDM is a thing and works even though it's "obsolete" technology.

        It's impressive and terrifying at the same time. Especially when you consider that in theory, you can in-place upgrade from Windows 3.11 all the way to 11.

        dukeboitans@mas.toD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

          it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

          no really, Microsoft is literally using SteamOS as its benchmark and working hard to catch up to it in performance, this is not a drill

          https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/what-is-windows-k2-everything-you-need-to-know-saving-windows-11

          dickon@splodge.fluff.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
          dickon@splodge.fluff.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
          dickon@splodge.fluff.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #28

          @davidgerard It's actually funnier than that: it isn't 'Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance', it's 'Windows might catch up to Linux *running Windows games, pretending to be Windows* in gaming performance'.

          It says a lot when emulating something is quicker than running the thing natively.

          utf_7@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

            @dukeboitans @david_chisnall @davidgerard oh, no, that's just flat out wrong. The old 16-bit stuff still works more or less perfectly with the compatibility shims. That's what NTVDM is for. It's why OTVDM is a thing and works even though it's "obsolete" technology.

            It's impressive and terrifying at the same time. Especially when you consider that in theory, you can in-place upgrade from Windows 3.11 all the way to 11.

            dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
            dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
            dukeboitans@mas.to
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #29

            @rootwyrm @david_chisnall @davidgerard idk, at microsoft they don't seem to know this, you tell them. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/application-management/x64-windows-not-support-16-bit-programs

            rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dukeboitans@mas.toD dukeboitans@mas.to

              @rootwyrm @david_chisnall @davidgerard idk, at microsoft they don't seem to know this, you tell them. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/application-management/x64-windows-not-support-16-bit-programs

              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autos
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #30

              @dukeboitans @david_chisnall @davidgerard that's the official policy; nothing that old is "officially" supported. But like all things with Microsoft, enough money changes it.

              https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/ntvdm-and-16-bit-app-support

              dukeboitans@mas.toD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                @dukeboitans @david_chisnall @davidgerard that's the official policy; nothing that old is "officially" supported. But like all things with Microsoft, enough money changes it.

                https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/ntvdm-and-16-bit-app-support

                dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                dukeboitans@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                dukeboitans@mas.to
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #31

                @rootwyrm @david_chisnall @davidgerard It's right at the start: "for all IA-32 editions of the Windows NT family (not included with 64-bit versions of the OS)." I don't know what sorcery is required to make it run on Win 11, but whatever it is it's not official, I don't think it can be considered as a promise of any kind. I think it's time to drop this mythological backward compatibility.

                david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                  it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

                  no really, Microsoft is literally using SteamOS as its benchmark and working hard to catch up to it in performance, this is not a drill

                  https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/what-is-windows-k2-everything-you-need-to-know-saving-windows-11

                  npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  npars01@mstdn.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #32

                  @davidgerard

                  As long as Microsoft ties itself to fossil fuel funded AI, no thanks.
                  https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-google-hand-dissident-data-to-saudi-arabia-activists-say-2023-7

                  https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2025/07/17/bill-gates-charles-koch-and-three-other-billionaires-are-giving-1-billion-to-enhance-economic-mobility-in-the-us/

                  https://news.microsoft.com/source/emea/2026/02/microsoft-accelerates-ai-skilling-in-saudi-arabia-helping-3-million-people-acquire-ai-skills-by-2030/

                  https://datacentremagazine.com/news/when-will-microsoft-saudi-data-centre-region-go-live

                  Aligning themselves with fascists like Larry Ellison, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel & #PrinceBonesaw

                  Fund a Fascist & Find Out.
                  https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/29/microsoft-market-cap-earnings.html

                  https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html

                  They deserve their consequences, they've earned them.
                  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/technology/amazon-google-persian-gulf-war.html

                  https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/04/23/why-oracle-stock-just-dropped/

                  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm296jzzl9yo

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dukeboitans@mas.toD dukeboitans@mas.to

                    @rootwyrm @david_chisnall @davidgerard It's right at the start: "for all IA-32 editions of the Windows NT family (not included with 64-bit versions of the OS)." I don't know what sorcery is required to make it run on Win 11, but whatever it is it's not official, I don't think it can be considered as a promise of any kind. I think it's time to drop this mythological backward compatibility.

                    david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #33

                    @dukeboitans @rootwyrm @davidgerard

                    There's also the note below:

                    NTVDM is a Feature on Demand and only supported on the x86 version of Windows. It is not supported on x64 and ARM versions of Windows, which do not support 16-bit x86 code of any kind, including DOS programs.

                    Note that the first use of x86 is Windows terminology, meaning x86-32, the second means x86. The middle one where they say x64 means x86-64.

                    As I recall, this was because there's no mechanism to jump to 16-bit mode from long mode on x86. There are some ways of making it work, but they're very clunky. And, given how fast DOSBox is on modern hardware, it's usually simpler to run Win16 in an emulator than try.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                      it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

                      no really, Microsoft is literally using SteamOS as its benchmark and working hard to catch up to it in performance, this is not a drill

                      https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/what-is-windows-k2-everything-you-need-to-know-saving-windows-11

                      froge@social.glitched.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
                      froge@social.glitched.systemsF This user is from outside of this forum
                      froge@social.glitched.systems
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #34

                      @davidgerard@circumstances.run I have been saying for years that a lot (not all, but a lot) of AAA windows games run better on wine/proton, but especially lately I've noticed some things like 1% frame times and graphics stutter being better on linux, which makes the games feel nicer too lol

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

                        no really, Microsoft is literally using SteamOS as its benchmark and working hard to catch up to it in performance, this is not a drill

                        https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/what-is-windows-k2-everything-you-need-to-know-saving-windows-11

                        dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #35

                        @davidgerard LOL, also LMAO

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                          it's possible that one day Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance

                          no really, Microsoft is literally using SteamOS as its benchmark and working hard to catch up to it in performance, this is not a drill

                          https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/what-is-windows-k2-everything-you-need-to-know-saving-windows-11

                          scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          scaletheory@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #36

                          @davidgerard

                          LMAO, 🤣

                          Save microsoft or any other bully corporation who over-thew the Peoples Gov, should never, ever, happen.

                          Eat the bully rich arseholes! Make them pay! on so many levels or scales.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dickon@splodge.fluff.orgD dickon@splodge.fluff.org

                            @davidgerard It's actually funnier than that: it isn't 'Windows might catch up to Linux in gaming performance', it's 'Windows might catch up to Linux *running Windows games, pretending to be Windows* in gaming performance'.

                            It says a lot when emulating something is quicker than running the thing natively.

                            utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                            utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                            utf_7@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #37

                            @dickon @davidgerard how the turntables

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                              @davidgerard
                              Took them long enough to admit that stock Windows 11 is noticeably worse than stock Win10.
                              librarysquirrel@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                              librarysquirrel@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
                              librarysquirrel@sunny.garden
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #38

                              @moses_izumi @davidgerard I was excited when it first came out cos it looked nicer to me visually. Then I saw the new right click menu. It then went downhill from there...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper